NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
In conducting research into the satisfaction with preoperative teaching and communication, the goal is to have this patient population conduct anonymous surveys (Cogrove & Keeler, 2021). I would gather my research by arranging private meetings with this population of patients prior to any administration of medications, as a patient can not give informed consent after they have received any mind altering treatments (Aaron, et al. 2021). Educating patients should be of the upmost of importance when gaining informed consent from a patient to participate in a research study. Educate the patient that their identity will stay anonymous and their answers will most effect their care, in fact the study is to find truthful answers in an attempt to improve patient satisfaction (Aaron, et al. 2021). Never be dishonest with the patient and answer any all questions they may have fully and honestly. Then be sure that all of their information remains private and nothing ties them to their survey (Aaron, et al. 2021). Instead identify their response by the procedure they are having done (Aaron, et al. 2021). Only ask simple and straightforward questions that are related to the topics you are gathering research about. I would use a simple random sampling of the population being interviewed, to help with both anonymity and randomization (Colgrove & Keeler, 2021). While a simple random sampling will still eradicate some of the patients anonymous surveys, which I would rather not do, it would make the compilation of research more manageable (Mantri, et al. 2020). I think the anonymity, randomization of all patients from all backgrounds, and manageability are all strengths of a simple random sampling, but the lack of some patients very important and valuable surveys is a weakness. Possible distrust by the patient of their anonymity are weaknesses of a simple random sampling. If the researcher is attempting to meet with each surgery patient in a facility prior to the initiation of any of their actual pre surgery interventions, the recruitment of participants should not be terribly difficult (Mantri, et al. 2020). After the completion of the anonymous surveys, a manageable number of surveys is selected and a number is randomly chosen. Let’s say the number selected is 5, every 5th survey is included in the final research to determine the overall satisfaction of surgery patients related to their pre-operative teaching and communication (Mantra, et al. 2020).
Colgrove Curtis, A., & Keeler, C. (2021). Sampling Design in Nursing Research. AJN American Journal of Nursing, 121(3), 53–57. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bradley.edu/10.1097/01.naj.0000737304.14564.51
Aaron, B., Glover, A., Sterling, E., Downs, S., & Lesandrini, J. (2021). Impact of a Novel Method of Ethics Education on Nurse Leaders’ Capacity for Moral Decision-Making:: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Nurse Leader, 19(6), 639–645. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bradley.edu/10.1016/j.mnl.2021.03.014
Mantri, S., Lawson, J. M., Wang, Z., & Koenig, H. G. (2020). Identifying Moral Injury in Healthcare Professionals: The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP. Journal of Religion & Health, 59(5), 2323–2340. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bradley.edu/10.1007/s10943-020-01065-w
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
Thanks for the insightful discussion post. From the information given, I agree that educating patients should be of the upmost of
importance when gaining informed consent from a patient to participate in a research study (Tiselius, 2021). The importance of education, informed consent, and privacy in research cannot be underestimated. Each of these elements is essential in ensuring that research is conducted ethically and responsibly. Without proper training and education, research participants may not be able to give truly informed consent (Martins & Sani, 2020). They may not understand the risks and benefits involved in a study, or they may not be aware of their rights as research subjects. As such, it is essential that investigators take the time to educate potential participants about the study before asking them to sign a consent form (O’Sullivan et al., 2020). Privacy is also critical in safeguarding the rights of research subjects. Any information collected during a study must be kept confidential and secure. Participants must feel confident that their personal information will not be shared with third parties.
References
Martins, P. C., & Sani, A. I. (2020). Consent for research on violence against children: dilemmas and contradictions. Societies, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010015 (Links to an external site.)
O’Sullivan, L., Sukumar, P., Crowley, R., McAuliffe, E., & Doran, P. (2020). Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis. BMJ open, 10(9), e037994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994 (Links to an external site.)
Tiselius, E. (2021). Informed Consent: An overlooked part of ethical research in interpreting studies. INContext: Studies in Translation and Interculturalism, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54754/incontext.v1i1.4
Sample Answer 3 for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1: Random Sampling
Yes. I believe that we are patient advocates, and must always have their best interest at the forefront, even if it means sacrificing information. A patient must be fully and completely educated in a manner in which they understand. Everyone learns differently and they have different levels of education. People must be taught differently, and having the participant explain, or teach back, what they understand guarantees that they comprehend what you are attempting to explain to them. Not only does it need to be explained that personal information isn’t going to be shared with a third party, but some patients may fear retaliation. So, the importance of privacy in that regard is important, as well. A patient must also be made aware that no one, especially the people providing care to them, will know what they have said about how they have responded to the survey questions. This would also help in ensuring more realistic results, as the participant may feel more comfortable being honest about how they felt receiving the education and communication.