NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
Walden University NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
According to Shorten & Smith (2017), mixed methods is a research approach whereby researchers collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data within the same study. Mixed methods research draws on potential strengths of both methods (Greene et al., 1989). My area of interest is heart failure (HF) because it is a life-limiting condition in the developed world with over 26 million people world wide (Ambrosy et al., 2014). I read an article that used the mixed method research approach on a group of caregivers for patients with CHF. The design of the study consisted of advanced heart failure patients (n = 112), and their caregivers (n = 84). The researchers used two phases, the first phase consisted of the patients and their caregivers, data was collected by use of questionnaires and used the quantitative method. Variables used in phase 1 consisted of the patient’s age, sex, educational level and whether their primary caregiver was a spouse or adult child. The 2nd phase used the qualitative method to do face-to-face interviews with current and bereaved caregivers. Correlation, chi-square, t test, regression and thematic analysis were undertaken (Mcllfatrick et al., 2017). Qualitative variables consisted the need to plan the future, emotional support and knowledge on what to expect at the end of life (Mcllfatrick et al., 2017).
Mixed-method studies are challenging because they often take twice the work and require expertise in multiple areas (Weaver, 2015). They can also be expensive and finding researchers experience in both qualitative & quantitative research.
References
Ambrosy, A.P., Fonarow, G.C., Butler, J. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. Journal Am Coll Cardiology 2014; 63: 1123-1133. https: journals-sagepub-com.ezp.waldenulibrary
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs. Education Evaluation Policy Anal, 1989; 11:255-274. doi: 10.3102/016237370110032
Mcllfatrick, S., Doherty, L.C., Murphy, M., Dixon, L., McDonald, K., & Fitzsimons, D. (2017). The importance of planning for the future: Burden and unmet needs of caregivers in advanced heart failure: A mixed methods study. Palliative Medicine, December 13, 2017. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/0269216317743958
Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base. Evidenced-Based Nursing, Volume 20, Issue 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699
Weaver, J. (2015). Challenges of Mixed-Method Research. Biocultural Systematics. (2015). https://anthropology.ua.edu/blog/biocultmed/2015/04/30/
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8200 Briefly explain your selected situation and why utilizing a mixed-methods approach would be beneficial
Outstanding posting and much-needed topic of focus for a research project. Heart Failure diagnosis is a staggering clinical as well as public health concern across America (Roger, 2013). Have you considered implementing longitudinal sequential explanatory mixed
methods to support your study on Heart Failure? The purpose of this type of study is to combine the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative research, linking concepts and views as well as comparing findings with data from different situations and times (Riegel et al., 2018). The mixed methodology is known as the cornerstone of research within social science taking concepts from experiences of everyday life (2018). The study of the epidemiology of Heart Failure is associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and health-care expenditures, particularly among those aged 65 and older (Roger, 2013). The burden of heart failure is not related to an increase in the incidence of the disease, it reflects the chronic clinical course of patients living with heart failure (2013). It is recommended by the literature, to improve outcomes for patients and prevent hospitalizations, an in-depth understanding of the causes of hospitalizations in patients living with heart failure is imperative (2013).
References
Riegel, B., Dickson V.V., Lee, C.S., Daus, M., Hill, J., Irani E, Lee, S., Wald, J.W., Moelter, S.T., Rathman, L., Streur, M., Baah, F.O., Ruppert, L., Schwartz, D.R., Bove, A. (2018). A mixed methods study of symptom perception in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Lung. 47(2):107-114. Retrieved From DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Jan 3. PMID: 29304990; PMCID: PMC5857218.
Roger V. L. (2013). Epidemiology of heart failure. Circulation research, 113(6), 646–659. Retrieved From https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300268
You are right. Mixed-method studies can be challenging. Mixed-method is characterized by conducting several means like data methods, standards, and sources in examining a similar phenomenon. In this process, triangulation allows the researcher to identify aspects of accurately approaching events by correctly approaching them from different angles using various methods and techniques. Thus, it provides both the strengths, which offset some weaknesses regarding quantitative and qualitative research. For instance, if qualitative research does not fully understand a particular context, the quantitative analysis is applied to solve it (Weeks & Schaffert, 2017). However, the disadvantages of the mixed-method are that the researcher must determine whether the various ways of reflecting different epistemological approaches. This leads to more challenges in addition to performing each component well since the researcher must justify what other people observe as incompatible epistemologies. The mixed-methods increase the evaluation complexity; the studies are complicated to plan and even conduct (Ertefaie et al., 2016). They require a researcher to be extremely careful in planning and describing all the related aspects regarding the research involving the study samples, primarily for quantitative portions, timing, and the expected plan to integrate the data. This is disadvantageous since combining qualitative and quantitative data during the analysis process could be challenging for most researchers (Söderhamn et al., 2016).
References
Ertefaie, A., Small, D., Flory, J., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Selection Bias When Using Instrumental Variable Methods to Compare Two Treatments But More Than Two Treatments Are Available. The International Journal Of Biostatistics,12 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2015-0006
Söderhamn, U., Kjøstvedt, H., & Slettebø, Å. (2016). Evaluation of ethical reflections in community healthcare.Nursing Ethics, 22 (2), 194-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014524762
Weeks, K., & Schaffert, C. (2017). Generational Differences in Definitions of Meaningful Work: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal Of Business Ethics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3621-4