NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment

NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment

Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University  NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment                                   

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University   NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment                                   

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University   NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment                                   

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment                                   

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment                                   

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment

Reduction in the rate of medication administration errors is one of the expected project outcomes. Integrated health information technology is effective in facilitating the reduction of medication errors in nursing practice as seen from Ratwani et al. (2018) and Alotaibi and Federico (2017)’s studies. It is also expected that the costs of care incurred by critically ill patients will reduce due to minimization of medication errors (Bolandianbafghi et al., 2017). Lastly, it is expected that the integrated systems will be used consistently to sustain improvements in medication administration errors in the organization.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment

Data Collection Tool

Questionnaires would be used for collecting data for the project. Questionnaires will facilitate the acquisition of broad data about the project’s effectiveness from the participants. Questionnaires are also highly valid and reliable. The reliability can be seen from their ability to measure similar variables in a consistent manner across the participants of the project. The validity of questionnaires is seen from the fact that they can accurately measure the intended outcomes of the project. They also provide data that reflects the true experiences or perceptions of the participants. The applicability of questionnaires for the project is seen from its use in scientific studies, including nursing (Gray & Grove, 2020).

There are many challenges in improving the health of populations and one of the biggest challenges has to do with the delivery and utilization of the interventions that are being proposed (Dearing, 2018). When it comes to the delivery of the interventions, it incorporates more than one factor. The factors that are considered in the delivery of the interventions include communication, training, leadership, coordination, and management (Dearing, 2018). When it comes to change, organizational readiness needs to be assessed. Two tools that can be used to assess organizational readiness includes the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) tool and the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC). As my organization is a Magnet facility and already supports and implements evidence-based practices, I chose the ORIC tool to discuss. The ORIC tool is the most appropriate for assessing my organizations readiness as this tool focuses on the readiness of the organizational members for implementing change. Being a Magnet facility, my organization has proven that they support nursing excellence and to determine if the team members are ready for change implementation, the ORIC tool would be ideal to evaluate this. When the organization’s readiness is high, the members are more likely to initiate and put forth greater effort for implementing change and on the flip side when the organization’s readiness is low, the team members are more than likely to view change as undesirable and may resist change (Shea et al., 2014). With my proposed evidence-based change, it does involve a fully engaged team which is even more of a reason to use the ORIC tool to help determine the team’s readiness for change and hopefully lead to a successful change implementation.

Statistical Test

T-test will be used in the project. T-test refers to a statistical computation that compares the mean of two samples. T-test will be used since it is expected that the mean and standard deviation of the population data may be unknown. Besides, it is appropriate for the project as it will provide an accurate picture of the effectiveness of the intervention pre and post-interventional phases (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2018). It will also provide a true picture of the effect size of the intervention.

Methods

Data will be checked for completeness and accuracy. The completeness of data is important to facilitate easy analysis. Data extraction, coding, and analysis will also be done to determine the effectiveness of the project. Data interpretation will then be made to develop conclusions on the effectiveness of the intervention.

Strategies if Outcomes do not Provide Positive or Expected Results

The project is implemented with the aim of achieving its outcomes. However, a number of interventions will be adopted should they not provide the expected results or positive outcomes. One of them will be investigating the factors that contributed to the project’s failure. A root cause analysis will be performed to guide the identification of project issues that led to the failure and interventions needed to improve its outcomes. The second strategy would be prolonging the project duration; as new strategies are being implemented. Prolonging the duration will enable the team to implement new strategies, which may transform the outcomes of the project.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue the Proposed Solution

The outcomes of the project will guide the decisions to be made by the team involved in the process. For example, the project will be maintained if the analysis of data shows it to have positive effects on the organizational indicators of safety, quality, and efficiency. It will also be maintained if the analysis shows it to be highly feasible with a positive adoption response from the healthcare providers. The project will be extended if the project outcomes cannot be determined if effective or not. The extension will enable further determination of the effectiveness of the project in achieving its objectives. The project will be revised if found that its strategies do not align with its mission. It will be discontinued if found to increase the rates of medication errors among critically ill patients in the hospital.

Conclusion

Medication errors have adverse effects on the health of the patients. It predisposes them to unintended harm. It also increases the costs incurred by prolonging the hospital stay of patients. It also increases the operational costs in healthcare due to increased resource utilization in caring patients affected by the errors. Integrated electronic health records are effective in reducing and preventing medication administration errors. The reviewed evidence supports the use of the technology in promoting safety of patient care. Therefore, it is anticipated that enhanced care outcomes will be achieved with the use of the proposed intervention.

Assessment Description