NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Walden University NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University   NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief) depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

The introduction for the Walden University   NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief) is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief) 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief) assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief) assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Sample Answer for NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Nurses engaged in the policy arena often are asked to provide information on a health care topic of interest to policy makers. This is frequently accomplished through developing a policy brief. A policy brief advocates for a particular recommendation (prior to the enactment of a policy). Learning how to write a policy brief in a clear, succinct, scholarly, and professional manner is an essential skill for advanced practice nurses.

For this Assignment, you will assess one of the recommendations from the Institute of Medicine’s The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations. You will then develop a policy brief to advocate for this recommendation (the written policy brief is due in Week 7).

I love your “distraction” strategy and the “Do Not Disturb” sign! I believe that is a wonderful strategy. Thank you for sharing.

I always found that visualizing my was goals helpful, especially when I became discouraged. When I was doing my doctoral studies I would make a simple pie graph and fill it in as I completed my assignments and written work. It really helped me to see how much closer I was to finishing my studies and kept me on track.

I do not know how anyone can be successful in this program without being able to manage their time and having at least fundamental ability to create a Excel spreadsheet, etc..  I think one strategy that has empowered me is the ability to use and understand technology.  During my doctoral studies, I learned how technology can improve and challenge one at the same time.

A strategy that I feel is one of the most important is that of effective communication, also. Reading writings a loud prior to posting, is something I utilized even when no one was listening to me. When I could snag someone to hearing me reading aloud, I would read some paragraphs aloud and then try to summarize what I had read aloud, as though I was teaching the content. I found this useful. Perhaps it would work for some of you, too.

References

Laureate Education (Producer). (2012a). Effective online communication: Scholarly writing in online discussion [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

Laureate Education (Producer). (2012f). Tips for effective online composition and communication [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

A policy brief is a vital tool used to present research findings and recommendations to an audience with no specialization in the policy matter. Policy briefs offer evidence-based policy recommendations to help legislators make informed decisions (Arnautu & Dagenais, 2021). A strong policy brief incorporates research findings supporting the recommended policy and draws clear connections to policy initiatives. Therefore, it should be clear and concise to ensure the target audience adequately understands the recommendations. This paper presents a policy brief on the recommendation from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report.

Selected Recommendation

The selected IOM recommendation is: “Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training.”

Background

The IOM recommendation emphasizes the need to transform nursing practice. The report encourages lawmakers to be guided by the Nursing Practice Act and Administrative Rules to amend state nurses’ scope-of-practice laws. Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) are highly trained and competent to provide a wide range of healthcare services. However, they are limited by barriers, such as federal policies, state laws, obsolete insurance reimbursement models, and organizational practices and culture (Sullivan, 2018). State and federal initiatives are needed to update and standardize APRNs’ scope-of-practice regulations to capitalize on their specialized education and full capacity. Furthermore, the IOM report states that APRNs need to be allowed to practice to the full scope of practice. This will ensure that all citizens can access essential healthcare services and that organizations make the best use of the APRNs’ unique contributions to the healthcare team.

Insurance providers and States should create specific policy, regulatory, and financial changes that offer patients the freedom to choose from a range of health providers, including APRNs, to best, meet their healthcare needs (Sullivan, 2018). Eradicating regulatory, policy, and financial barriers to increase patient choices and patient-centered care is critical in creating a reformed health care system.

Current Characteristics

The scope of APRN practice varies with the state. The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) defines three types of practice authority for APRNs: Full, Reduced, and Restricted practice. APRNs practicing in states with Full practice authority are authorized to practice to their full scope of training, including evaluating, diagnosing, ordering and interpreting diagnostic tests, and prescribing treatments (AANP, n.d.). The state board of nursing gives them exclusive authority to practice to their full scope. Currently, 24 states in the U.S and its territories have adopted Full practice licensure laws. NPs practicing in states with a reduced practice are allowed to participate in at least one element of the NP practice. However, they are regulated by a collaborative agreement with a physician (AANP, n.d.). Physician oversight is needed for the NP to prescribe treatment. Sixteen states currently have the reduced practice.

There are 11 states with a restricted practice whereby the state board of nursing mandates APRN supervision or delegation of duties such as diagnosing and prescribing by a physician. Texas lies at the lower end of the spectrum with regards to the freedom it offers APRNs. One of the barriers to expanding APRNs’ scope of practice has been opposed by some physicians and physician organizations. Some physicians argue that APRNs are less competent to provide the services outlined in their scope of practice since they do not undergo rigorous training like physicians (Sofer, 2018).

The Impact of the Recommendation

Patients perceive that the recommendation on the full scope for APRNs will increase their access to essential health services, especially in rural areas where there are few physicians and APRNs are usually the primary care providers. Currently, the country faces a shortage of primary care physicians, especially in rural and underserved areas (Ortiz et al., 2018). However, there is also an ample supply of specialists, which increase health care expenditures since specialist charge more expensively than primary care physicians. In addition, healthcare consumers perceive that the recommendation will lower the cost of healthcare. This is because full practice authority lowers duplication of services and billing costs caused by the outdated physician oversight (Ortiz et al., 2018). Besides, full practice decreases the unnecessary office visits, repetition of orders, and treatment services.

Nurses and professional nursing organizations argue that if all states allowed APRNs to practice to the full scope of their education and training, it could increase the workforce needed to meet the country’s primary care needs. APRNs would also contribute their specialized knowledge and skills to delivering person-centered, community-based health care (DePriest et al., 2020). Physicians believe that granting APRNs full practice will reduce their workload and increase access to care for patients living in underserved urban and rural areas. This is because states with full practice authority have many NPs working in the rural and underserved areas, which increases access to healthcare. Nevertheless, some physicians perceive that the recommendation will negatively impact patient care due to the lack of rigorous medical training for APRNs (Sofer, 2018). Various organizations, such as the Kaiser Family Foundation, argue that APRNs could help meet the demand for primary care. They argue that APRNs’ full practice can help meet the demand for primary health care, which is increasing due to a growing aging population (DePriest et al., 2020). Besides, increased access to health care through the Affordable Care Act increases the population in demand for care, and APRNs can help bridge the gap.

Current Solutions

The current solution to having nurses to their full extent is advocacy. Many professional organizations are lobbying to remove barriers that limit APRNs from working to the full extent of their education and training (Peterson, 2018). NP organizations in various states have engaged lobbyists to help bring the advocacy efforts to the front line of policymakers. The lobbyists are educating policymakers on what APRN full practice entails. They clarify that it is not a policy against physicians but rather one that seeks to provide patients with access to quality care (Peterson, 2018). The Campaign by the Future of Nursing is one approach taken to lobby for APRNs to practice to their full scope in states with reduced and restricted practice. Furthermore, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) monitors the practice roles and bills related to APRN practice to keep APRNs informed of their lobbying efforts.

Current Status in the Health Policy Arena

A report from The Campaign shows that APRN practice authority has expanded significantly since the release of the IOM recommendation report. After the release of the IOM report, 44 state Action Coalitions worked on the recommendation to get rid of barriers in the APRN scope of practice. Besides, 13 states have passed laws granting APRNs full practice authority (Sullivan, 2018). Since the Campaign’s commencement, eight states amended their laws to grant APRNs full practice and prescriptive authority. Furthermore, some states with reduced and restrictive practices have improved their laws to be less restrictive (Sullivan, 2018). For instance, Florida (reduced practice) passed a bill that requires PMHNPs to practice for the first two years with supervision and then practice to the full scope of their licensure.

Conclusion

The IOM recommendation on allowing APRNs to practice to the full scope of their education and training will increase accessibility to healthcare and lower costs. The health care environment is continuously evolving with an increasing demand for healthcare services from the aging population. Thus APRNs’ full contribution to the health care team is essential. Tremendous progress has been made toward decreasing restrictions on the APRN scope of practice across the U.S. States. The states with restrictive and reduced APRN practice are increasing APRNs’ potential to contribute fully to health care. However, more efforts are needed to hasten the amendments of the obsolete policies. We need more states to grant full practice authority to APRNs as primary care providers.

References

AANP. (n.d.). Issues at a glance: Full practice authority. American Association of Nurse Practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/policy-briefs/issues-full-practice-brief

Arnautu, D., & Dagenais, C. (2021). Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00885-9

DePriest, K., D’Aoust, R., Samuel, L., Commodore-Mensah, Y., Hanson, G., & Slade, E. P. (2020). Nurse practitioners’ workforce outcomes under the implementation of full practice authority. Nursing Outlook, 68(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.05.008

Ortiz, J., Hofler, R., Bushy, A., Lin, Y. L., Khanijahani, A., & Bitney, A. (2018). Impact of nurse practitioner practice regulations on rural population health outcomes. In Healthcare (Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 65). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6020065

Peterson, M. E. (2018). Barriers to Practice and the Impact on Health Care: A Nurse Practitioner Focus. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 8(1), 74–81.

Sofer, D. (2018). AMA Resolution Opposes Independent Practice by APRNs. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 118(3), 12. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000530922.33715.46

Sullivan, T. (2018). Institute of Medicine Report, The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Policy and Medicine.

Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Advanced practice nurses play a critical role in the provision of care that meets the healthcare needs of the diverse populations they serve. Since the recognition of the roles they play, advanced practice nurses have increased access to care in the modern America where there has been a significant shift in population profile. Over the past few years, significant transformations have been witnessed in the US healthcare system. They include increased coverage of patients under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and rise in the baby boomers’ population. The impact of these changes is that the US is expected to experience an acute shortage of healthcare workers to meet the changing population dynamics. Advanced practice nurses could act as a solution to this problem. However, their scope of practice remains limited in most of the states in the US (Altman et al., 2016). Therefore, there is an increased need for the policy makers, states, and government agencies to consider eliminating barriers to full scope of practice for advanced practice nurses as a way of addressing the anticipated challenges affecting the healthcare system.

The Selected Recommendation

The selected recommendation for the policy brief from the IOM report is removing scope of practice barriers for advanced practice nurses. According to the report, advanced practice nurses should have the autonomy to practice fully according to the level of their training and education (Feller, 2018). The barriers to full practice among them can be eliminated with the adoption of various interventions by the Congress, state legislature, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Personnel Management, and the Federal Trade Commission. Some of the recommended interventions in the report include the need for the amendment of the requirements for the participation of advanced practice nurses in the Medicare program and the need for insurance to cover the services provided by the advanced practice nurses. It also includes the need for a review of the existing as well as proposed state regulations guiding the professional practice of advanced practice nurses (Institute of Medicine, 2011). Through these interventions, the authors of the report are optimistic that the scope of practice for advanced practice nurses will be expanded in accordance with their training and education.

Background

The role of advanced practice nurses in health dates back to the 1890s when Lilian Wald developed the Henry Street Settlement where visiting nurses provided care to the poverty-stricken immigrants in the state. In 1925, Mary Brechneridge, a certified nurse midwife, established decentralized clinics in Kentucky with the aim of preventing maternal and infant mortalities due to shortage of physicians in the region. However, it was until the 1960s when nurse practitioner’s role was recognized in the US healthcare. Nurse practitioners were seen as the most effective professionals that could provide care meeting the needs of the underserved rural populations in America. In the modern century, the professional roles and scope of practice for advanced practice nurses has expanded significantly (Keeling, 2015). However, full practice is yet to be recognized in most states, thereby, preventing advanced practice nurse from delivering care that optimize the health outcomes of the diverse populations using the knowledge from their education and training.

Current Characteristics

According to Altman et al. (2016), the scope for advanced practice registered nurses in most states in America currently remains limited. This is despite them having been trained to provide different service to address the healthcare needs of the diverse populations in America. The limitations are attributed to factors such as state laws, outdated insurance reimbursement schemes, federal policies, and institutional culture and policies (Altman et al., 2016). The extent of the limitation in the scope for advanced practice nurses can be seen from the statistics that only 22 states alongside the District of Columbia in America have adopted full practice laws and authority licensure for nurse practitioners. Additionally, 17 states have been categorized as reduced practice state while 12 states have been categorized as restricted practice states (Peterson, 2017). Therefore, significant interventions need to be embraced for the scope of advanced practice nurses to be expanded in the state.

The Impact of Recommendation

The recommendation to remove barriers to the scope of advanced practice nurses will have significant impacts. Firstly, it will expand the nature of services provided by these nurses to the diverse populations in America. In specific, the underserved populations will benefit from increased access to and availability of the service they need. The removal of barriers will also expand the role and autonomy of advanced practice nurses in healthcare. It will challenge them to explore additional ways in which their role in healthcare can be improved. It will also strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration since they will have a greater role to play in the delivery of healthcare than it is currently (Woo et al., 2017). However, other groups of healthcare providers are skeptical with the action since it will diminish the role they play in healthcare. Despite this, most of the healthcare stakeholders are optimistic that the move will result in significant improvement in the US healthcare system (Bosse et al., 2017).

Current Solutions

Several interventions can be embraced to eliminate barriers to scope of advanced practice nurses. One of them is reforming the Medicare regulations that prevent advanced practice nurses from providing full care according to their training and education. The state laws should also be revised to provide full scope of practice for the advanced practice nurses. Institutional culture and policies should be transformed to accommodate the full scope for advanced practice nurses. Lastly, advanced practice nurses should advocate for the recognition of the system wide benefits associated with their full scope in the provision of their services (Brassard & Smolenski, 2011).

Status in Health Policy Arena

Policy interventions have been embraced to address the limitations in scope of advanced practice nurses. According to Altman et al. (2016), 44 state action coalitions have been adopted since the release of IOM report. This has led to eight more states being classified as full practice states and others improving their laws to expand the practice of these nurses. The ACA also passed laws that prohibit the discrimination of healthcare providers who act according to their scope of certification by the insurers. The CMS has also broadened its concept of medical staff to allow nurse practitioners to practice in accordance with the provisions of their scope. The Federal Trade Commission has advocated for the removal of barrier for advanced practice nurses through their persuasion of states with restricted or reduced practice. Therefore, with these policy changes, it is anticipated that the barriers to scope of advanced practice nurses will be eliminated in the near future in all states in America (Altman et al., 2016).

Conclusion

The role and need for advanced practice nurses in the modern and future America cannot be underscored. It is therefore important that barriers to their full scope of practice be addressed in all the states. The elimination of these barriers should be a collective responsibility of all the stakeholders involved in healthcare. Through it, optimum outcomes of care will be realized by the states.

References

Altman, S. H., Butler, A. S., Shern, L., & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Removing Barriers to Practice and Care. In Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing. National Academies Press (US).

Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is necessary to transform primary care. Nursing outlook, 65(6), 761-765.

Brassard, A., & Smolenski, M. C. (2011). Removing barriers to advanced practice registered nurse care: Hospital privileges. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.

Feller, F. (2018). Transforming nursing education: A call for a conceptual approach. Nursing education perspectives, 39(2), 105-106.

Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Keeling, A. W. (2015). Historical perspectives on an expanded role for nursing. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2).

Peterson, M. E. (2017). Barriers to Practice and the Impact on Health Care: A Nurse Practitioner Focus. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 8(1), 74.

Woo, B. F. Y., Lee, J. X. Y., & San Tam, W. W. (2017). The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Human resources for health, 15(1), 63.

To prepare:

Review the Lavis et al. article on preparing and writing policy briefs provided in the Learning Resources.
Select one of the recommendations within the IOM The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health: Report Recommendations to focus on for this assignment.
Research the history of the problem behind the recommendation and what has been done to try to solve the problem.
What does the recommendation say should be done? Are there any groups, nursing and others, currently supporting work to implement the recommendation (e.g., Kaiser Family Foundation, professional organizations)? Does the recommendation suggest specific groups that should be involved in the implementation? Think critically about how the recommendation should be implemented – did the IOM get it right? What other strategies are possible to consider?

By Day 7 of Week 7

To complete:

Develop a scholarly and professionally written 2- to 3-page single-spaced policy brief on the recommendation you selected from the IOM report following the format presented in the Lavis et al. article. Include the following:
Short introduction with statement of the problem.
The selected recommendation (from the IOM Report)
Background
Current characteristics
The impact of the recommendation from the perspective of consumers, nurses, other health professionals, and additional stakeholders
Current solutions
Current status in the health policy arena
Final conclusions
Resources used to create the policy brief

Due by Day 7 of Week 7. Complete instructions for submitting your Assignment are provided in the Week 7 Assignment area.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8100 Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Note: You will post a summary of your policy brief in the Week 7 Discussion.

Assignment 2: Health Policy Proposal Analysis (Policy Brief)

Program LOs: 4, 5

4: Professions/Collaborators

5: Effective Communicators

DNP Essentials: 5, 6

5: Healthcare Policy for Advocacy in Healthcare

6: Interprofessional collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes (Scroll down for table)

ASSIGNMENT PROMPT

Policy Brief Paper

Target

5 points

Acceptable

3 points

Unacceptable

1 point

Score/Level

Part 1:2- to 3-page single-spaced policy brief on the recommendation you selected from the IOM report following the format presented in the Lavis et al. article. Include the following:

Short introduction with statement of the problem.

The selected recommendation (from the IOM Report)

Background

Current characteristics

The impact of the recommendation from the perspective of consumers, nurses, other health professionals, and additional stakeholders

Current solutions

Current status in the health policy arena

Final conclusions

Resources used to create the policy brief

Program LO: 4, 5

DNP Essential: 5, 6 Exemplary quality.

Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses questions/issues discussed in the interview; Applies advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.

Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5.

Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6.Well-developed good quality work.

Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It fully meets expectations for graduate level work.

Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5.

Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6.Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.

Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Does not meet expectations for graduate level work.

Insufficient to meet expectations for graduate work for LOs 4, 5.

Insufficient Essentials 5, 6.

Part 2: References and APA requirements

Format applied as presented in the Lavis et al. article.

The majority of references are from scholarly journals, supports the topic well, and are current. Paper stays within page requirements.  APA format used correctly throughout. Application of the Lavis article.

Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.

Most references are from scholarly journals and support the topic. Most references are fairly current. The paper stays within requirements. APA format used with minimal errors.

Meets expectations for graduate level work.

References are not sufficient or are mostly from the lay literature or out of date. The paper is either too long or too short. Weak writing quality and/or little evidence of correctness of APA format.

Does not meet expectations for graduate work.

Assignment:

By Day 7 of Week 9

To complete:

Develop a scholarly and professionally written 2- to 3-page single-spaced policy brief on the recommendation you selected from the IOM report following the format presented in the Lavis et al. article. Include the following:

Phase 1 (5 points)

Short introduction with statement of the problem.
The selected recommendation (from the IOM Report)
Background
Current characteristics
The impact of the recommendation from the perspective of consumers, nurses, other health professionals, and additional stakeholders
Current solutions
Current status in the health policy arena

Phase 2 (5 points)

Levis article format applied
Resources used to create the policy brief

Total points = 10