NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Identify two stakeholder barriers you might experience during the implementation phase of your evidence-based practice project. What strategies can you implement to gain stakeholder support for the project implementation. Provide a suggestion you would give to a colleague who is struggling with obtaining stakeholder support.
Cohesive Collaboration is important to the survival of and success of an organization. Implementation plans can face numerous challenges as a result of lack of knowledge of the problems hurting an organization. This lack of knowledge is common in many organizations were leaders and management are disconnected from day to day operations that help to run the organization. When a person rises through the ranks of the organization into a leadership role they have knowledge of and experience that other managers lack if they hired from the outside. The person who rises through the ranks has more understanding of the how the organization works, the weakness that exist, the organizations strength and how the organization needs to function in order to survive. Where there is s disconnect between stakeholders in higher positions and those working the day to day operations, noting will get done.
There are so many sources that entail the life of Florence Nightingale. This version makes me envision Florence as a very inspiring accolade. Florence Nightingale refused to be married when she was 17 years old as she chose to answer her calling despite her parents being against enrolling as a nursing student at the Lutheran Hospital in Germany. Nightingale faced a cholera outbreak in an unsanitary environment when she returned from school to London and worked at Middlesex hospital. She worked hard to improve the environment’s sanitation, significantly decreasing the number of deaths. All the hard work eventually affected Nightingale’s health. The Crimean War happened between the British and Russian Empires, and many soldiers were admitted into military hospitals. There were not enough female nurses stationed at Crimea hospitals. England then was angry due to the neglect of the soldiers who had fallen ill and injured and lacked medical care due to insufficient caregivers leading to dreadful unsanitary, and inhumane conditions. Nightingale then was called to her calling despite barely recovering from her illness. She assembled a team of nurses and sailed them to Crimea. Nightingale and her nurses warned of the conditions they were about to face but were still unprepared for what they witnessed upon their arrival.
Some of the things that one might experience during the implementation phase are resistance and timing. “Lack of time is often cited as a barrier to implementing EBP. In addition, uncertainty or lack of knowledge about the EBP process is also a barrier, which includes critiquing and appraising the literature related to the clinical problem being addressed” (Ginex, 2018). In busy hospitals lack of time to study and understand new changes and policies can be a barrier. On time of this, resistance to change can also be a barrier. In there is already a flow that nurses are accustomed to even if it is chaotic, having to change that flow requires learning something new or changing ones workflow habits and that can cause resistance to change.
The one suggestion I would give to a fellow colleague would be for them to ask questions, slow down the pace in order for them to understand the new policy and give themselves time to become accustom to it and to always remember that it will take them time to learn something new before they can master it.
Reference:
Ginex, P. (2018). Overcome Barriers to Applying an Evidence-Based Process for Practice Change. Retrieved from https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/overcome-barriers-to-applying-an-evidence-based-process-for-practice-chang
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Stakeholders are the people involved in carrying out the process under review or individuals who become affected with the change in practice (“John Hopkins Nursing”, 2021). It is important to determine the potential stakeholder barriers that will be encountered in order to address them accordingly. The two stakeholder barriers that can be experienced are resistance to change and lack of authority. Physicians, who are one of the main stakeholders, are perceived to be the least supportive in EBP implementation (Jordan et al., 2021). Without their support, it can make the implementation process difficult. Resistance of practitioners to change from traditional practices to newer concepts introduced in EBP can be a barrier to the implementation process (Jordan et al., 2021). Moreover, some staff nurses feel that they lack authority to make changes in their unit or they do not have the “power” to implement the EBP project. One study suggested that majority of the nurses in a private ICU reported that they lacked the authority to change practice in order to facilitate the implementation of EBP (Jordan et al., 2021).
There are several strategies to gain stakeholder support. First, the support of physicians for the implementation of EBP should be encouraged (Jordan et al., 2021). It is important to keep an open communication between the researcher and physicians. Explaining the goals and benefits of the EBP project in improving patient care can help gain their support. Second, it is recommended to carefully identify individual barriers versus organizational barriers at an early stage (Jordan et al., 2021). Lastly, identifying your stakeholders as well as engaging them early in the EBP process is important because stakeholder buy-in is important for its successful implementation (“John Hopkins Nursing”, 2021). The goal is to gain their trust and confidence and gain as much support as possible for the successful project implementation.
References
Jordan, P., Bowers, C., Cur, M. & Morton, D. (2016). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in a
private intensive care unit in the eastern cape. SAJCC, 32(2). DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.253
“John Hopkins Nursing”. (2021). Upstate Medical University. https://guides.upstate.edu/c.php?g=1023176&p=7411256
Sample Answer 3 for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Stakeholders are vital to the implementation process as support supplied can hinder the potential outcomes and results of the research or interventions. Two stakeholder barriers I believe I would encounter during the implementation process for my project would be staff engagement and organizational allowance for collaboration.
Staff engagement from a nursing perspective can be difficult as education about nutrition (specifically types of diets) may be unfamiliar and uncomfortable. Although nutrition within an acute setting from a nursing perspective can be seen from meals and nutrition deficits. Expecting nursing to utilize nutrition education within an acute setting may be inappropriate as the focus of patient care and safety would be the priority, engaging them on nutrition education would demand them to switch their focus and may decrease patient outcomes. Nurses may not be motivated to participate in interventions if it does not directly affect acute care outcomes within this setting. This is why education may be promoted as a nursing education intervention as a preparation for post-acute health and wellness and the intervention should be made to address nursing at a community health or public health perspective (Leung, Trevena, & Waters, 2016).
Organizational tolerance of implementing research internally can be difficult as well because most organizations would not want to provide resources to interventions that would not benefit both the patient and organization. This would mean that there is less likeliness to provide resources within the organization and the researcher must acquire and obtain information and deploy internal interventions on their own accord. There is also the chance of declination of approval to implement interventions because the organization may not want to sacrifice work time of the education or nutrition staff on an intervention that may not have significant outcomes to care in the long term (Williams. Candon, Stewart, Byeon, Bewtra, Buttenheim, Zentgraf, Comeau, Shoyinka & Beidas, 2021).
A decent suggestion to a colleague who is struggling with stakeholders would be to understand and present what may become of the outcomes and provide enough evidence that says that supporting the intervention can be part of a greater investment to the care provided. This may help increase stakeholder’s confidence in supporting an intervention.
References:
Williams. N, Candon, M., Stewart, R., Byeon, V., Bewtra, M., Buttenheim, A., Zentgraf, K., Comeau, C., Shoyinka, S., & Beidas, R. (2021). Community stakeholder preferences for evidence-based practice implementation strategies in behavioral health: a best-worst scaling choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03072-x
Leung, K., Trevena, L., & Waters, D. (2016). Development of a competency framework for evidence-based practice in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 39, 189–196. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.026
Sample Answer 4 for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
When in a leadership role, leaders need to develop relationships with stakeholders. Engaging with stakeholders will build trust and develop learning systems for evidence-based projects. Stakeholders can also help define outcome metrics. Having buy-in from the beginning will aid in the planning of a more substantial project and execution approach. The two stakeholder barriers that one may experience during the implementation phase of the evidence paste project are resources and participation. Limited financial and personnel resources and competing goals might provide significant difficulties (Murphy et al., 2021).
Financial assistance, space, and training were all limited, as was access to mental health treatment. Investing in and exploiting established local experience and capabilities can assist in resolving. The difficulty in obtaining active involvement from stakeholders and differing expectations about the nature of participation was recognized as obstacles, whereas possibilities for meaningful participation and empowerment were identified as drives (Ginex, 2019). Participants address the implications of working with and educating providers in the context of failing healthcare delivery systems, complicated socioeconomic settings, and management and organizational hurdles in the medical sector.
Ginex, P. (2019). Overcome Barriers to Applying an Evidence-Based Process for Practice Change. ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/overcome-barriers-to-applying-an-evidence-based-process-for-practice-change
Murphy, J., Qureshi, O., Endale, T., Esponda, G. M., Pathare, S., Eaton, J., De Silva, M., & Ryan, G. (2021). Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement in global mental health projects. International Journal of
Mental Health Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00458-y
Sample Answer 5 for NUR 590 Stakeholder Barriers during Implementation
Two stakeholder barriers that I think I will encounter are staff engagement with the project and lack of staff time. For the staff engagement barrier, I would first need to start by making sure the staff understood the reason behind the project. I would need to create a vision and understanding of how the project can improve patient outcomes by using examples of real clinical scenarios (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).I would utilize the unit-based nursing council to help with the education of colleagues and identification of project champions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). This is important because a top-down approach is not successful because it leads to a lack of ownership from front line staff (Mathieson et al., 2019). The project champions would also be utilized to conduct audits and provide feedback.
For the lack of time barrier, it is important to start with organizational support of the project (DeNisco, 2021). Being a Magnet organization and an HRO there is always support over EBP (Evidence Based Practice) projects and quality improvement projects. I would need to set aside uninterrupted time for the unit-based council/champions to learn about the project and educate colleagues. The education would be done during change of shift nursing huddles to save time verses doing it during the work shift. As a NM I may need to wait to implement the project when the unit is better staffed. I am actively hiring and training new nurses in the unit. Once the nurses are trained and on their own this will allow for sufficient staff to implement the project. The project involves patient and family engagement, and the RN (Registered Nurse) needs to be able to educate the importance of CAUTI (Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection) prevention. This is not something that should be rushed.
DeNisco, S.M. (Ed.). (2021). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Matheson, A., Grande, G., & Luker, K. (2019). Strategies, facilitators, and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: A systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 20 doi:10.1017/S1463423618000488
Melnyk, B.M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-Based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer, Inc