NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Assignment Develop An Evaluation Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Evaluation Plan
Description of the Rationale for the Methods used in Collecting the Outcome Data
The use of different methods for outcome data collection was informed by distinct reasons. For instance, the questionnaires consist of numerous vital components that were used to gauge the satisfaction rate of the entire process. The other methods such as clinical interviews, follow-ups interviews, and chart audits were used to support the patients and to identify areas for improvement. Besides, test monitoring was used to help in tracking the project development, determine the appropriateness of implementation process, and to collect data to help in future implementation endeavors.
How Outcome Measures Evaluate the Extent to which the Project Objectives Are Achieved
Outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved by monitoring the level in which project implementation has influenced the health outcomes of the population in focus (Gibbons, Black, Fallowfield, Newhouse & Fitzpatrick, 2016). Through the outcome measures, it is possible to determine whether or not the project has realized its goals. Where the objectives are not realized, the measures can help in making adjustments.
How the Outcomes will be Measured and Evaluated Based on the Evidence
The outcomes will be measured and evaluated through standard data collection tools whose effectiveness has been established. However, where the tool need to be developed or realigned to the local needs of the target population, it is imperative to conduct a preliminary test before rolling it out the target population. Consequently, according to Bühn et al., (2017), the validity will be established when the data precisely measure what they are intended to measure. Consequently, the reliability will be established if the outcomes measures align with standard methods and definitions. On its side, the applicability will be established when the outcomes address the issue of heart failure among African American males.
Description of the Strategies to take if Outcomes do not Provide Positive Results
The best strategy implementation team can take when the outcomes provide negative results are to take charge, focus, and establish a centralized communication to manage the project and steer it back to the track. The project should be designed in a flexible manner that can be easily adjusted when the outcomes fail to provide positive results. Besides, there should be contingency measures in place to act as a fall back plan to the project. Besides, the implementation team should be able to identify the origin of the problem, understand the problem areas, and take measures to address the issue and strive to find ways to the right implementation path.
Description of the Implications for Practice and Future Research
The aim of this project was to determine the effectiveness of the use of community health workers to improve the control and management of heart failure among African American males. Although community health workers are important for success of this project, the cultural barriers may prove a challenge to their success. Lack of knowledge in cultural practices by the community health workers, especially who are non-Africans, can potentially impact the project adversely (Clifford, McCalman, Bainbridge & Tsey, 2015). As such, the future studies should focus on adapting materials such as sources of information to ensure that all materials used in the program are culturally responsive to the target population.
References
Bühn, S., Mathes, T., Prengel, P., Wegewitz, U., Ostermann, T., Robens, S., & Pieper, D. (2017). The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 91, 121-128.
Clifford, A., McCalman, J., Bainbridge, R., & Tsey, K. (2015). Interventions to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 27(2), 89-98.
Gibbons, E., Black, N., Fallowfield, L., Newhouse, R., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures and the evaluation of services. In Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. NIHR Journals Library.