NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Grand Canyon University NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Introduction & Purpose of the Presentation
The dissemination of evidence-based practice (EBP) information is an important part of effective care delivery for providers as it allows stakeholders to implement different changes to meet patient expectations. Dissemination involves the spread and sharing of clinical, research, and theoretical findings with goals of transitioning new knowledge to points of care (DeNisco, 2019). Dissemination requires organizations to have effective culture and be ready for change as well as selection of the best EBP model to implement new change. The use of Fall TIPS to reduce falls in medical-surgical units reduces the adverse effects of fall, improves patient safety and overall satisfaction. The purpose of this presentation is to disseminate the outcomes of the proposed EBP project for effective implementation in the medical-surgical unit to reduce the prevalence of patient falls.
EBP Project
The evidence-based practice process involve the integration of research findings, clinician’s care experience and patient preferences. EBP projects focus on optimizing providers and team conduct to support changes for patients to get quality care and reduce adverse effects of falls like injuries and associated complications and costs. Patient satisfaction and engagement are important while implementing EBP in health care settings. In this case, the need to reduce falls through tailoring interventions for patient safety (TIPS) is essential to offering quality care and considering the concerns that patients may have and critical to improving their response to safety measures by providers
PICOT Statement
Among hospitalized adult patients in medical-surgical units (P) does the use of TIPS toolkit as a bundled care approach (I) compared to normal falls prevention approach (C) reduce the prevalence of falls by 20%(O) within 6 months (T)?
Organizational Culture and Readiness
Organizational culture which entails values, mission, vision and operational efficiencies is important on implementing or introducing changes to nursing units or workplace. The implementation of EBP project proposal to reduce falls through Fall TIPS approach requires organizations to have a change-oriented culture and values. Evaluation is essential as it allows project team to determine the level of readiness and acceptance of change. In this case, the organizational structure in the medical-surgical unit is positive. The findings from the Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool (OCAT) created by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) shows that the unit has decentralized structure that allows engagement and participation of nurses to implement changes to improve the quality of patient care (Ratnapalan, 2019.
The OCAT tool assesses overall readiness and highlights organizational capacities and strengths. Based on the model, the overall organizational culture and readiness for change is positive since the unit as part of the entire facility has capacities and strengths. These include having effective teamwork to improve communication, integration of providers’ perspectives when implementing new approaches to care, and better communication and effective collaboration among the internal stakeholders. Data analysis tools are also essential to improving overall efficacy of the proposed solution (DeNisco, 2019). The organizational culture also focuses on health promotion and saving lives through involvement of all stakeholders at different levels of care delivery.
Problem Statement
Falls are a major concern and public health issue because they affect quality of care and patient safety. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2021) observes that one in every four older people experiences falls. Close to 800,000 individuals are hospitalized each year due to falls, especially in critical care settings. more than 95% of hip fracture occur due to falls and falls are the most prevalent cause of traumatic brain injuries (Heng et al., 2020). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) categorize falls as never events since a majority of them are preventable. Falls also increase hospital stays and increase cost of care. Therefore, reducing falls is a critical part of improving patient safety ad overall care delivery (PSNet, 2019). Existing literature supports the use of Fall TIPS as an EBP intervention to reduce and prevent falls.
Literature Review
The proposed interventions should be appropriate through a review of existing literature consisting of previous research studies to support implementation and expected benefits to the targeted population. In this case, through a comprehensive search of the literature, one can ascertain if the interventions meets the stakeholders’ goals and aspirations (Zhao et al., 2018). The literature review for the project involved the definition and use of terms associated with Fall TIPS and its benefits for patients, especially in medical-surgical settings. The review also employed appropriate search engines and databases associated with the nursing issue to ensure that the generated articles focus on the problem under investigation (Khan et al., 2018). The main inclusion criteria included article published within the last five years, articles that capture aspects of the PICOT question and focus on effective interventions to reduce falls and efficacy of Fall TIPS implementation.
The proposed project reviewed several research studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria to ascertain support for the intervention to enhance patient safety and quality of care through fall prevention using the Fall TIPS model. Literature synthesis and critical analysis show increased support for the intervention of using Fall TIPS model to reduce falls. Studies by LeLaurin et al. (2019); Xia et al. (2022); Kelly (2022), and Dykes et al. (2020) agree that fall prevention bundles through the TIPS model reduce incidences of falls and improve overall patent safety. The studies show that Fall TIPS is effective and should be implemented on diverse settings that include medical-surgical units because of their benefits like being customized to meet patient needs and situations. The studies also emphasize the need for effective guideline for providers to enhance their adoption of fall TIPS in their practice settings.
Change Model or Framework
The selected model is the Iowa EBP framework. The Iowa model focuses on the entire healthcare system and stakeholders who comprise of patients, practitioners, and infrastructure. The framework uses a problem-solving and implores staff to question the current nursing practices and if they can improve care through using current evidence. The model is effective for the project as it focuses on promoting quality care using EBP interventions (DeNisco, 2019). The initial stage of the model is identification and selection of a health problem while the second stage involved determining if the issue is healthcare organization’s priority areas for patient care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The third stage requires reflection about the issue of interest and engaging stakeholders while the fourth stage is to identify availability and merit of the chosen evidence (Cullen et al., 2020). The fifth stage entails implementation of a pilot change based on the available evidence and its credibility. The sixth stage is to appraise the pilot practice change based on the degree of success and subsequent dissemination of findings to the providers and organizations.
Implementation Plan
The project will be set in the medical-surgical unit/ward with the patients as the main participants. They will have informed consent and voluntary accept to participate in the study. The implementation timeline would be six months. The timeline will have different aspects as defined by the project scope and activities. Nurse training and requirement definition as well a project schedule will be part of these activities. Resources needed will include both financial and human for the implementation of the project. The project will employ a qualitative approach in collecting data. The qualitative approach is appropriate as it allows the use of different techniques like interviews, observation, review of literature and even focus groups (Tang, 2019). The implementation team will use an audit tool and a patient survey. The survey tool will collect feedback and opinions from participants on the effectiveness of the fall TIPS framework. Using these tools will help determine the overall effects of the Fall TIPS.
The delivery of the intervention will entail having an inter-professional team consisting of different healthcare providers in the medical-surgical unit. The interventions will entail staff training on all components of the TIPS bundles, development of safe toileting, effective communication and patient education. The project will have different stakeholders who would include nurses and nurse leaders, nurse managers, project team and manager, trainers and patients as well as their families (Amit-Aharon et al., 2019). Others will be organizational management and health information technology vendors. The implementation plan will encounter barriers and challenges like resistance to change, limited resources to implement the plan, and insufficient knowledge and skills by nurses on Fall TIPS (Pop et al. (2020). There will also be facilitators like sufficient resource allocation. The project’s overall feasibility is high due to its cost-effectiveness and associated benefits to patients and the healthcare system.
Evaluation Plan
The main outcome is to reduce patient falls in the medical-surgical unit by 30% in six months of its implementation. The Fall TIPS will enable nurses and other providers to customize fall prevention intervention based patient’s conditions and preferences and not a one-fits-all approach. The EBP project will employ qualitative design implying that it will use questionnaires and focus groups to collect data. It will also observation to determine the level of implementation (Grove et al., 2019). The statistical test in this case would be the t-test because of its suitability to the project.
Using data collected through semi-structured questionnaires, the researchers will measure patient outcomes and experiences (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2020). They will then tabulate the data to determine if there are changes after the implementation of the Fall TIPS. The research will the deploy computation tools to determine rates of improvement based on the reduction of falls within the unit. Strategies to improve outcome will include re-examination of the implemented intervention through analyzing the process and all associated components at each level. The team will also formulate timelines and explore corrective measures to improve outcomes . The sustenance of the EBP will entail training, continuous monitoring of quality care, and creating teams that will review areas of concern and ensure that Fall TIPS integrate patients and concerns.
References
Amit-Aharon, A., Melnikov, S., & Warshawski, S. (2020). The effect of evidence-based
practice perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation
on nursing students’ future implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of
professional nursing, 36(6), 497-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.001.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2021). Facts About Falls.
https://www.cdc.gov/falls/facts.html
Grove, S. K., & Cipher, D. J. (2019). Statistics for Nursing Research-e-book: A workbook for evidence-based
practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Lengnick-Hall, R., Willging, C. E., Hurlburt, M. S., & Aarons, G. A. (2020). Incorporators, early investors, and
learners: A longitudinal study of organizational adaptation during EBP implementation and
sustainment. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01031-w
Melnyk, B. M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing &
Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
Rebekah, G., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Statistical analysis in nursing research. Indian Journal of Continuing
Nursing Education,19(1), 62-70. https://www.ijcne.org/text.asp?2018/19/1/62/28649
Kelley, R. J. (2022). Preventing Falls in the Surgical Setting by
Implementing a Fall Prevention Bundle.
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/18736
Xia, L., Zheng, Y., Lin, Z., Chen, P., Mei, K., Zhao, J., … & Gu, Z.
(2022). Gap between risk factors and prevention strategies? A
nationwide survey of fall prevention among medical and
surgical patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(8), 2472-
LeLaurin, J. H., & Shorr, R. I. (2019). Preventing falls in hospitalized
patients: state of the science. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 35(2),
273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.007
Patient Safety Net (2019). Falls. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/falls
Achieving patient safety implores nurses and other healthcare professionals to develop interventions that improve quality care and reduces occurrence of hospital acquired infections (HAIs). The use of evidence-based practice interventions like hand hygiene protocols and measures that include handwashing with soap and water alongside sanitizers can prevent and reduce the prevalence of hospital acquired infections (Zhao et al., 2017). Nurses in pediatric care settings should set high levels of hygiene to minimize the occurrence of HAIs in these settings. The integration of EBP interventions mitigates the increasing prevalence of HAIs and their associated cost burden to patients, their families and the health care system (Akanji et al., 2017). Hospital acquired infections constitute a significant part of the increased mortality and morbidity and poor outcomes among pediatric patients. The purpose of this presentation is to detail the evidence-based practice project proposal on hand hygiene measures involving handwashing with soap and water alongside use of hand sanitizer by healthcare workers, especially nurses, in reducing and preventing the occurrence of hospital acquired infections in pediatric care settings.
Leaders should engage in patient and employee advocacy. Advocacy for staff has a favorable influence on the overall quality of care that patients get at a facility. For example, the participation of workers in decision-making, particularly on issues that directly impact them, such as flexible work hours, stimulates employees to work with a purpose for the benefit of the whole workforce. Employees are more motivated to work for the organization when they are campaigning for a bigger pay raise and a more favorable working environment (Rosa et al., 2020). Being motivated to work means that health care practitioners will adopt evidence-based best practices, which are crucial in providing high-quality health care services.
Evidence-based practice continues to be a critical component of enhancing care delivery among patients in different settings. The use of EBP entails incorporation of research evidence together with patient preferences and clinician’s care experience. Evidence-based practice aims at optimization of provider and team behavior to support changes in patient conduct to attain quality care, and provides education to reduce the risks of hospital acquired infections and improve different aspects of care provision (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). EBP also encourages the use of resources and services, and improvement in patients and their families’ satisfaction (Zhao et al., 2018). The EBP project will also focus on enhancing patient safety, improving adherence to hand hygiene measures, and improving outcomes and quality management to reduce adverse events. The project also focuses on decreasing the overall cost of infections, length of stay, and readmissions, and ensure that providers can make better care decisions in managing adverse events resulting from HAIs. The PICOT Question for the project is
Among healthcare worker in pediatric settings (P), how does handwashing with soap and water alongside hand sanitizer (I), compared to handwashing with soap and water alone (C), reduce hospital acquired infections (O), with six months (T)?
Organizational culture is an essential part of implementing change as it mirrors values, mission, and vision and employee perception to adopting new ways of doing things. A decentralized and hierarchical culture where employees get involved in decision-making and has robust values and norms leads to effective implementation of EBP project proposal. The proposed structure enhances employee motivation and diversification. Decentralization improves communication and ensures implementation of new approaches to doing things to enhance quality care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Organizations ready to implement the proposed EBP interventions should focus on patient-centered care and health promotion to save lives in pediatric settings.
The project uses the Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool (OCAT) developed by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The tool assesses overall readiness to enhance health interventions in organizations. The tool identifies substantive capacities and strengths that exist and the need for more to attain expected outcomes. Implementing the proposed EBP requires organizations to have capabilities and resources with a superb culture based on their mission, purpose and best values. Threats to readiness include need for resources to implement the project and technologies to reduce HAIs. Teamwork leads to effective flow of information to implement the project and attain expected outcomes.
Organizations that seek to implement the proposed EBP should enhance their patient-handling processes with a focus on improved quality care to reduce infections by better hand hygiene measures and protocols. Data-analysis tool using a collaborative approach will enhance dissemination of evidence to the entire care team. The deployment of Trans-theoretical model will allow the organizations to prepare for change by aligning their interventions with their needs. These include skills’ training and motivation policies to enact changes to focus on solutions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The integration of technology is also critical to enhancing organizations’ readiness since it improves gathering of intelligence.
The stakeholders include healthcare professionals in these settings comprising of nurses, physicians and other professionals and the management. External stakeholders comprise of patients and their familiescare (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Further, the integration of the Project team and management highlights the importance of ensuring that the organization is ready while use of health information technologies like Telehealth leads to better understanding of the underlying issues to enhance patient safety based on existing deployment and their role in enhancing access and quality care.
Hospital acquired infections are a concern in healthcare as they impact positive patient outcomes and patient safety. Healthcare workers, especially nurses, transmit infections to patients through poor hand hygiene measures and protocols in their practice environment. Pediatric patients have increased susceptibility to suffering from infections due to their low levels of immunity (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Imperatively, nurses and other providers must develop interventions to prevent and control the prevalence of nosocomial infections and guarantee quality care by using evidence-based practice interventions like handwashing with soap and water alongside use of hand sanitizer(Khan et al., 2018). The initiative focuses on enhancing hand hygiene protocols by nurses to help reduce most prevalent infections like central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia and surgical sites infections.
Week 8 Assignment
Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Develop a 10-15-slide presentation with comprehensive speaker’s notes that covers all of the major areas of your evidence-based practice proposal.
You will need to post a rough draft of your evidence-based practice presentation to the Main Forum in Topic 8 DQ 1 for peer feedback.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references compiled from the final project should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Resources
Collapse All
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 22 and 23 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
View Resource
Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference
Read “Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference,” by Douglas, Jackson, Woods,
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/innovations-research-dissemination-participants/docview/2327516899/se-2?accountid=7374
NUR 590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Loom
Loom is a free video recording tool that allows you send messages through shareable videos. For assistance on installing the softwa
… Read More
https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/115015942807-Third-Party-Contact-Information
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource
Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation
Read “Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation,” by Bodin and McDaniel, from Alabama Nurse (2019).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=136923973&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities
Read “Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities,” by Cunningham-
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/engagement-community-stakeholders-develop/docview/2443277489/se-2?accountid=7374
Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge
Read “Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge,” by Sawaya, from International Journal of Chi
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123698144&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory
Read “Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory,” by Ligita, Francis, Wicking, Harvey, and Nurjannah, fro
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/using-storylines-bilingual-dissemination-grounded/docview/2327522196/se-2?accountid=7374
Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects
Read “Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects,” by Siedleck
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR590 Week 8 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation – Rubric
Collapse All
Introduction
6 points
Criteria Description
Introduction
- 5: Excellent
6 points
The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
- 4: Good
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.
- 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
12 points
Criteria Description
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.
Problem Statement and Literature Review
18 points
Criteria Description
Problem Statement and Literature Review
- 5: Excellent
18 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.
- 4: Good
16.56 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.
- 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
12 points
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
- 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
- 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.
- 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
6 points
Criteria Description
Conclusion
- 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.
- 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
- 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.