NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

Assignment Guidelines

Identify a concept (usually one or two words) you are interested in. Ideally, this concept will be the focus of your DNP Project. Utilize specific scholarly sources, including books or peer-reviewed articles from scholarly journals. You can use a reference book such as an encyclopedia, thesaurus, or dictionary, but limit yourself to only one of each.

Write a brief paper (three to four pages) in APA (7th edition) format addressing the following items:

  • Alternative definitions—these must be referenced
  • Defining attributes
  • Antecedents
  • Consequences
  • Model, borderline, and contrary cases
  • Empirical referents

These items should be the headings for your paper but should be no more than a paragraph or two each. The paper should include a title page and reference page (not included in total paper length) and use of appropriate scholarly sources cited throughout.

You will submit the assignment via Turnitin; a Turnitin score less than 20% is expected. Turnitin is an online service that highlights matching text in written work. It indexes Internet sources, databases of subscription services, and written work submitted through its website. Assignments sent through Turnitin are scanned against all of its sources, and a report is generated that summarizes and highlights matching text and where it was found. It is up to instructors and students to interpret the report to determine if plagiarism occurred.

You may submit your assignment to Turnitin prior to its due date once to assess your work against Turnitin’s database. You may use the Originality Report’s results to address any originality concerns in your work, and then resubmit your assignment for grading. You may only resubmit once until the assignment’s due date. Any work that has been submitted at the time the assignment is due will be considered your final submission, and this will be the submission used for grading.

For additional information, visit Plagiarism Detection: Students.Links to an external site.

The assignment will be evaluated using the Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper Rubric found in your syllabus.

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper page.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper

This week you will identify a potential phenomenon of interest for your DNP Project. To help define the phenomenon of interest and

distinguish between similar concepts, you will perform a concept analysis. This is a creative process to help you clearly define the problem and determine critical attributes of a phenomenon.

Review a list of all items due this week in your course syllabus.

It is never too early to start brainstorming potential topics or phenomena of interest for your DNP Project. Ask yourself, “Is there something about the practice setting that needs further inquiry?” Consider your own areas of interest and passion as well as the needs of the organization and patient population. A concept analysis is a valuable exercise to more clearly define the problem and critical attributes of the phenomenon of interest.


Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Identify the primary concepts of a phenomenon of interest.
  • Perform a concept analysis to determine the key attributes of the concept or phenomenon of interest.

Before attempting to complete your learning activities for this week, review the following learning materials:


Learning Materials

Read the following articles and resources:

Examples of Concept Analysis articles:

The selected nursing concept for this analysis is compassion. Compassion is a durable concept that is largely used in nursing and healthcare. It has behavioral and emotional elements that influence the actions of nurses in their practice. Compassion is among the crucial elements and determinants of quality nursing care. Compassion has several definitions. For example, the Oxford dictionary defines it as sympathetic concern and pity for one’s suffering. The term also refers to the empathizing with a person who is suffering or harmed. It also refers to the feeling of being aware of another person’s suffering coupled with the intention to help them overcome the suffering (Tierney et al., 2019; Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Other authors have also defined it as a basic human kindness with deep awareness of others suffering coupled with the effort or wish to relieve it (Tierney et al., 2019).

Three defining attributes:

Compassion has several attributes. They include the authentic presence, noticing sufferings of others, and showing empathy towards the suffering. It is also the connectedness that nurses have with the suffering, engaging emotionally with others, and being motivated to assist or support others overcome their challenges. Compassion also has the attribute of seeking to empower the vulnerable to overcome their health problems, negotiating how to prevent or alleviate suffering, and using knowledge and skills to prevent, alleviate, or manage distress or suffering (Galetz, 2019).

1 Antecedent and 1 Consequence of the concept:

One antecedent of compassion is respect. Nurses must demonstrate respect to others for them to understand their sufferings or experiences. The respect helps them to understand the problem from the patient’s perspective and how to address it better. Respect also helps nurses to identify ethical practices that they can use to enhance the patient outcomes (Younas & Maddigan, 2019).

One consequence of compassion is trust between patient and the nurse. Compassionate care increases the trust that patients have towards the care given by the nurses. It also strengthens the professional relationship among them, which result in additional outcomes such as patient satisfaction, empowerment, and adherence to treatment plans. The strengthened trust also eliminates or reduces fear that patients could have towards healthcare systems and interventions (Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Therefore, patients are empowered to take responsibility for their health, hence, the realization of optimum outcomes in the care process.

Model Case:

A model case of compassion is a nurse involved in the care of a patient with terminal illness. The nurse must implement patient-centered interventions to promote peaceful death in such a patient. In this case, the nurse must demonstrate compassion by understanding the unique experiences of the patient, his or her sufferings, and attempt to implement interventions to minimize them. For example, the nurse administers analgesics to minimize pain in end of life care for patient’s psychological comfort and wellbeing.

Theoretical Applications of the Concept:

Dorothea Orem’s theory of self-care utilizes the concept of compassion. Accordingly, nurses must understand the experiences of their patients for them to assist the patients meet their needs. For example, nurses caring for a cancer patient understand the chronic pain that patients experience and implement interventions to reduce their suffering (Tierney et al., 2019).

Reflection:

I always apply the concept of compassion in my nursing practice. I always strive to understand what a disease means to the patient and explore evidence-based interventions to enhance treatment outcomes. I also go an extra mile to see that the additional factors that do not relate to the disease are addressed for optimum recovery. I also apply compassion by ensuring that the decisions that I make do not predispose patients to any unintended harm. Therefore, compassion is part of my professional practice.

 

NUR 700 Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper References

Galetz, E. (2019). The empathy-compassion matrix: Using a comparison concept analysis to identify care components. Nursing Forum, 54(3), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12353

Tierney, S., Bivins, R., & Seers, K. (2019). Compassion in nursing: Solution or stereotype? Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), e12271. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12271

Younas, A., & Maddigan, J. (2019). Proposing a policy framework for nursing education for fostering compassion in nursing students: A critical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(8), 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13946

Assignment 3.1: Concept Analysis Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Alternative definitions
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Thoroughly defines the concept and provides appropriate citations for the definitions.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Provides some definitions of the concept and sources for the definitions.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Defines the concept but definitions not appropriately cited.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Concept not appropriately defined and/or cited.

10 / 10 pts
Defining Attributes
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Defining attributes are identified and thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Defining attributes are identified but explanation may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some defining attributes are identified and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Defining attributes are missing or not clearly explained.

10 / 10 pts
Antecedents
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Antecedents are thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Antecedents are provided but explanations may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some antecedents are provided and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Antecedents may be missing or not clearly explained.

9 / 10 pts
Consequences
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Consequences are thoroughly explained.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Consequences are provided but explanations may not be thorough.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Some consequences are provided and may be explained.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Consequences may be missing or not clearly explained.

8 / 10 pts
Model, borderline, and contrary cases
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Describes each case thoroughly with clear, concise examples.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Describes each case somewhat clearly with examples of each.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Describes each case with some details and /or examples of each.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Describes cases but either unclear or lacking examples.

10 / 10 pts
Empirical referents
10 to >9 pts
Fully Meets Expectations

Clearly and concisely describes empirical referents in a manner that explains the presence of the concept.

9 to >6 pts
Nearly Meets Expectations

Describes empirical referents in a manner that explains the presence of the concept.

6 to >3 pts
Barely Meets Expectations

Attempts to describe empirical referents in order to explain the presence of the concept.

3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not describe empirical referents well.

9 / 10 pts
APA and Writing Scholarship
0 pts
(0% deduction) Fully Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) are correct. Professional written communication and correct grammar are used.

0 pts
(05% deduction) Nearly Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have some errors. Some errors in written communication and grammar.

0 pts
(08% deduction) Barely Meets Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have frequent errors. Frequent errors in written communication and grammar.

0 pts
(10% deduction) Does Not Meet Expectations

APA format, references, and appendices (as appropriate) have numerous and distracting errors. Written communication and grammar lack professionalism.

0 / 0 pts
Total Points: 56