NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
ST. Thomas University NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
Various approaches are applied in healthcare research to analyze difficulties and improve patient care. Though each has its own advantages and disadvantages, qualitative and quantitative research designs present distinctive viewpoints. Actual practice in nursing and patient care is enhanced by incorporating these methods, which promote a complete understanding of healthcare phenomena.
One study by Scanzera and colleagues (2023) named “Barriers and facilitators to ophthalmology visit adherence in an urban hospital setting” is a perfect instance of a recent qualitative research design in nursing healthcare. With the objective to understand patients’ opinions on challenges to receiving eye care services, this investigation used semi-structured interviews. The researchers were in a position to examine the experiences and views of patients in great detail because of the qualitative technique. This also revealed subtle variables including financial restraints, lack of knowledge about eye diseases and difficulties with transportation (Scanzera et al., 2023). Through the use of thematic analysis, the academics were able to pinpoint important themes that provided insights into the hurdles to timely eye treatment and helped medical personnel better meet the wants and needs of their patients.
Conversely, a trial by Kolcu & Ergun (2020) named “Effects of a Nurse-Led Health Education Intervention on Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients” illustrates a current quantitative research design in nursing. It evaluated the effects of a nurse-led health education intervention on hypertension patients’ medication adherence and blood pressure control using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) methodology. With a fair technique and electronic monitoring equipment, the scholars were able to reliably monitor blood pressure readings and gather objective data on drug compliance. The study showed, through statistical analysis, that the intervention group topped the control group in terms of medication adherence and blood pressure control (Kolcu & Ergun, 2020). In controlling hypertension and fostering improved health outcomes, this proved the efficiency of nurse-led therapies.
It’s imperative to acknowledge the pros and cons of each of these two research designs when critically appraising them. Broad insights into people’s lived experiences are provided by qualitative research which helps us comprehend complicated phenomena better and inspires patient-centered treatment strategies that are integrative in form. Nevertheless, owing to its subjective nature and small sample figures, it might not be very generalizable (Olaghere et al., 2023). On the other hand, quantitative research gives objective data and makes it possible to determine cause-and-effect connections through statistical analysis which improves the validity and precision of conclusions. However, it could miss contextual elements and not fully convey the variety of patient views. In general, combining these designs in healthcare research can encourage patient care and nursing practice that is grounded in evidence.
References
Kolcu, M. & Ergun, A. (2020). Effect of a nurse-led hypertension management program on quality of life, medication adherence and hypertension management in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 20(12): 1182-1189. Retrieved from: DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14068
Olaghere, A., Wilson, D.B. & Kimbrell, C. (2023). Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis. Research Synthesis Methods, 14(6): 847-852. Retrieved from: DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1659
Scanzera, A.C., Sherrod, R.M., Potharazu, A.V., Nguyen, D., Beversluis, C., Karnik, N.S., Chan, R.V.P., Kim, S.J., Krishnan, J.A. & Musick, H. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to ophthalmology visit adherence in an urban hospital setting. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 12(10): 11. Retrieved from: doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.10.11
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 501 Module 2 Discussion Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design
Research uses qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyze data. Both methods seek to comprehend a phenomenon, but their philosophical foundations, data collection methods, and analytical methods differ.
Qualitative Research Design
Interpretivist qualitative studies dig in the psychological life of people, and try to find out, comprehend and assess their subjective experiences, meanings and viewpoints (‘Creswell & Creswell’, 2018). The third approach is provided when the research problem involves detailed investigation of a complicated situations or fields which cannot be restricted to only numerical data.
Qualitative research can help to collect data that is detailed, layered and thoroughly embedded where needed. Interviews, observations, focus groups, and document review are the methods used in this context to collect data directly from study participants in their environment where they reside or engage in their community activities (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). This brings forward people’s thinking patterns or the way they see things, what they do and what they think of what they experience. Quantitative research proceeds according to numbers and accounts, but qualitative research takes into consideration human complexity in the whole and tries to inspect events in their contexts.
Qualitative research is a ray of strong sunshine that limites their generalizability because of its context and the participants involved. Qualitative research encounters problems of: it is not possible to infer any causality by analyzing only small groups and it is allowed to use purposive sampling that is unreliable in generalization to the larger population (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). Researchers should also practice as reflexive and transparent as they possibly can, in a research activity which is subjective, and can further induce bias in the data collection and analysis process.
Quantitative Research Design
Quantitative research design is based on positivism, which holds that reality is objective and quantifiable (Creswell & Creswell, 2018 This method is useful for hypothesis testing, variable relationships, and sample-to-population generalization.
For quantitative research, surveys, experiments, and systematic observations generate numbers (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). Statistical analysis shows relationships, patterns, and trends. In quantitative research, researchers form hypotheses based on theories or previous research and then test them with data.
Quantitative research is objective, repeatable, and generalizable. Standardised data collection, probability sampling, and statistical analysis improve reliability and validity (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). Quantitative research will give researchers the opportunity to exactly determine the facts by comparing individuals, places, and times and so on.
From time to time this qualitative research receives the same kind of criticism that it does not relaly reflect the true nature of the human beings and their activities. One shortcoming of having a research that is quantitative is that it might overlook contextual details, experience of the subjects, and the individual meaning. This was explained by Creswell & Cornell (2018). The quantitative approach rather than capturing procisions provide facts at specific temporal intervals the dynamic of people behavior may remain unconsidered.
Coincidentally, there is no inherent contradiction between qualitative and quantitative research. Mixed-methods research combines elements of both approaches to better understand the study problem (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). For a more full picture, mixed-methods research blends qualitative and quantitative data’s depth, generalizability, and statistical rigor.
The research topic, phenomena, and purpose determine research design. To test hypotheses, examine correlations between variables, and generalize to broader populations, quantitative research is superior than qualitative research, which explores complicated, context-dependent phenomena and subjective experiences.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.