coursework-banner

NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care

NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care

ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care –Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care     assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care                                                

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care     depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care                                              

The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care     is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care                                              

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care     assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care                                              

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care                                                

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care   assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion Quality of Care 

Healthcare organizations are ethically and professionally mandated to provide and sustain high-quality care. However, many variances occur at different times depending on the workload, organizational resources, and severity of patient issues, among other factors. To address such variances and sustain high performance, the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) should collaborate with other care providers to measure and monitor care quality and the achieved outcomes. Understanding this process, tools, and systems needed is critical to standard care that addresses patient needs comprehensively.

In a typical healthcare organization, APNs and other providers rely on process, outcome, and structural measures to determine whether the delivered care meets the desired standards. According to Jazieh (2020), process measures reflect care providers’ compliance with actions implemented to achieve quality improvement goals. A suitable example is the percentage of people receiving preventive care services. The presence of such interventions demonstrates the providers’ commitment to improve and sustain health. Outcome measures are the indicators used to determine whether healthcare interventions improve patients’ health or other treatment-associated effects (Buck, 2022; Snowdon et al., 2023). For example, the rate of hospital-acquired infections is a highly reliable reflection of the impact of healthcare services for patients at a given time. Since outcomes depend on numerous factors, outcome measures guide care providers in risk adjustment and process standardization to enhance care quality. Structural measures have much to do with an organization’s capacity in terms of systems and processes. For instance, APNs can assess the nurse-to-patient ratio to determine variance in care quality and expected outcomes. A high ratio increases workload and hampers patient outcomes.

Accurate measurement and monitoring of care quality and outcomes is usually data-driven. In this case, healthcare professionals and organizational leaders should have adequate and accurate data to make informed choices. Typically, a comparative analysis of data from clinical records can help APNs determine variances and formulate interventions for higher care quality and outcomes. Data could be sourced from clinical records and is essential for outcome and collective evaluation of the effectiveness of procedures. Care experiences can also guide APNs in determining variances and opportunities for improving quality. Interactions with patients regarding communication, patient-provider interactions, and timeliness of care can help APNs determine gaps between the delivered and expected outcomes. Positive patient care experiences accurately reflect high-quality care (Wong et al., 2020). On the other hand, dissatisfaction denotes gaps that should be addressed to optimize processes and achieve better results.

Care quality measurement and monitoring should be continuous and designed to achieve safe and healthy patient care environments. Based on the gaps that emerge at different times, APNs should collaborate with colleagues and leaders to improve outcomes guided by quality improvement frameworks/models. For instance, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach can be used to implement and evaluate healthcare interventions. Planning involves selecting and defining the components of a measure, while doing involves collecting and monitoring the measured data (Jazieh, 2020). In this study step, care providers analyze the situation and decide about the needed changes. The last step (act) involves implementing the desired changes (Chen et al., 2021). The inference is that care quality measurement is goal-driven and outcome-oriented. Hence, APNs should measure and monitor it purposefully to address performance gaps that hamper care quality.

References

Buck, J. A. (2022). The limits of using outcomes as quality measures. Psychiatric Services73(6), 693-694. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000873

Chen, Y., VanderLaan, P. A., & Heher, Y. K. (2021). Using the model for improvement and plan‐do‐study‐act to effect smart change and advance quality. Cancer Cytopathology129(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22319

Jazieh, A. R. (2020). Quality measures: Types, selection, and application in health care quality improvement projects. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare3(4), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-X6

Snowdon, D. A., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Marsh, L., Parker, E., Naude, K., & Andrew, N. E. (2023). A landscape assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measures in research, quality improvement and clinical care across a healthcare organisation. BMC Health Services Research23(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09050-1

Wong, E., Mavondo, F., & Fisher, J. (2020). Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: a systematic review of the evidence. BMC Health Services Research20, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05383-3