NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment
NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment
Evaluation Plan
Expected Outcomes
Reduction in the rate of medication administration errors is one of the expected project outcomes. Integrated health information technology is effective in facilitating the reduction of medication errors in nursing practice as seen from Ratwani et al. (2018) and Alotaibi and Federico (2017)’s studies. It is also expected that the costs of care incurred by critically ill patients will reduce due to minimization of medication errors (Bolandianbafghi et al., 2017). Lastly, it is expected that the integrated systems will be used consistently to sustain improvements in medication administration errors in the organization.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evaluation Plan Assignment
Data Collection Tool
Questionnaires would be used for collecting data for the project. Questionnaires will facilitate the acquisition of broad data about the project’s effectiveness from the participants. Questionnaires are also highly valid and reliable. The reliability can be seen from their ability to measure similar variables in a consistent manner across the participants of the project. The validity of questionnaires is seen from the fact that they can accurately measure the intended outcomes of the project. They also provide data that reflects the true experiences or perceptions of the participants. The applicability of questionnaires for the project is seen from its use in scientific studies, including nursing (Gray & Grove, 2020).
There are many challenges in improving the health of populations and one of the biggest challenges has to do with the delivery and utilization of the interventions that are being proposed (Dearing, 2018). When it comes to the delivery of the interventions, it incorporates more than one factor. The factors that are considered in the delivery of the interventions include communication, training, leadership, coordination, and management (Dearing, 2018). When it comes to change, organizational readiness needs to be assessed. Two tools that can be used to assess organizational readiness includes the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) tool and the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC). As my organization is a Magnet facility and already supports and implements evidence-based practices, I chose the ORIC tool to discuss. The ORIC tool is the most appropriate for assessing my organizations readiness as this tool focuses on the readiness of the organizational members for implementing change. Being a Magnet facility, my organization has proven that they support nursing excellence and to determine if the team members are ready for change implementation, the ORIC tool would be ideal to evaluate this. When the organization’s readiness is high, the members are more likely to initiate and put forth greater effort for implementing change and on the flip side when the organization’s readiness is low, the team members are more than likely to view change as undesirable and may resist change (Shea et al., 2014). With my proposed evidence-based change, it does involve a fully engaged team which is even more of a reason to use the ORIC tool to help determine the team’s readiness for change and hopefully lead to a successful change implementation.
Statistical Test
T-test will be used in the project. T-test refers to a statistical computation that compares the mean of two samples. T-test will be used since it is expected that the mean and standard deviation of the population data may be unknown. Besides, it is appropriate for the project as it will provide an accurate picture of the effectiveness of the intervention pre and post-interventional phases (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2018). It will also provide a true picture of the effect size of the intervention.
Methods
Data will be checked for completeness and accuracy. The completeness of data is important to facilitate easy analysis. Data extraction, coding, and analysis will also be done to determine the effectiveness of the project. Data interpretation will then be made to develop conclusions on the effectiveness of the intervention.
Strategies if Outcomes do not Provide Positive or Expected Results
The project is implemented with the aim of achieving its outcomes. However, a number of interventions will be adopted should they not provide the expected results or positive outcomes. One of them will be investigating the factors that contributed to the project’s failure. A root cause analysis will be performed to guide the identification of project issues that led to the failure and interventions needed to improve its outcomes. The second strategy would be prolonging the project duration; as new strategies are being implemented. Prolonging the duration will enable the team to implement new strategies, which may transform the outcomes of the project.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue the Proposed Solution
The outcomes of the project will guide the decisions to be made by the team involved in the process. For example, the project will be maintained if the analysis of data shows it to have positive effects on the organizational indicators of safety, quality, and efficiency. It will also be maintained if the analysis shows it to be highly feasible with a positive adoption response from the healthcare providers. The project will be extended if the project outcomes cannot be determined if effective or not. The extension will enable further determination of the effectiveness of the project in achieving its objectives. The project will be revised if found that its strategies do not align with its mission. It will be discontinued if found to increase the rates of medication errors among critically ill patients in the hospital.
Conclusion
Medication errors have adverse effects on the health of the patients. It predisposes them to unintended harm. It also increases the costs incurred by prolonging the hospital stay of patients. It also increases the operational costs in healthcare due to increased resource utilization in caring patients affected by the errors. Integrated electronic health records are effective in reducing and preventing medication administration errors. The reviewed evidence supports the use of the technology in promoting safety of patient care. Therefore, it is anticipated that enhanced care outcomes will be achieved with the use of the proposed intervention.
Assessment Description
For this assignment, you will synthesize the independent evidence-based practice project proposal assignments from NUR-550 and NUR-590 into a 4,500-5,000-word professional paper.
Final Paper
The final paper should:
- Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructors.
- Synthesize the different elements of the overall project into one paper. The synthesis should reflect the main concepts for each section, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and be rewritten to include the critical aspects (do not copy and paste the assignments).
- Contain supporting research for the evidence-based practice project proposal.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Main Body of the Paper
The main body of your paper should include the following sections:
- Problem Statement
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
Appendices
The appendices at the end of your paper should include the following:
- All final changes or revisions for the drafts that will be included in the appendices of your paper.
- Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper. In each preceding course you have been directed to the Student Success Center for assistance with APA style, and have submitted the APA Writing Checklist to help illustrate your adherence to APA style. This final paper should demonstrate a clear ability to communicate your project in a professional and accurately formatted paper using APA style. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
General Requirements
You are required to cite 10-12 peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing
1.1: Translate research and knowledge gained from practice, while adhering to ethical research standards, to improve patient outcomes and clinical practice.
5.1: Design ethically sound, evidence-based solutions to complex health care issues related to individuals, populations, and systems of care.
The evaluation of evidence-based practice (EBP) project proposal is essential to ascertain the effectiveness of the suggested intervention. The evaluation must define the expected outcomes, and identify data collection tools to determine their effectiveness, validity, reliability and application to the project (Melnyk et al., 2019). Additionally, statistical tests for the proposed intervention should be selected and be appropriate or align with the data collection tools. The purpose of this paper to describe the evaluation plan for the proposed EBP project of implementing Fall TIPS to reduce falls among adult patients in medical-surgical unit.
Expected Outcomes
The EBP process implores one to identify the expected outcomes of the proposed project. Most EBP projects focus on improving quality of patient care through leveraging research evidence and optimization of clinical skills and knowledge. Imperatively, the main expected outcome for this EBP project proposal is to reduce the occurrence of patient falls in the medical-surgical unit by 30% within six months of the implementation (Rebekah et al., 2018). The expectation is that implementing Fall TIPS will allow nurses and other providers to tailor fall prevention interventions based on a patient’s condition and not a one-fits-all approach.
Data Collection Tool: Validity, Reliability & Applicability
While there are different data collection tools for EBP project proposal. In this case, the project will use qualitative design meaning that it will apply questionnaires and focus groups as well as observation to collect data on the efficacy of the proposed intervention. These data collection tools are valid and applicable as well as reliable since they gather data from patients on firsthand experience. These tools will be effective because they will integrate diverse aspects of the project and what it means for patients in the setting (Grove et al., 2019). The semi-structured questions and observations will complement each other and increase the overall validity and reliability.
Statistical Test
Researchers use appropriate statistical test tools based on the type of data collection deployed. Researchers use statistical test to organize data into evaluable results to determine the effectiveness of an EBP project proposal. Because of the various sets of subjects and data collection tools, the most appropriate statistical test will be the t-test. The independent t-test has data from different subjects so difference in measurements among the individuals can be determined (Rebekah et al., 2018). This test is best-suited to the project due to the data collection tools selected to gather information from patients on Fall TIPS model.
Methods Applied to the Data Collection Tool
As part of the evaluation plan, methods must be uses to the data collection tool and consideration should be made on outcome measures. Method analysis and presentation influences the evaluation of study claims, promotes more rigor on access to data and encouraged increased transparency and honesty in research. Using data collected through semi-structured questionnaires, the researchers will measure patient outcomes and experiences (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2020). They will then tabulate the data to determine if there are changes after the implementation of the Fall TIPS. The research will the deploy computation tools to determine rates of improvement based on the reduction of falls within the unit.
Alternative Strategies
An effective evaluation plan must develop alternative strategies that can be used if outcomes are not positive or fail to deliver expected results. Improving care quality through reduced prevalence of falls is an iterative process meaning that it is not immune to corrections and refining as providers learn from experience to improve outcomes. The implication is that the project will integrate effective approaches that include better communication and collaboration, use of inter-professional interventions based on better communication approaches.
Strategies to Address Unexpected or Negative Outcomes
It is anticipated that the proposed intervention will result in positive outcomes as indicated above. However, in the event that the outcomes are negative, the researchers will deploy various strategies to correct the issue. The first strategy will be to re-examine the implemented intervention by analyzing the process and all components associated with ach stage. Such an approach may reveal weak areas of the project that requires improvement for the intervention to offer better outcomes. The next strategy is formulation of new timelines, especially extending the project schedule and time. This will allow the stakeholders to explore corrective measures and possibly have better outcomes. The other aspect would be to change the implementation model or conceptual framework, if possible, and where it does not offer better interpretation of the expected outcomes.
Plan to Maintain, Extend, Revise, & Discontinue the EBP Project
The maintenance, extension, revision and discontinuation of the EBP project will require developing an appropriate plan. In this case, sustenance of the EBP implementation will require training, continual quality monitoring, and developing teams that will review areas of concern and ensure that the Fall TIPS focus on patient needs and concerns. Review of objectives and goals will also be important as it identify areas that may be discontinued because of their inappropriateness to the project Revision will be based on the project’s inability to meet expected outcomes. The review process will trigger change aimed at providing better approaches to avoid similar mistakes in the future.
Conclusion
Evaluation is a critical phase of the EBP process and project implementation. Developing an evaluation plan allows stakeholders and project team to understand different aspects of the implementation and the expected outcomes. The evaluation plan identifies weak areas and what the implementers can integrate to attain expected outcomes.
References
Grove, S. K., & Cipher, D. J. (2019). Statistics for Nursing Research-e-book: A
workbook for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Lengnick-Hall, R., Willging, C. E., Hurlburt, M. S., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). Incorporators, early
investors, and learners: A longitudinal study of organizational adaptation during EBP implementation and sustainment. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01031-w
Koota, E., Kääriäinen, M., Kyngäs, H., Lääperi, M., & Melender, H. (2021). Effectiveness of
evidence‐based practice (EBP) education on emergency nurses’ EBP attitudes, knowledge, self‐efficacy, skills, and behavior: A randomized controlled trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12485
Melnyk, B. M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing &
Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
Rebekah, G., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Statistical analysis in nursing research. Indian Journal of
Continuing Nursing Education,19(1), 62-70. https://www.ijcne.org/text.asp?
2018/19/1/62/28649
Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper – Rubric
Synthesis
Criteria Description
Synthesis Paragraphs are logically sequenced, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and are rewritten to present a fluid and cohesive paper. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
Synthesis is excellent. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. The paper is well-developed, fluid, and cohesive.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
Synthesis is evident. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Overall, the paper applies transitions and the paper is fluid and cohesive.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
Synthesis is generally evident. The paper organizes most paragraphs in a logical sequence and generally connects ideas or overreaching concepts. Some paragraphs require better transitions to create a fluid and cohesive paper. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
Synthesis is sporadic. Overall, the paper fails to organize paragraphs in a logical sequence and connect ideas or overreaching concepts in a fluid and cohesive paper.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Synthesis is not evident. The paper consists of a cut-and-paste of the previous assignments. Revision based on instructor feedback is not included.
Organizational Culture and Readiness
Criteria Description
Organizational Culture and Readiness Culture, degree of readiness, challenges to implementation, strategies for implementation, stakeholder involvement, communication strategies. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and insight into the organization challenges is presented. Clear strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The organizational culture and readiness are discussed and information on the organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
An incomplete description of the organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges is presented. Strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are incomplete.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The organizational culture, readiness, and some organizational challenges, are summarized. General strategies for the overall implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
Problem Statement (B)
Criteria Description
Problem Statement (C5.1a)
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and describes the issue using evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The problem statement is mostly consistent throughout the paper and, in most instances, uses evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The problem statement is inconsistently presented throughout the paper. Evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is missing in many aspects.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not used throughout the paper. In general, evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem is not provided.
Literature Review
Criteria Description
Literature Review
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is organized and synthesized strategically throughout the paper to provide convincing evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide substantial rationale for how the research supports the PICOT. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is used throughout most of the paper to provide evidence. The articles are used to provide general rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is synthesized and used throughout the paper to provide evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The supporting literature from the literature review is inconsistently used in the paper to provide evidence. The articles do not provide clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Supporting literature from the literature review is not evident. Clear rationale for how the research supports the PICOT is not presented.
Change Model or Framework
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The selected model or framework and its application for the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The selected model or framework and its application for the key aspects of the proposed implementation are described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The selected model or framework and its general application for implementation are outlined.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application for implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan (B)
Criteria Description
Plan includes setting/access to subjects; timeline; budget and resources; research design; methods instruments; process for delivering intervention; stakeholders; barriers and challenges. (C5.1b)
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The implementation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The implementation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The implementation plan is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is not described.
Evaluation Plan
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan Plan includes expected outcomes, data collection tools, statistical test, methods applied to data collection tool, strategies for nonpositive outcomes, plans for maintaining, extending, revising and discontinuing proposed solution.
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
The evaluation plan is described and provides key information for the various aspects. Adequate explanations and supporting evidence are provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
The evaluation plan is generally described. Information for some key aspects is presented, but there are inaccuracies. Some additional information is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
The evaluation plan is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Associated Documents and Appendix
Criteria Description
Associated Documents and Appendix Appendix includes consent or approval form; timeline; budget and resource list; method or instrument; APA Writing Checklist.
5. 5: Excellent
9 points
The resources are accurate and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was effectively used in development of the paper.
4. 4: Good
8.28 points
The resources are revised accordingly and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
The resources have been revised, but there are one or two minor errors. The resources are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
The required resources are attached, but an appendix has not been created. Some resources contain errors and have not been revised. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The appendix and required resources are omitted.
Ability to Translate Research and Knowledge to Improve Patient Outcomes and Practice (B)
Criteria Description
Ability to translate research and knowledge to improve patient outcomes and practice (C1.1)
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The final paper clearly adheres to ethical research standards and demonstrates a strong ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The final paper observes ethical research standards and demonstrates an ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The final paper observes ethical research standards, but there are some aspects of the paper that need more detail or information. A general ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is demonstrated.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The final paper is inconsistent in its adherence to ethical research standards. The ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is not consistently demonstrated.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The final paper does not adhere to ethical research standards. The ability to translate research and knowledge gained from practice to the improvement of patient outcomes and clinical practice is not demonstrated.
Required Sources
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
4. 4: Good
6.9 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory
6.6 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
9.66 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
6.9 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
6.6 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Paper Format
Criteria Description
Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
4. 4: Good
6.9 points
All format elements are correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
6.6 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change is thoroughly discussed. The various aspects of the culture are included. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
6.9 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
6.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.