coursework-banner

NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay

NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay

NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay

The healthcare industry is dynamic and organizational change is thus inevitable. The passage of HITACH Act ushered in an era wherein several healthcare organizations adopted the usage of electronic health record. My healthcare facility happened to adopt the change later when I was already working with them. The change from using papers to store data to using technology was a major cultural shock to a majority of the facility’s workforce. Suffice it to say, there was resistance to change since most employees felt that they were not consulted during the formative stages of the project (Boonstra, Versluis, & Vos, 2014). Indeed, several things did not occur appropriately such as effective communication during the conception of the idea. Moreover, the change managers that oversaw the implementation of the project did not have the requisite knowledge and competence, which hampered the process. Moreover, the complex nature of the workflow process during the implementation of the project affected the change process. As such, it is important to say that the change process did not go well.

The correlation between the organizational change vis-à-vis the use of stakeholders had a direct correlation. The organizational leadership failed to consult the personnel during the conception of the idea and even its implementation (Chan, Kharrazi, Parikh, & Ford, 2016). As such, the employees felt that they did not own the project, which affected its success. Moreover, the leadership did not hire the right project managers. As such, the project did not have proper support right from organizational leadership, to the manager and the workforce. The absence of consultations and effective communication meant that the project failed to have workable workflow, which impacted its acceptability among the workforce. Thus, the absence of stakeholder consultation negatively affected the success of the organizational change project.

References

Boonstra, A., Versluis, A., & Vos, J. F. (2014). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC health services research, 14(1), 370.

Chan, K. S., Kharrazi, H., Parikh, M. A., & Ford, E. W. (2016). Assessing electronic health record implementation challenges using item response theory. Am J Manag Care, 22(12), e409-e415.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Forecasting Organizational Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Recommend strategies to lead organizational change
  • Justify plans for implementing and managing organizational change in organizational/workplace settings
  • Create plans for communicating proposed changes to stakeholders
  • Recommend risk mitigation plans when managing organizational changes
Due By Assignment
Week 10, Days 1–7 Read the Learning Resources.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 11, Day 1 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 11, Day 2 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Chapter 4, “Practice Model Design, Implementation, and Evaluation” (pp. 99–154)

Cullen, L., & Adams, S. L. (2012). Planning for implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(4), 222–230.

Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organizational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51-66.

Seijts, G. H., & Gandz, J. (2016). Transformational change and leader character. Business Horizons, 61(2), 239-249.NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay

Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C. B., Tomson, G., …Eldh, A. C. (2016). Developing leadership in managers to facilitate the implementation of national guideline recommendations: A process evaluation of feasibility and usefulness. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(8), 477–486. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35. Retrieved from http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3183_5015382bcf9183a74ef7e79b0a941f65.pdf

Required Media

TEDx. (2013, January). Six keys to leading positive change: Rosabeth Moss Kanter at TEDxBeaconStreet [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owU5aTNPJbs

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).

· A description of the changes being proposed.

· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Presentation provides an accurate and detailed executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace.

Presentation accurately and completely describes in detail the changes being proposed.

Presentation accurately and thoroughly details justifications for the changes, including a thorough and complete explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Presentation provides an accurate executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace.

Presentation accurately describes the changes being proposed.

Presentation accurately justifies the changes, including an accurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation vaguely or inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague or inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation vaguely and inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague and inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace, or is missing.

· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.

· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).

· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.

· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.

Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the changes proposed.

Presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

Presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management by title/role that is detailed.

Presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.

Presentation accurately and thoroughly describes in detail risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Presentation accurately details the type and scope of the changes proposed.

Presentation accurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

Presentation accurately identifies a change management by title/role.

Presentation accurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.

Presentation accurately describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.

Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Include a narrated presentation that is 5–6 minutes in length. Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the presentation. Presentation should be aesthetically organized and easy to follow with an introduction, purpose statement, and conclusion

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Narrated presentation adequately summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the presentation.

Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the presentation.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the presentation or is missing. Audio recording is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the presentation, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Total Points: 100