NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Walden University NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Literature searches in preparation for conducting a comprehensive literature review are crucial in generating new search ideas, improving individual knowledge concerning the topic at hand, and evaluating commonly used methodologies (Xiao, & Watson, 2019). Focusing on improving my knowledge in psychology, I followed several steps in locating relevant updated pieces of literature for review. The first step was to develop a research question, followed by a mind map of the research topic. I then developed keywords, while considering appropriate databases such as PsycINFO, PEP-Web, Academic Search Complete, ScienceDirect, EBSCO Cinahl, and Scopus among others. I started broad, then refined the search outcome by utilizing search operators, such as “AND” “OR” and “NOT.” Limiters such as age, gender, methodology, and timeframe helped in narrowing down to only relevant articles. I also investigated the citations to ensure that the information was valid and reliable. My literature review was based on the following research topic: “The impact of social anxiety among the adolescent population.”
A Doctor of Nurse Practice (DNP) and a Doctor of Philosophy in nursing (PhD) have similarities in that they are both research focused. However, having a PhD in nursing means that the research that is done is research that is original. Meaning, the PhD of nursing is finding groundbreaking research that will create new processes in healthcare. PhD grads are “prepared for careers as nurse scholars to conduct research that advances the discipline of nursing, health, and health care quality” (Johns Hopkins University, 2022). DNP grads are prepared “to become expert clinicians by applying research and knowledge to create more efficient practices and better patient outcomes” (Thomas, 2018). The DNP program involves research, but the difference is that the DNP uses the research and evidence-based processes created by the PhD. The DNP is focused on “quality improvement” and improved patient outcomes.
Article Reviews
The first article by Field, (2020) is a narrative review based on a literature search on PubMed and PsychINFO, to assess the impact of social anxiety on adolescents. The study utilized 53 papers, published from the year 2018 to 2020. The research also focused on the prevalence, risk factors, comorbidities, and interventions for social anxiety among adolescents. Based on the study outcome, it was discovered that the prevalence of social anxiety among adolescents ranged from 2% to 25%. The impacts of social anxiety on adolescents, as reported by the researcher include depression, poor academic performance, internet addiction, gaming, and emotion regulation problems.
For the second study, Chiu, Clark, & Leigh, (2021) carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis aimed at examining peer functioning and social anxiety among adolescents. Relevant articles were drawn from PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. It was discovered that peer rejection, poor friendship quality, and peer victimization were all associated with late social anxiety.
The last study conducted by Seema, & Kumar, (2017) was aimed at determining the relationship and gender differences between social anxiety and self-esteem among adolescents. A sample size of 200 adolescent students between the age of 16 to 18 years from several colleges in Bangalore city was utilized for the study. Social Phobia inventory and Rosenberg Self-esteem scale were used to collect data, which was statistically analyzed through SPSS. The results indicate a negative relationship between self-esteem and social anxiety among adolescents. The negative impacts of social anxiety were more pronounced among female adolescents as compared to the males.
Synthesis of the Articles
All three articles reported a negative impact of social anxiety on the social and personal lives of adolescents. While Field, (2020) and Chiu, Clark, & Leigh, (2021) utilized systemic literature review to conduct their studies, Seema, & Kumar, (2017) carried out a field study, with first-hand data from 200 participants. The study by Seema, & Kumar, (2017) also examined the relationship between gender difference and social anxiety, which revealed that female adolescents were affected more than males.
Differences between Summarizing and Synthesizing Research
Synthesizing research can be considered as the process of making a summary that links all the reviewed articles (Xiao, & Watson, 2019). Rather than just restating the significant points displayed in the individual articles, a research synthesis, involves the combination of ideas, which allows an evolved understanding of the content.
References
Field, T. (2020). Social Anxiety in Adolescents: A Narrative Review. J Anxiety Depress, 3(2), 127. https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-3264.127
Chiu, K., Clark, D. M., & Leigh, E. (2021). Prospective associations between peer functioning and social anxiety in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 279, 650-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.055
Seema, G. B., & Kumar, G. V. (2017). Self-esteem and social anxiety in adolescent students. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 12(2), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2017%2Fv8i3%2F162018
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Developing the proficiency to locate, read, and evaluate research articles is essential to your success in this doctoral program and your career. With this Assignment, you have the opportunity to become familiar with the Walden Library by searching the databases, reviewing resources, and downloading full-text articles. You are asked to think critically as you do this, keeping in mind that as a doctoral candidate you must be able to enhance your profession’s body of knowledge by synthesizing what you have learned into new insights and applying them in meaningful ways within the practice environment (as a DNP-prepared nurse) or engaging in original research (as a PhD-prepared nurse).
To get ready:
Participate in or watch an archived version of the Walden Library Webinars listed below:
Evaluating Online Resources Introduction to the Walden Library
An Overview of Evidence-Based Searching
Then, look through the Walden Library for two peer-reviewed primary research publications that are relevant to your practice area and of particular interest to you.
NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
By Day 7
To finish:
Create a four-paragraph APA-formatted paper that addresses the following:
Write a one-paragraph summary of each of the articles you’ve chosen (a total of 2 paragraphs).
Write one paragraph in which you synthesize the two pieces in an academic tone.
Write a final paragraph in which you compare and contrast summarizing and synthesizing research.
Due by Week 4’s Day 7.
NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Also Read:
NURS 8000 Assignment 1 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
NURS 8000 Week 6 Major Assignment: Membership in Professional Organizations
NURS 8000 AACN Competencies and the Walden Mission, Vision, and Outcomes
NURS 8000 Discussion 1 Week 2: Learning Online
NURS 8000 WEEK 2 Discussion 2: AACN Competencies and the Walden Mission, Vision, and Outcomes
NURS 8000 Discussion 1: Learning Online Week 2
Grading Criteria
NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4
To submit your Assignment:
Read Also: NURS 8000 Week 3 Discussion: Intra- and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Practice
Week 4 Assignment
Scholarship is a defining characteristic of both the DNP and the PhD. The ability to read, interpret, synthesize, and apply research to
improve patient care is at the heart and soul of the DNP, a practice doctorate. DNP-prepared nurses are expected to engage in evidence-based practices and collaborate with colleagues who conduct cutting-edge research. Likewise, PhD-prepared nurses must be well versed in the literature and engage in critical thinking as they evaluate others’ research and conduct their own.
This week, you explore the various resources provided by Walden University to assist you in becoming a critical and scholarly reader, thinker, and writer. Among the tools for your use are the extensive Walden Library holdings. You receive guidance on accessing and searching academic journals to locate peer-reviewed primary research articles. You also explore strategies for appraising research. In addition, you are introduced to Walden University’s Institutional Review Board, which helps to ensure that students adhere to established ethical and legal guidelines when conducting research.
NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Utilize Walden Library databases and resources to access, search, and download peer-reviewed primary research articles
- Distinguish between summarizing a research article and synthesizing the research
Learning Resources
Required Readings
- Introduction to the Walden Library
- Evaluating Online Resources
- An Introduction to Evidence-Based Searching
Document: Stages in Critical Reading of Research Articles (PDF)
Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Plagiarism and Academic Integrity (PDF)
Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success (PDF)
Document: Common APA Style and Formatting Challenges (PDF)
This document can be used as a quick reference guide for proper APA style and formatting.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012b). Introduction to scholarly writing: Finding a scholarly voice[Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 4 minutes.
This media program discusses the importance of writing with a scholarly voice, distinguishing between a voice that is effective and one that is not, and identifying what is needed to develop your own scholarly voice.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012c). Introduction to scholarly writing: Plagiarism and academic integrity [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 5 minutes.
NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Scholarly writing requires ethical practice in every phase and form of the process, from the drafting of a course paper to the completion of a capstone project. Academic integrity is foundational to all teaching and learning at Walden University. As a Walden student, you are required to follow the guidelines of academic integrity as set forth in the Walden Catalog. This media program helps you to do so.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012d). Introduction to scholarly writing: Purpose, audience, and evidence [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 5 minutes.
Key concepts related to scholarly writing are introduced in this media program.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012e). Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.
This media program presents tips for becoming a scholarly writer, including how to identify fears related to scholarly writing and connect with resources to improve writing skills.
Note: There is no Discussion this week.
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
One of the major activities that a DNP nurse participates in is research, usually evidence-based research. As indicated earlier, my interest is in researching reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). This condition is a clinical issue that needs to be mitigated to ensure that the patients have better health outcomes. This write-entails a summary and synthesis of two peer-reviewed articles obtained through the Walden Library search pertaining to reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Summary of The Articles
One of the articles with the title “Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial” reported by Fasugba et al. (2019) entails reducing CAUTI. The report compares the efficacy of the use of normal saline and 0.1% chlorhexidine solution in cleaning the meatal area prior to inserting urinary catheters in lowering the incidences of CAUTI. The study used a cross-sectional randomized control trial in the hospitals for a period of three weeks, with a total of 1642 research subjects recruited in three hospitals (Fasugba et al., 2019). While 58% of them were in the intervention period, the remaining 42% were in the control phase. Among the findings is that among the control group, 13 cases of CAUTI were recorded as compared to only 4 cases among the intervention group; hence the intervention was connected to a 94% reduction of the rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
More recently, a study has been reported by Nassikas et al. (2020) with the title “Intensive care unit rounding checklists to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections” This study purposed to determine whether the use of rounding checklist in an intensive care unit lowers the incidences of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These researchers used a retrospective before-and-after study design. Done in an academic community hospital with a 16 bed ICU unit, the intervention used was an ICU rounding checklist which ensured that the caregivers addressed the use of the indwelling catheters. Analysis was then done to compare the pre-intervention duration with the post-intervention after implementing the checklist. Pre and post-intervention strategy is one of the best ways of determining the efficacy of an intervention in the management of a condition or disease (Spurlock, 2018). Among the findings obtained from the research is that before the intervention, the unit recorded nineteen CAUTI cases per one thousand catheter days. The rate was found to reduce to 2.12 after the intervention from 4.62 before the implementation of the checklist.
Synthesis of The Sources
The findings of Fasugba et al. (2019) implies that by taking care of the meatal area through thorough cleaning, the rates of CAUTI incidences can greatly be reduced. By employing the normal intervention of using the 0.9% saline solution, whose efficacy has also been shown in previous studies (Khahakaew et al., 2019), this current research was able to demonstrate that the use of 0.1% chlorhexidine solution is more efficacious hence introducing better evidence to practice. Indeed, the findings are in agreement with other studies (Mitchell et al., 2019). However, the findings also differ from other reports where the use of chlorhexidine did not lead to lower incidences of CAUTI, even though that study was a single-site randomized control site.
Several interventions exist for controlling CAUTI. Patients at the ICU particularly need to be free from the infections to give them a better chance of healing; therefore, the study by Nassikas et al. (2020) is significant. They were able to demonstrate that using the checklist in the ICU setting can be vital. These findings can be generalizable in an ICU setting in other locations since the intervention focuses on just using a checklist. It is important to note that this intervention is relatively cost effective, even though at first it may lead to increased use of indwelling catheters, eventually it allows for lower usage rates. The findings are also supported by other studies. For instance, a study done to combine checklist and education intervention effectively reduced the rates of CAUTI (Menegueti et al., 2019).
References
Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Mitchell, B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19(6), 611-619. Doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30736-9.
Khahakaew, S., Suwanpimolkul, G., Wongkeskij, T., Punakabutra, N., & Suankratay, C. (2019, October). 1151. A Comparison of Periurethral Cleaning Between Normal Saline and Savlon Solutions Before Indwelling Urinary Catheterization in Reducing Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria: A Randomized Controlled Study. In Open Forum Infectious Diseases (Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2, pp. S411-S411). US: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1015
Menegueti, M. G., Ciol, M. A., Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F., Auxiliadora-Martins, M., Gaspar, G. G., da Silva Canini, S. R. M., … & Laus, A. M. (2019). Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: a quasi-experimental study. Medicine, 98(8). Doi 10.1097/MD.0000000000014417.
Mitchell, B. G., Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Graves, N. (2019). Chlorhexidine versus saline in reducing the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis. International journal of nursing studies, 97, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.003.
Nassikas, N. J., Monteiro, J. F. G., Pashnik, B., Lynch, J., Carino, G., & Levinson, A. T. (2020). Intensive Care Unit Rounding Checklists to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 41(6), 680-683. Doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.43
Spurlock Jr, D. R. (2018). The single-group, pre-and posttest design in nursing education research: It’s time to move on. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(2), 69-71. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180123-02.
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
Students pursuing advanced nursing education require and should develop research skills so that they can locate and critically analyze articles to attain evidence for implementation in their practice settings. Through this approach, they attain not just success in nursing research but also advance in their careers as well-informed practitioners who leverage evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to offer patient-centered care and reduce hospital readmission (Charosaei et al., 2021). The Walden University library offers resources and databases for advanced nursing students to conduct research and locate scholarly articles. Imperatively, through these databases which include PubMed Central, Medline, and CINAHL as well as BMC Central, one can locate articles on the topic of interest using keywords or terms. The purpose of this paper is to locate and analyze three articles from online resources provided by the identified databases or journals, summarize, and synthesize them from a scholarly perspective. In its final part, the paper explores the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.
Article 1
The first article is by Bokhour et al. (2018) and focuses on strategies that healthcare organizations can implement to offer patient-centered care. According to the authors, a core part of implementing patient-centered care (PCC) is transforming the organization’s culture of care. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with employees to identify various factors that help entities to offer patient-centered care like effective leadership, patient and family engagement, engaging the staff, and focusing on innovation among other aspects. In their conclusion, the authors are categorical that an effective organizational culture is key to offering patient-centered care.
Article 2
The article by Hower et al. (2019) explores the organizational determinants from decision makers’ point-of-view on implementing patient-centered care. Using a qualitative approach across different health and social care organizations (HSCOs), the authors found that various aspects were important and determined the level of patient-centered care (PCC) that each facility can offer. Among these include effective communication among staff, addressing staff welfare to motivate them, and overcoming resource constraints, especially financial and human resource issues. The authors conclude by imploring HSCOs to tailor their interventions based on their situations to meet these needs.
Article 3
The third article by Rammohan et al. (2023) discusses the implementation of care transition teams to reduce hospital readmission and enhance patient outcomes. Using a two-phase study approach to investigate readmission rates and associated risk factors in a community hospital for about five years, and a care transition team after discharge and patient support to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOHs). As such, the authors emphasize the critical role that care transition teams play in lowering the rates of hospital readmissions rates and mitigating the financial strain on healthcare organizations. The researchers assert that hospitals through care transition teams can lower the overall readmission rates by identifying and addressing individual risk factors that include evaluation of social determinants of health (SDOHs).
Synthesis of the Articles
The three articles emphasize the need for healthcare organizations to develop and implement effective strategies aimed at providing patient-centered care that can reduce hospital readmissions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020), patient-tailored interventions lead to increased participation of patients in their care plans and management of their condition. Tailoring these interventions ensures that patients get quality care based on care transition teams to reduce possible readmissions. Through these articles, one can identify the relationship between patient-centered care and reduced rates of readmissions, especially within the first thirty days after discharge. The articles are categorical that providing patient-centered care leads to improved care quality and reduces the possibility of readmissions.
Differences Between Summary and Synthesis of Articles
Article summary and synthesis are different based on the goals and focus. At the core of the article’s summary is detailing the topic of the study, methods, and approaches used, the results of the research, and the conclusion. The summary also outlines the main themes of the article. Conversely, synthesizing an article means identifying and critically analyzing the themes and areas of study covered by the authors. Article synthesis entails giving a more in-depth interpretation of the sources and their relevance to the practice issue being researched.
Conclusion
Locating and critically analyzing research articles is a core part of nurturing advanced nursing students’ research skills and attributes. Through this approach, nursing students enhance their ability to attain research evidence and implement it in practice settings to solve patient issues. The implication is that critical analysis entails synthesizing the articles to determine the common themes and their connection to the research goals and interests of the research.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020). Rethinking the Role of Primary
Care in Reducing Hospital Readmissions. https://www.ahrq.gov/news/blog/ahrqviews/rethinking-role-of-primary-care.html
Bokhour, B. G., Fix, G. M., Mueller, N. M., Barker, A. M., Lavela, S. L., Hill, J. N., … & Lukas,
- V. (2018). How can healthcare organizations implement patient-centered care? Examining a large-scale cultural transformation. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2949-5
Charosaei, F., Rostami, S., Esmaeili, M., Molavynejad, S., & Vanaki, Z. (2021). Effective
strategies for implementing patient-centered care in cardiac care unit: An opportunity for change. Journal of education and health promotion, 10. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05428-2
Hower, K. I., Vennedey, V., Hillen, H. A., Kuntz, L., Stock, S., Pfaff, H., & Ansmann, L. (2019).
Implementation of patient-centered care: which organizational determinants matter from the decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organizations. BMJ open, 9(4), e027591. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027591
Rammohan R, Joy M, Magam S, et al. (May 15, 2023) The Path to Sustainable Healthcare:
Implementing Care Transition Teams to Mitigate Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes. Cureus, 15(5): e39022. DOI:10.7759/cureus.39022
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 8000 Week 4 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
As a student pursuing further education in the field of nursing, it is imperative to develop skills that promote proficiency in research, that is, being able to locate sites with scholarly articles, read and carry out a critical analysis and evaluation. This is what will promote success in the field of nursing research and advancement in career as a credible scientist who can actively participate in the generation of new knowledge and skills that promote safer and efficient nursing practices. The databases available with scholarly work on nursing include; CINAHL Plus and PubMed (Medline) (Hopia & Heikkilä, 2019). The purpose of this paper is to identify two articles from the online nursing resources, write a summary of each article, synthesize the articles from a scholarly standpoint and discuss the difference between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.
The first article reviewed was on evidence-based practice, focusing on the knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses (Li et al., 2019). This article focuses on the perception of the community nurses about the EBP projects and the barriers they face in carrying out such projects. The CNs have noted that the EBP projects have not been effective in their healthcare service delivery as they believe it is strongly associated with the advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and they find their it difficult to relate it to their own practice. Additionally, it points out to the barriers the CNs face in successfully implementing their EBP projects. The barriers are majorly associated to limited time, resources, knowledge and training and poor motivation that does not encourage them to undertake such projects.
In my second article review, I read through the article on Evidence -based practice education for healthcare professionals: an expert review by Lehane et al., 2018.Accoording to the authors of the article, they do acknowledge the fact that even though EBP-projects are crucial to promoting patient’s safety and quality care, its implementation still remains a big challenge to most healthcare practitioners. There is need to constantly communicate to the evidences from research to the relevant stakeholders and more specifically healthcare educators which are better placed in articulating the EBP research process and importance. It is the role of nursing academicians and clinical educators to promote the expansion and successful implementation of EBP research findings into practice. This will ultimately result to quality care and updated methods of that are backed by research evidence and data (Lehane et al., 2018).
In the synthesis of the two articles, the focus is on evidence- based practice in nursing research. The first article critically analyses the EBP in relation to community nurses. Research article underscore the need to incorporate EBP among the community nurse practice as a means of promoting quality care and promote patient’s safety. However, there are barriers that the CNs face in a bid to effectively incorporate EBP findings in their practice. Over the years, there have been efforts to promote the full incorporation of EBP findings in nursing practice. In order to strengthen the nurse’s approach to EBP and bridge the gap between EBP results and practice, there are a three-pronged approach that is built on education, leadership and practice (Warren et al., 2016). These recommendations are in tandem with the second article that emphasizes on the importance of education in promoting successful implementation of EBP. Educational programs emphasizing on better ways nurses can ensure that they carry out proper EBP procedures, understand the rationale and are able to successfully implement it in practice (Worum et al., 2019).
Summarizing involves reading through the whole text and coming up with the main points from the article. This requires one to use their own words in creating the summary and it is meant to provide a general overview of the whole article. However, in synthesizing the article, one has to do a critical review of the article drawing comparisons and conclusions in relation to other articles and coming up with a comprehensive conclusion. These two aspects are important in nursing literature review to help the nursing student develop thorough understanding on the available literature sources on various nursing research conducted and how best they can be put into practice (Aveyard & Bradbury-Jones, 2019).
In conclusion, the process of locating and critically analyzing primary literature sources on nursing is essential in development of intellectual competency and promoting critical thinking in the advanced nursing studies. For a nurse who intends to continue with education and advance to doctorate level in nursing, it is imperative to develop such skills to make the future research work more manageable and productive as well. I do believe that the nursing students have a variety of credible databases that provide them with adequate resources to expand their scope of knowledge and spur further research that aims to improve quality of healthcare services offered.
References
Aveyard, H., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2019). An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0751-7
Hopia, H., & Heikkilä, J. (2019). Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review. Nursing Open, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.428
Lehane, E., Leahy-Warren, P., O’Riordan, C., Savage, E., Drennan, J., O’Tuathaigh, C., O’Connor, M., Corrigan, M., Burke, F., Hayes, M., Lynch, H., Sahm, L., Heffernan, E., O’Keeffe, E., Blake, C., Horgan, F., & Hegarty, J. (2018). Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert view. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 24(3), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111019
Li, S., Cao, M., & Zhu, X. (2019). Evidence-based practice. Medicine, 98(39), e17209. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017209
Warren, J. I., McLaughlin, M., Bardsley, J., Eich, J., Esche, C. A., Kropkowski, L., & Risch, S. (2016). The Strengths and Challenges of Implementing EBP in Healthcare Systems. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12149
Worum, H., Lillekroken, D., Ahlsen, B., Roaldsen, K. S., & Bergland, A. (2019). Bridging the gap between research-based knowledge and clinical practice: a qualitative examination of patients and physiotherapists’ views on the Otago exercise Programme. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1309-6