NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NUR 705 Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I
Introduction
In this course, you will conduct several article critiques on articles related to your potential DNP project topic. This week, you will orient yourself with the topics of literature that you need to review for your DNP project. You should take into consideration variables, populations, and levels of evidence. You will locate an article and submit the article for consideration this week. Your critique of the article will be due in Week 4.
To help you prepare to critique the article, watch the Nursing Research—How to Critique an Article video.
Assignment Guidelines
- Complete the National Library of Medicine’s training on Using PubMed in Evidence-Based Practice (Links to an external site.).
- Search the library for a systematic review research article that is related to your DNP project.
- Select one systematic review research article that you will use for your first article review.
- Submit the link or a PDF copy of your article and your justification for the selected article. Your justification should include:
- A summary of how the article relates to your potential DNP project topic.
- The search terms you used in your search.
- The filters that you established for your search, such as year limits.
- The process you used to review the search results.
Submission
Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 2.1: Systematic Article Review—Part I page.
Conducting Research
How to Construct a Search StrategyReview the media on how to construct a search strategy.
Building a Search Strategy Transcript
Hello. In this video, you will learn how to use your PICO to build a search strategy that will be used to find resources in the databases.
So what is a search strategy? It is an organized structure of keywords and subject headings used to search a database. Let’s take a look at a completed example. It includes words found in the titles, abstracts, and subject headings of results found in the databases. By the end of this video, you will understand what all the different parts are doing.
Let us begin with the three words in all caps. They are called Boolean terms, which you do not need to remember their name, just what
they do. AND combines words and therefore narrows the search because all the terms are required to be found. In our example, each result must have at least one of the terms from each parentheses.
Secondly, OR must either have one or the other and therefore expands the search results. In our example, results can have either the phrase “adverse events” or “patient safety” but not necessarily both.
Lastly, NOT eliminates any result with that word and therefore reduces the number of hits. In our example, all hits with a word review have been removed. This will take out most of the review articles in the search. You will begin with your PICO or PICOT, which is population, intervention, comparison, outcome and there may or may not be a timeframe.
We will now work on this example. Do AEDs in the community used by non-professionals increase survival rates in heart attack patients? So my population is heart attack victims. My intervention is AED. My comparison is no AED or you can think of it as a control. The outcome is survival rates increase.
When you begin your initial search, you will want to work with only a couple of the concepts at a time. Also, you want to select the most important words from PICO to be part of your search. We will begin with part of the intervention, AED, and part of the population description, heart attack. If you have an acronym like this one, you will want to find out what it stands for before doing any searches.
You will want to perform your initial search in at least two databases. I have chosen to use PubMed and CINAHL. In PubMed, this search resulted in 205 hits. None of the first 20 or so were on my PICO. In CINAHL there were 686 hits and several of the first hits were close to my topic. Therefore, before adding anything more to the search, we will check these to see if they can help fine-tune the search. They contain the word layperson, which I can use as a keyword for my concept in my PICO non-professionals. When you look at the detailed record, you should look at the title, the major subject headings. In this example, there are subject headings for two of my concepts. Heart attack subject heading is heart arrest, and there is a subject heading for AEDs.
And lastly, you’d want to look at the abstract. Now I will add in the new concept of layperson to my search and try again in CINAHL. EBSCOhost databases remember common searches and can help you find more keywords. Just remember that in all other databases, the OR needs to be in all caps. I will now try this new search in PubMed. It results in only 17. One of the reasons why the drop in results could be that the subject headings do not match between the two databases. PubMed uses MeSH while CINAHL has its own subject headings. It appears that defibrillators automatic external is not a MeSH term.
Also in the subject heading there is a new term, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This along with the subject headings from MeSH have now been added to my search strategy. From the results in CINAHL, more search terms were discovered. Firstly, in the title of this one, we have a new word to add to our layperson or public search terms, which is community. Secondly, in the abstract, the phrase public access defibrillation was found.
Lastly, another key word for the concept of non-professional was found, which was bystander. So we add those into our search terms. And also now we are ready to add the search terms about the outcomes. Remember to use broad terms and do not include words like reduced or increased. You can also use terms that are opposite of your original concept. The goal of this example PICO is to increase survival rates, but that also means it will reduce mortality.
This is the search strategy at this point. The defibrillators part has been simplified. Also, phrases have been put in quotations, which searches for the phrase instead of each individual keyword, which should eliminate some of the hits that are not about the topic. After a few tries in PubMed and CINAHL, just putting public access in quotations worked best. The number of results in both PubMed and CINAHL were a little high. There are three possible adjustments that can be tried. Firstly, if you only want articles in this country, use the search U.S. or United States in quotations. This will remove most studies done outside the United States.
Secondly, you can use the NOT to remove studies that are not about your topic. For this example, a good one would be first responders.
Lastly, you can limit the search of the terms to just the subject headings. Databases handle subject headings differently. In CINAHL and other EBSCOhost databases, it’s best to use the dropdown choices. On the other hand in PubMed and Cochrane, you need to use the code for the MeSH heading.
Things to remember when you are building a search strategy: This is a process and it will change over time as you find more articles about your PICO. If you find what you think of as the perfect article, use the words found in it to rework your search strategy. And remember, you can always contact the health sciences librarian for assistance in developing your search strategy.
Week 2: Literature Reviews: Integrative, Systematic, and Meta-Analysis
Lesson 1: Literature Reviews: Integrative, Systematic, and Meta-Analysis
Introduction
Using research findings in practice begins with reviewing the literature. In this lesson, you will learn about the types of literature reviews and how they can be used as a starting point for evidence evaluation. You will learn how to conduct a search strategy to optimize your findings.
| Article Review—Part I Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|
Appropriate Selection of Research Article
|
|
1 / 1 pts
|
|
Justification of Article Selection
|
|
2 / 2 pts
|
|
Documentation and Mechanics
|
|
2 / 2 pts
|
| Total Points: 5 | ||