NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

Walden University NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University   NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

The introduction for the Walden University   NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: on NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

Sample Answer for NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

As referenced in Week 2, Discussion 2, nurses are perceived as having very high ethical standards (Gallup, 2013). Doctorally prepared nurses should be able to consider ethical issues from multiple viewpoints. In this week’s media presentation, the experts discuss ethical challenges encountered by nurses as they assume leadership positions and as they engage in research.

The success of healthcare organizations in reaching economic, patient happiness, and quality of care goals is mostly determined by nursing leadership’s leadership qualities (Anders et al., 2021). A successful nurse leader combines the attributes shown by managers and leaders to direct and implement changes, bring innovation, empower those around them. A nurse leader is able to use the influence and power vested upon them by colleagues to bring practical changes to improve practice and quality of care. Nurse leaders can assess and evaluate, create interventions where needed and promote critical thinking processes.

Nurses are important links in healthcare delivery considering that they interact most with the patients. The interactions subject them to high cases of the ethical dilemma of which they are expected to uphold high standards of ethical values. The DNP nurses encounter various ethical issues including a case where a nurse prescribes a medication to the patient but the patient does not want to take the medicine because their cultural values do not allow it (Haahr et al., 2019). A second example involves a scenario where research practices where the nurse may explore social patterns and how they affect health outcomes. In this case, the nurse may focus on the sexual orientation and while the study aims at providing useful information for EBP implementation, it could expose the participants’ sexual identity and thus compromise the need for confidentiality (Van der et al., 2017).

The nurses must evaluate their practices to ensure that their actions result in no harm to the patients. The issues encountered by the DNP nurse are similar to the once experienced in the course of practice; though, the issues related to the research may be more challenging. For example, while it is important to keep the patients’ information confidential, the healthcare providers have also to share such data in determining the determinants of health and appropriate health interventions to engage in (Aitamaa et al., 2019). Furthermore, the issue of cultural differences is common and all healthcare providers are likely to encounter them (Rainer et al., 2018).

In conclusion, ethical principles guide healthcare providers on how to address emerging ethical issues. Ethical issues are prone in the healthcare system and so nurses and other healthcare providers must be prepared to handle them in the right way possible without compromising the patients’ values and dignity.

Reference

Aitamaa, E., Suhonen, R., Puukka, P., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2019). Ethical problems in nursing management – a cross-sectional survey about solving problems. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4245-4

Haahr, A., Norlyk, A., Martinsen, B., & Dreyer, P. (2019). Nurses’ experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019832941

Rainer, J., Schneider, J. K., & Lorenz, R. A. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(19-20), 3446-3461. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14542

Van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., Cook, J., Leiserowitz, A., Ranney, M., Lewandowsky, S., Árvai, J., & Weber, E. U. (2017). Culture versus cognition is a false dilemma. Nature Climate Change, 7(7), 457-457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3323

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

When a pregnant lady is brain dead, she cannot acknowledge the fetus. Therefore, the mother lacks the moral responsibility to keep the fetus alive (Akhyari, Lichtenberg & Boeken, 2019; Paternoster et al., 2017; Staff & Nash, 2017). Being uninsured and lacking an advance directive that states that the mother intends to be kept alive to save the unborn child, prolonging life is considered unethical. In the case of a 26-year-old woman who is 20 weeks pregnant, ethical and legal considerations are vital.

The Hendricks/Smith Model posits that one needs to undertake various processes before making a decision. The very first undertaking would be to gather data or conduct an assessment on the patient (Fero, Herrick, 7 Hu, 2011). There are several relevant data concerning the patient such as lack of insurance, the position of the mother, the position of the fetus and the status of the mother. The case reveals that the patient is brain dead. Secondly, the model stipulates that one needs to make a diagnosis of the patient, in which case the patient is brain dead. Third, planning for the various outcomes need to occur. In the present case, there are two options: supporting the mother’s position which is to keep the lady alive until a Cesarean delivery is conducted or supporting the husband who wants it to be terminated in order for his wife to be relieved. Following the planning process, Hendricks/Smith model states that the case manager must now make a decision. According to Nishimura et al. (2016), the older the baby when its mother is confirmed brain-dead, the higher its chances of survival. In the present case, and given the information about the husband’s lack of support for the pregnancy, it would be prudent for the case manager to prioritize the life of the fetus by supporting the mother’s position. Therefore, the mother will be kept on the life support machine until such a time that the Cesarean delivery option will be implemented. Thereafter, the state of the woman will be evaluated to determine if she will continue using the life support or she will be terminated.

I agree with the analysis of my peers because based on the Herrick/Smith model, a baby born at 20 weeks will have a 20 to 30 percent survival chances and a 40 percent chance of seriously being disabled (Pikto-Pietkiewicz et al., 2019). The older the baby, the less the risk of severe disability. In the scenario, the best ethical outcome would be to maintain the pregnancy until such as time that a Cesarean is conducted. The absence of an advance directive from the pregnant woman makes this the best ethical decision. Adopting the African-American culture for the scenario does not alter the chosen option. In the African-American population, terminating the woman’s life would be tantamount to killing, which is not supported by the culture.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: on NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

References

Akhyari, P., Lichtenberg, A., & Boeken, U. (2019). Successful transplantation of a heart donated 5 months after brain death of a pregnant young woman. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 38(10), 1121.

Fero, L. J., Herrick, C. A., & Hu, J. (2011). Introduction to care coordination and nursing management. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Nishimura, T., Kohama, K., Osako, T., Yamada, T., Tanaka, H., Nakao, A., & Kotani, J. (2016). Case of 24-week fetus delivered from mother on life support with brain-death from suicide attempt: Ethical issues associated with severe complications. Acta Medica Okayama, 70(5), 389-392.

Paternoster, M., Saccone, G., Maruotti, G. M., Bianco, C., Casella, C., Buccelli, C., & Martinelli, P. (2017). Ethical challenges in pregnant women with brain injury. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

Pikto-Pietkiewicz, I., Okniński, A., Wójtowicz, R., & Wójtowicz, M. (2019). The Management of a Thirteen Weeks Pregnant Woman Rendered Brain-Dead Following a Ruptured Aneurysm. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 5(3), 111.

Staff, L., & Nash, M. (2017). Brain death during pregnancy and prolonged corporeal support of the body: A critical discussion. Women and Birth, 30(5), 354-360.

NURS 8000 Discussion: Ethics

Also Read:

NURS 8000 WEEK 2 Discussion 2: AACN Competencies and the Walden Mission, Vision, and Outcomes

NURS 8000 Discussion 1: Learning Online Week 2

To prepare:

• Reflect on ethical challenges that you have encountered in your nursing practice.
• Think about the information the experts shared in this week’s media presentation, focusing on the ethical challenges they have encountered as nurse leaders or scientists, as well as information presented in other Learning Resources.
• With this information in mind, consider what new ethical challenges you may face once you obtain your doctoral degree.

Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

• Describe two or more significant ethical issues relevant to the DNP- or PhD-prepared nurse.
• Explain how these issues might compare to the types of issues you have already encountered in your practice.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:

• Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
• Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
• Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
• Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
• Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
• Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.