NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Description of the Rationale for the Methods used in Collecting the Outcome Data
The use of different methods for outcome data collection was informed by distinct reasons. For instance, the questionnaires consist of numerous vital components that were used to gauge the satisfaction rate of the entire process. The other methods such as clinical interviews, follow-ups interviews, and chart audits were used to support the patients and to identify areas for improvement. Besides, test monitoring was used to help in tracking the project development, determine the appropriateness of implementation process, and to collect data to help in future implementation endeavors.
How Outcome Measures Evaluate the Extent to which the Project Objectives Are Achieved
Outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved by monitoring the level in which project implementation has influenced the health outcomes of the population in focus (Gibbons, Black, Fallowfield, Newhouse & Fitzpatrick, 2016). Through the outcome measures, it is possible to determine whether or not the project has realized its goals. Where the objectives are not realized, the measures can help in making adjustments.
How the Outcomes will be Measured and Evaluated Based on the Evidence
The outcomes will be measured and evaluated through standard data collection tools whose effectiveness has been established. However, where the tool need to be developed or realigned to the local needs of the target population, it is imperative to conduct a preliminary test before rolling it out the target population. Consequently, according to Bühn et al., (2017), the validity will be established when the data precisely measure what they are intended to measure. Consequently, the reliability will be established if the outcomes measures align with standard methods and definitions. On its side, the applicability will be established when the outcomes address the issue of heart failure among African American males.
Description of the Strategies to take if Outcomes do not Provide Positive Results
The best strategy implementation team can take when the outcomes provide negative results are to take charge, focus, and establish a centralized communication to manage the project and steer it back to the track. The project should be designed in a flexible manner that can be easily adjusted when the outcomes fail to provide positive results. Besides, there should be contingency measures in place to act as a fall back plan to the project. Besides, the implementation team should be able to identify the origin of the problem, understand the problem areas, and take measures to address the issue and strive to find ways to the right implementation path.
Description of the Implications for Practice and Future Research
The aim of this project was to determine the effectiveness of the use of community health workers to improve the control and management of heart failure among African American males. Although community health workers are important for success of this project, the cultural barriers may prove a challenge to their success. Lack of knowledge in cultural practices by the community health workers, especially who are non-Africans, can potentially impact the project adversely (Clifford, McCalman, Bainbridge & Tsey, 2015). As such, the future studies should focus on adapting materials such as sources of information to ensure that all materials used in the program are culturally responsive to the target population.
References
Bühn, S., Mathes, T., Prengel, P., Wegewitz, U., Ostermann, T., Robens, S., & Pieper, D. (2017). The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 91, 121-128.
Clifford, A., McCalman, J., Bainbridge, R., & Tsey, K. (2015). Interventions to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 27(2), 89-98.
Gibbons, E., Black, N., Fallowfield, L., Newhouse, R., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures and the evaluation of services. In Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. NIHR Journals Library.
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Evidence-based practice (EBP) significantly improves patient outcomes and processes while reducing costs. Its potential to address healthcare quality and safety issues underscores its value and why nursing professionals should continually embrace practice change. Generally, EBP and quality improvement evaluation is a judicious exercise of determining whether projects and programs achieved the desired change (Schuler et al., 2021). Within nursing, the main focus areas are care quality, safety, and costs. Quantitative and qualitative data help nurses evaluate projects and determine their effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to describe the evaluation plan of the project recommending a two-weekly physical exercise program to improve functional performance and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
EBP projects are outcome-driven initiatives for improving patient care. Old age is associated with a gradual decline in physical strength and corresponding loss of functional capacity. Accordingly, the project seeks to enhance functional performance/fitness and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes. In support of such a program, Wickramarachchi et al. (2023) underlined the significance of physical activity in preventing the loss (10%-40%) of muscle mass and joint motion among older adults. The proposed project seeks to help participants improve flexibility, muscle strength, balance, and body movement. Wickramarachchi et al. (2023) further mentioned that increasing muscular strength through physical activity helps to prevent balance disorders associated with aging and the ensuing accidental falls. Therefore, the project is critical to enhancing functional performance, independent living, and the overall quality of life in the target population.
Data Collection Tools
The nature of the proposed project necessitates a quantitative design. Bazen et al. (2021) described quantitative data as numerical, allowing researchers and evidence-based proponents to test hypotheses deductively. The most effective data collection tool for this approach is questionnaires. They will help to collect numerical data and quantify outcomes. According to O’Connor et al. (2022), questionnaires’ validity and reliability are achieved by their clear and consistent wording and enabling researchers to collect rich and large amounts of primary data from participants. Questionnaires are appropriate for the project since outcomes will be compared to baseline to determine its success.
Statistical Test for the Project
The impact of an intervention should be adequately measured to justify the resources and time used in its implementation. Among many statistical tests appropriate for the project, inferential statistics is the most suitable to enable the project leader to make valid conclusions about the project’s effectiveness in addressing the clinical issue. In particular, the range (percentage differences in health changes and experiences) before and after the project will be a reliable reference. According to Sharma (2022), inferential statistics helps researchers to test hypotheses and make judicious generalizations about the survey data. A similar approach will provide accurate and quality data to deduce whether the project is clinically significant.
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
Using the questionnaires, participants will answer specific questions about how physical exercises improved key aspects of functional performance and independence. For an effective program, these aspects are flexibility, muscle strength, balance, and body movement (Lii et al., 2023). To calculate the range, the health statuses (greatly improved, improving, struggling, and no change) will be compared before the intervention (baseline), at four weeks, and after the intervention (eight weeks). Each health status will be rated using a Likert Scale of 1-4, and the total under each column will be converted into a percentage. A range of over 50% will indicate a successful project that should be maintained to sustain outcomes.
Strategies for Outcomes that are Nonpositive
Although EBP project leaders look forward to positive results, it is possible that the implemented change will not meet the desired outcomes. According to Lengnick-Hall et al. (2022), performance gaps may indicate poor implementation, hence the need for a comprehensive outcome evaluation. Here, questions will be asked concerning how, when, and where the recommended activities occurred. The other question area is barriers and facilitators that influenced results. For instance, some participants may be unable to cope with the intensity of the exercise program due to their health state, motivation, and lack of support. This analysis will be the basis for understanding whether the project will be redone or better outcomes can be achieved by executing some modifications. A potential modification is increasing the length of the project or the frequency of the weekly exercises (from 2 to 3 times).
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
The project should be maintained if it achieves the desired results. In this case, it should be continued if it improves the participants’ functional performance and independence (clinically significant results). Continuous monitoring, support, and guidance are necessary to sustain positive outcomes. It can be extended in case of positive results, but improvements in some areas could maximize outcomes. A revision is needed when outcome evaluation demonstrates issues regarding how, where, and when the project was implemented. Such a revision includes adding another physical exercise component, such as endurance training, which improves muscle strength (Markov et al., 2023). The project should be discontinued if the participants are no longer interested or have no resources to sustain it. Such an exercise can also be discontinued when the participants can do everything independently, including data collection, analysis, and decision-making.
Conclusion
EBP is crucial to improving patient outcomes. Within nursing, change leaders determine the success of EBP projects through quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods evaluation. A quantitative approach through questionnaires is the most appropriate evaluation approach for the proposed project. Positive results are expected after the eighth week. To accomplish this, participants are supposed to exercise consistently, collaborate with the project leader, and seek support as situations necessitate.
References
Bazen, A., Barg, F. K., & Takeshita, J. (2021). Research techniques made simple: an introduction to qualitative research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029
O’Connor, S. (2022). Designing and using surveys in nursing research: a contemporary discussion. Clinical nursing research, 31(4), 567-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211064739
Lengnick-Hall, R., Gerke, D. R., Proctor, E. K., Bunger, A. C., Phillips, R. J., Martin, J. K., & Swanson, J. C. (2022). Six practical recommendations for improved implementation outcomes reporting. Implementation Science, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01183-3
Markov, A., Hauser, L., & Chaabene, H. (2023). Effects of concurrent strength and endurance training on measures of physical fitness in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(2), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01764-2
Lii, Y. Y., Tai, Y. C., Wang, H. Y., Yeh, I. C., Chiu, Y. C., Hou, C. Y., & Tsai, F. H. (2023). The impact of exercise training on physical activity among elderly women in the community: a pilot study. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 11(18), 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182601
Schuler, E., Mott, S., Forbes, P. W., Schmid, A., Atkinson, C., & DeGrazia, M. (2021). Evaluation of an evidence-based practice mentorship programme in a paediatric quaternary care setting. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(1-2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987121991417
Sharma, S. (2022). Nursing research and statistics – e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Wickramarachchi, B., Torabi, M. R., & Perera, B. (2023). Effects of physical activity on physical fitness and functional ability in older adults. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 9, 23337214231158476. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231158476