coursework-banner

NURS 6051 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

NURS 6051 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

NURS 6051 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

This presentation will discuss the concept of a knowledge worker. It explains nursing informatics and discusses the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. In addition, I will present the hypothetical scenario that might benefit from the collection and application of data. I will explore the data that can be used, how it might be collected, and the knowledge derived from the data.

A knowledge worker plays a key role in the organization in generating knowledge.  They obtain, maneuver, interpret and apply information to carry out multidisciplinary, complex organizational work (Field & Chan, 2018). Besides, knowledge workers analyze data and use their expertise to address problems, generate ideas, and develop new products and services.

Knowledge work is often complex, and knowledge workers need certain skills, abilities, and acquaintance with factual and theoretical knowledge (Field & Chan, 2018).  Therefore, knowledge workers must obtain, access, recall, and apply data, interact well with others, and have the ability and motivation to obtain and enhance these skills.

Knowledge workers’ roles include making decisions whereby they work with ideas. Their duties focus on intellectual rather than physical power and are characterized by non-repetitive tasks (Field & Chan, 2018). In addition, they use various methods and techniques to address problems and are authorized to decide what work methods to employ to complete their job tasks. Knowledge workers include: scientists, professionals, educators, and information system designers.

Nursing informatics is a specialty that incorporates nursing science with analytical sciences and information management. It seeks to discover, define, manage, and convey data, information, and knowledge in nursing practice (Moore et al., 2020). Nursing informatics supports nurses, the interprofessional health care team, healthcare consumers, patients, and stakeholders in decision-making in various roles and settings to attain desired outcomes. It supports this through information structures, processes, and technology (Moore et al., 2020).

Nursing informatics skills are applied to:

Create data structures and software tools to support nursing practice (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).

Keep EHR in line with best practices for data management, processing, and organization.

Apply analytics in evaluating and facilitating nursing processes (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).

Facilitate communication among healthcare and IT professionals.

Train providers on the best use of EHRs and CDSS (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).

Nurse leaders are knowledge workers. Nurse leader competencies at the organization or system level are connected to knowledge management. Nurse leaders’ roles as knowledge workers include: Facilitating organizational learning by supporting nurses as they find, share, and develop knowledge to advance nursing practice.  Developing and improving knowledge worker skills aligned to obtaining and analyzing data and examining clinical trends and patterns (Carroll, 2019).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6051 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker

They develop innovative approaches to improve access to health care, improve the quality of care, and reduce healthcare costs.

Nurse leaders focus on utilizing technology and developing electronic systems that will enhance data collection and analysis (Carroll, 2019).

Nurse leaders analyze data to establish information that is valuable in enhancing the delivery of patient care and improving the quality of care and health outcomes (Carroll, 2019).

NURS 6051 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge WorkerPatient falls among geriatrics is a hypothetical scenario that would benefit from collecting and applying data in our healthcare organization. They result in severe injuries on patients, such as head trauma and fractures, which prolong hospital stay and increase healthcare costs (Venema et al., 2019). Data that could be used in relation to patient falls include the number of patient falls and common conditions of patients who suffer falls (Lucero et al., 2019). In addition, data on the length of hospitalization from falls and patient costs incurred from falls can be used to address the issue of falls.

Patient falls data can be collected from patients’ records and a hospital’s incidence reporting system (Lucero et al., 2019). The data can provide knowledge on patients’ at the highest risk of falls and the factors that put patients at risk of falls in the inpatient units. Data on the diseases with the highest falls can offer insight into the patients’ conditions that health providers should take additional measures to prevent falls (Lucero et al., 2019). Furthermore, the data can enlighten nurses on the gaps in patient care that contribute to patient falls and the measures they should implement to address the issue (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017).

References

Carroll, W. M. (2019). The synthesis of nursing knowledge and predictive analytics. Nursing management50(3), 15-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000553503.78274.f7

Field, J. C., & Chan, X. W. (2018). Contemporary knowledge workers and the boundaryless work–life interface: Implications for the human resource management of the knowledge workforce. Frontiers in psychology9, 2414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02414

Lucero, R. J., Lindberg, D. S., Fehlberg, E. A., Bjarnadottir, R. I., Li, Y., Cimiotti, J. P., … & Prosperi, M. (2019). A data-driven and practice-based approach to identify risk factors associated with hospital-acquired falls: Applying manual and semi-and fully-automated methods. International journal of medical informatics122, 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.006

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Moore, E. C., Tolley, C. L., Bates, D. W., & Slight, S. P. (2020). A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(5), 798-807. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz231

Venema, D. M., Skinner, A. M., Nailon, R., Conley, D., High, R., & Jones, K. J. (2019). Patient and system factors associated with unassisted and injurious falls in hospitals: an observational study. BMC geriatrics19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1368-8

Hi Rezel,

Indeed technology has helped to reduce the cases of hospital readmission rates. Dissanayake et al. (2020) explain Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that are integrated into HER systems to guide practitioners during the health-related decision-making processes. The system presents the patient’s information in an appropriate manner and format and at the appropriate time. For instance, the alert-based CDSS has three components, including KB, which contains patient and medical information. This user interface enhances communication of the user and the interference engine, which provides the platform for the system’s actual functionality. CDSS promotes clinical reasoning by providing a platform for practitioners to obtain and analyze patient data that will enhance effective quality care delivery (Dissanayake et al., 2020). Furthermore, Health Information Technology (HIT)-based discharge care intervention programs have been established in emergency settings. They have proven more effective in reducing hospital readmission rates as they ensure adequate care transition to the patient after discharge (Abraham et al., 2022).

References

Abraham, J., Meng, A., Tripathy, S., Kitsiou, S., & Kannampallil, T. (2022). Effect of health information technology (HIT)-based discharge transition interventions on patient readmissions and emergency room visits: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association29(4), 735-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac013

Dissanayake, P. I., Colicchio, T. K., & Cimino, J. J. (2020). Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz169

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.
25 pts

Develop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good
The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.
15 pts

Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

24 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
35 pts

PowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 pts

Resources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good
Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor
Presentation includes: 1 or no resources.
10 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts