Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Walden University Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
The introduction for the Walden University Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100 assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Sample Answer for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary
Health care policy can facilitate or impede the delivery of services. For the past several
weeks, you have been engaging in an authentic activity by critically analyzing a specific
health care policy and various aspects of the impact associated with its implementation.
A critical step in the policy process is communicating your findings with others. This
week, you will share information from your policy analysis and its implications.
To prepare:
Briefly summarize your policy analysis, focusing on the implications for clinical practice
that may be most relevant or interesting for your colleagues. Include how evidence-
based practice influenced the policy, policy options, or solutions.
By Day 3
Post a 1- to 2-paragraph succinct summary of your policy analysis paper. Include at
least two of the options or solutions for addressing the policy and the resulting
implications for nursing practice and health care consumers.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 5
Respond to at least two of your colleagues sharing insights or contrasting perspectives
based on readings and evidence, and the practice implications of the policy.
Note: Please see the Syllabus and Discussion Rubric for formal Discussion question
posting and response evaluation criteria.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting.
Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments
made by your colleagues.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning
Resources and any additional sources.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
Week 11 Discussion 1 Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 5
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 11 Discussion 1
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Also Read:
NURS 8100 Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary ANSWER
NURS 8100 DiscussionIndividual Right Versus The Collective Good
NURS 8100 Discussion Federalism’s Impact On Policy
NURS 8100 Discussion Policy And State Boards Of Nursing
NURS 8100 Discussion Technology And Cost Containment
NURS 8100 Discussion Agenda Setting
Discussion : Nursing And Health Policy In Other Nations NURS 8100
NURS 8100 Discussion 2: Advocating Through Policy
NURS 8100 Discussion: Individual Right Versus the Collective Good ANSWER
NURS 8100 Discussion: Selecting a Policy Analysis Framework
NURS 8100 Discussion: Unintended Consequences of Health Care Reform
NURS 8100 Assignment: Staying Current: Online Resources
NURS 8100 Week 1 Discussion The Doctoral Degree and Professional Nursing Practice
NURS 8100 Discussion Nursing and Health Policy in Other Nations
NURS 8100 Discussion Federalism’s Impact on Policy
NURS 8100 Discussion Individual Right Versus the Collective Good
NURS 8100 Discussion Technology and Cost Containment
NURS 8100 Discussion Selecting a Policy Analysis Framework
NURS 8100 Discussion Unintended Consequences of Health Care Reform
NURS 8100 Staying Current Online Resources
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the
Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Bodenheimer, T., & Grumbach, K. (2016). Understanding health policy: A clinical
approach (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical.
Chapter 17, “Conclusion: Tensions and Challenges”
This chapter concludes with final thoughts on the challenge of providing quality
health care and controlling health care costs. The solution is likely to be resolved
only by a collaborative approach, involving all health care stakeholders, and by
health professionals taking the lead.
Howard, J., Levy, F., Mareiniss, D. P., Craven, C. K., McCarthy, M., Epstein-Peterson,
Z. D., & et al. (2010). New legal protections for reporting patient errors under the Patient
Safety and Quality Improvement Act: A review of the medical literature and
analysis. Journal of Patient Safety, 6(3), 147-152.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The authors studied the dissemination of information on the Patient Safety and Quality
Improvement Act (PSQIA), a federal act that affords protection to those reporting
medical errors. They found medical literature to be inadequate in this regard, and as a
result, medical personnel were uninformed on their legal protections. This lack of
information has become a barrier to policy implementation.
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2003). Development of a framework for
knowledge translation: Understanding user context. Journal of Health Services
Research & Policy, 8(2), 94–99.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Lau, B., San Miguel, S., & Chow, J. (2010). Policy and clinical practice: Audit tools to
measure adherence. Renal Society of Australasia Journal, 6(1), 36–40.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The authors study the compliance to renal-care policies by health care professionals.
They conclude with the necessity for nurses to support evidence-based protocols as
well as to obtain continuing education on new protocols.
McCracken, A. (2010). Advocacy: It is time to be the change. Journal of Gerontological
Nursing, 36(3), 15-17.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The author proposes that nurses, as patient advocates, need to be more involved in the
making of health care policy instead of reacting to policies that are constantly changing.
The article provides a guide to help organize initial policy efforts.
Nannini, A., & Houde, S. C. (2010). Translating evidence from systematic reviews for
policy makers. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 36(6), 22–26.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The article cites geronotological nurses as examples of those who are able to translate
research into policy briefs that can be clearly understood by policy makers.
Geronotological nurses are in this unique position because of their clinical experience
and educational background.
Paterson, B. L., Duffet-Leger, L., & Cuttenden, K. (2009). Contextual factors influencing
the evolution of nurses' roles in a primary health care clinic. Public Health Nursing,
26(5), 421-429.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
This article provides details on a study conducted in a nurse-managed clinic related to
the changing roles of nurses. The authors found that nurses, in response to social,
political, and economic forces, became involved in advocacy for the clinic through
political action, government funding issues, and media relations roles.
Sistrom, M. (2010). Oregon's Senate bill 560: Practical policy lessons for nurse
advocates. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 11(1), 29-35. doi:
10.1177/1527154410370786
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The author uses the efforts by a nurse advocate in lobbying for an Oregon bill related to
healthy food in public schools to illustrate nurse advocacy and policy making. The bill,
developed in response to childhood obesity, did not immediately become law. The
author concludes with the importance of considering the political environment when
creating successful policy.
Spenceley, S. M., Reutter, L., & Allen, M. N. (2006). The road less traveled: Nursing
advocacy at the policy level. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 7(3), 180-194. doi:
10.1177/1527154410370786
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Nurses have always been advocates at the patient-level of care, but the authors of this
article promote the need for all nurses to become advocates at the policy level as well.
They discuss factors that have kept nurses from getting involved with policy making and
they provide strategies to resolve these challenges.
Wyatt, E. (2009). Health policy advocacy: Oncology nurses make a difference. ONS
Connect, 24(10), 12-15.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The author presents information on two nurses who have become health care policy
advocates—one as a policy maker and one as an elected legislator. Both have been
able to use their perspectives from their nursing careers to affect health policy.
Zomorodi, M., & Foley, B. J. (2009). The nature of advocacy vs. paternalism in nursing:
Clarifying the ‘thin line.’ Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(8), 1746-1752.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
The authors attempt to distinguish the concepts of advocating for a patient and
paternalism, or overriding a patient’s wishes. They provide clinical examples to illustrate
the differences between these concepts, and they conclude with strategies to use in
practice.
Required Media
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2011). Healthcare policy and advocacy:
Advocating through policy. Baltimore: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 7 minutes.
In this media presentation, Dr. Joan Stanley and Dr. Kathleen White discuss how
nurses can influence practice and engage in advocacy through the policy process.
Accessible player
Optional Resources
Birnbaum, D. (2009). North American perspectives: POA, HAC and never
events. Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 14(3), 242–244.
Sample Answer 2 for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
The selected policy is HB3871 Safe Patient Limits Act, which is currently pending action in the Illinois Legislature. The proposed policy sets a minimum nurse staffing requirement for all hospitals in Illinois. It states the maximum number of patients assigned to a registered nurse in specific situations. It also provides that nothing shall bar a healthcare facility from assigning fewer patients to a registered nurse than the limits stated in Act (Illinois General Assembly, n.d.). Besides, it provides that nothing in the Act stops the use of patient acuity systems consistent with the Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Act. Nonetheless, the maximum patient assignments in the Act may not be exceeded, despite using and applying any patient acuity system.
The policy can be addressed by having each hospital’s clinical team make staffing decisions for their hospitals depending on the unique circumstances at the specific hospital at any given time (Han et al., 2021). The policy can also be addressed by having professional nursing organizations advocate the implementation of the mandated staffing ratios in all hospitals to promote better working conditions for nurses and improve patient safety and quality of care. Implementing the policy can reduce nurse burnout and low job satisfaction associated with high workloads and physical and emotional fatigue (Lasater et al., 2021). In addition, it can improve the safety of patient care and patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
References
Han, X., Pittman, P., & Barnow, B. (2021). Alternative Approaches to Ensuring Adequate Nurse Staffing: The Effect of State Legislation on Hospital Nurse Staffing. Medical care, 59(10 Suppl 5), S463. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001614
Illinois General Assembly. (n.d.). Bill status for HB2604. https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocTypeID=HB&DocNum=2604&GAID=15&SessionID=108&LegID=118738
Lasater, K. B., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D., French, R., Martin, B., Alexander, M., & McHugh, M. D. (2021). Patient outcomes and cost savings associated with hospital safe nurse staffing legislation: an observational study. BMJ open, 11(12), e052899. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052899
Sample Answer 3 for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
The nursing profession is the largest segment of the nation’s health care workforce. Several barriers prevent nurses from responding effectively to rapidly changing healthcare settings and an evolving healthcare system. Although more than a quarter-million nurses are advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), who have master’s or doctoral degrees and pass national certification exams, they are limited in their exercise to practice. Regulations regarding the scope of practice vary and effects different types of nurses from state to state. Most states do not have rules that allow nurse practitioners to see patients and prescribe medications without a physician’s supervision (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2019). States that restrict APRNs’ ability to practice according to their licensure authority are associated with geographic health care disparities, higher chronic disease burden, primary care shortages, higher costs of care, and lower standing on national health rankings (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2013).
A major influence that full practice authority is the decrease in the unnecessary repetition of orders, office visits, and care services. Greater use of NPs projects over $16 billion in immediate savings would increase over time (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2013). Overall, the recommendations are geared toward advancing the nursing profession and are focused on actions required to meet best long-term future needs rather than needs in the short term.
Reference
American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2013). Nurse practitioner cost effectiveness. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements/nurse-practitioner-cost-effectiveness
American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2019). Scope of practice for Nurse Practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements/scope-of-practice-for-nurse-practitioners
Sample Answer 4 for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
The policy I addressed was the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2019. This policy/bill expands and empowers nursing workforce development programs through FY2024 (Congress, n.d.). This bill builds on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2010) report that recommends nurses should achieve higher levels of education and training through an improved education system that promotes seamless academic progress. This policy/bill was first passed in 2017 and has required significant nursing leadership advocation. I utilized a framework by Fawcette and Russell (2001) to look at social, ethical, legal, and financial impacts of the policy.
Numerous options/solutions for addressing the policy were addressed including no change, partial change, and a radical change. A partial solution to the barrier of nursing education funding would be the proposal of the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act. This could encourage the standardization of nursing programs and create one uniform degree requirement for entry level nursing. Nurses could also access clear instructions on how to advance their degree with various clinical pathways outlined. This solution requires nursing leaders to be a strong advocate both in policy reform and nursing organizations to fill the gap until a more radical solution could be proposed. This can positively impact the nursing practice as it increases nurse education dollars and could improve staff to patient radios for improved patient outcomes. A radical change to address the nursing education pipeline would be providing free four-year education at a public university. This would take significant funding from taxpayers and bipartisan support. This radical solution would require nursing leaders to be highly involved in nursing legislature to ensure the solution was implemented. The cost of this radical option could be exorbitant and would require significant dedication, consensus, and support to obtain. The impact to the nursing profession as a result of this solution is unknown but one can posit that it would increase the number of healthcare professionals entering the field, improve staffing ratios and ultimately positively impact patient and organizational outcomes.
References
Congress. (n.d.). H.R. 728 Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/728
Fawcette, J., & Russell, G. (2001). A conceptual model of nursing and health policy. Policy, Politics, & Nursing, 2(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440100200205
Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health.
Sample Answer 5 for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Gun violence is an urgent, complex, and multifaceted problem. According to new data issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), gun deaths are reaching epidemic levels in 2019. This intolerable tendency has continued for years, and it is past time for it to end. The stakes are at an all-time high. In total, 39,707 Americans were killed by firearms in 2019. This corresponds to almost 3,300-gun deaths every month, over 763 per week, and nearly 109 per day. Rates of firearm suicide and homicide continue to grow year after year. Each act of gun violence wreaks havoc on families and communities, leaving survivors to deal with sorrow, loss, and trauma (Nguyen, 2021).
Numerous gun-control strategies have been linked to lower gun-related morbidity and mortality rates. For example, requiring prospective gun purchasers to obtain a license, allowing for the temporary removal of guns from people who are in danger of killing themselves or others, and regulating safe storage have all been related to decreased rates of homicide, suicide, and unintentional gun deaths (Crifasi et al., 2021). Gun-control law is decided at the federal level, but healthcare providers can help minimize gun violence at the local level as well. Health professionals can help with research, questionnaires, and listening sessions to gather data for working papers that will eventually serve as background material for future legislation. These experts can campaign for gun safety on a local level by collaborating with local legislators, political action groups, and other lobbying initiatives aimed at swaying public opinion. The people may not have the ability to directly participate in the development of gun-control legislation, but their votes have a large influence on legislators (Healthcare Management, 2022). As the most noble profession, nurses have a collective obligation to reduce gun violence. Parents and caregivers seek advice from nurses. Nurses must utilize their influence and relationships with families to highlight gun violence and safety. Nurses are at the forefront of health promotion for a variety of medical illnesses and are therefore in an ideal position to incorporate screenings for gun violence and safety into routine workflows (Muir, 2021).
References
Crifasi, C. K., Ward, J. A., McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., & Barry, C. L. (2021). Public opinion on gun
policy by race and gun ownership status. Preventive Medicine, 149, N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106607
Healthcare Management (2022). How Can Healthcare Professionals Help with Gun Violence? Retrieved
Nguyen, A. (2021). New CDC Data Underscores Urgency of America’s Gun Violence Crisis. Retrieved from
https://giffords.org/blog/2021/01/new-cdc-data-underscores-urgency-of-americas-gun violence-crisis/
Muir, M.S.P. (2021). Gun violence: A chronic disease affecting American youth. Pediatric Nursing, 47(4),
200-201.
Sample Answer 6 for Discussion 1: Policy Analysis Summary NURS 8100
Summary of Policy Analysis Paper
The policy that was chosen for the policy analysis paper was the mental health policy of the Lorna Breen Provider Protection Act. This act was launched after a health care provider Lorna Breen completed suicide. There has been an increase in mental instability cases among health care workers and providers throughout America. Due to this increase this has posed a serious threat and policies around the healthcare sector have been implemented to make sure that health care workers’ mental health is heavily guarded. Lawmakers are seeking a lasting solution that will solve mental health problems and challenges within the United States (Chan, Sahimi & Binti, 2022).
Options or Solutions Addressing the Policy
Hopefully by implementing this policy mental health will be addressed and become a priority for caring for the wellbeing of health care workers. The United States will start issuing grants to assist in training healthcare workers, students, and professionals on strategies to help decrease burnout, prevent suicide, lessen substance abuse disorder, and be more aware of the different types of mental health conditions. Other grants will be distributed among medical professional associations to help expand evidence-based programs to encourage mental and behavioral health employees (Chisholm et al., 2019).
These implications are greatly needed for health care workers are very important especially due to the increase added stress from the current pandemic. Mental health issues are very real. Hopefully this policy will help decrease the stigma of health care workers having to be strong and afraid to show their weaknesses of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideations.
References
Chan, L. F., Salleh Sahimi, H. M., & Raudhah binti Mokhzani, A. (2022). A global call for action to
prioritize healthcare worker suicide prevention during the CoViD-19 pandemic and beyond. Crisis. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000852
Chisholm, D., Docrat, S., Abdulmalik, J., Alem, A., Gureje, O., Gurung, D., … & Lund, C. (2019).
Mental health financing challenges, opportunities and strategies in low-and middle-income counties: Findings from Emerald project. BJPsych Open, 5(5). Https//doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.24