NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools are always developed to evaluate the organizational capability in undertaking different roles including the production of goods as well as the delivery of effective services. Organizational assessment tools are sometimes applied in monitoring and evaluation. The organizational assessment tools can also be used by the organizations to set guidelines of criteria for evaluating the current management capacity to enhance the provision of quality services. In healthcare institutions, for example, there is always the need to assess the operational processes to ensure that there is effective operations as well as to identify key areas in the service delivery that requires strengthening (Stone, 2015). The Dollar general organization often use the organizational assessment tools to ensure that there is identification of potential areas of strength and weaknesses.

In the Dollar General Organization, the assessment tool results used indicated areas of weaknesses that strengths that the improvement processes can be based on. The assessment tools indicated that there is the need to improve service delivery processes to ensure that clients are satisfied. The application of the assessment tools results created a noticeable effects/impacts within the dollar general organization. Based on the assessment results, there was the formation different strategies on how to improve management processes in order to ensure that there is seamless delivery of different services (Stone, 2015). Also, the results from the assessment tools results can be applied to prompt the management to initiate effective services delivery to enhance the protection of customers or client’s rights. The implementation of changes will ensure that there is the general improvement in the operational processes.

Reference

Stone, K. B. (2015). Burke-Litwin Organizational Assessment Survey: Reliability and Validity. Organization Development Journal, 33(2). Retrieved from: https://web.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=08896402&AN=103722557&h=3pBkgCIMeUazYz3v3ASCjoBrvh86XGhI6QItlLYOOYKu051sLvqHiKPUYlf0QNjOUChM%2fWMUEIHRICj8HZBK9w%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d08896402%26AN%3d103722557

Your organization is ready to implement a quality improvement initiative; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that perhaps not everyone is on board with the proposal.

What could be contributing to this potential resistance? How might organizational culture impact or influence the ability to engage in quality improvement initiatives?

Photo Credit: M-SUR – stock.adobe.com

Organizational culture is the shared way of thinking or feeling in a given organization. This culture creates the dynamic for a willingness to change and/or improve. For example, if an organizational culture is one in which change is welcomed to improve and all voices are encouraged to be shared, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative will likely be accepted and supported. However, if an organizational culture is one in which the acknowledgement of mistakes are penalized and only leadership voices are respected, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative may be met with hesitation and skepticism.

For this Assignment, you will consider the impact of cultural and organizational readiness as it relates to the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. You will consider the leadership strategies needed to support these measures and complete an Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

To Prepare:

Review the Learning Resources regarding the implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
Consider what stakeholders must be present to implement these initiatives, and reflect on the leadership strategies needed for success in promoting quality improvement initiatives in healthcare organizations and nursing practice.
Select a healthcare organization or nursing practice (with which you are familiar) to complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice you selected. Then, address the following:

What is the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement?
Is the organizational culture present for quality improvement?
What leadership strategies are present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality?

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7

Submit your completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool and the responses to the prompts for this Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 6 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 6 Assignment 1

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

Content

Name: NURS_8302_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected.	Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) A fully completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.	Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) A mostly completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.	Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) An inaccurate or incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) An inaccurate and incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted, or it is missing.
Assess the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.	Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.	Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.	Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement, or it is missing.
Assess whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.	Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.	Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.	Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement, or it is missing.
Identify and assess leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.	Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response comprehensively assesses and fully identifies leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.	Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response identifies and assesses leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.	Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies, and may assess, the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected.

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

A fully completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

A mostly completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

An inaccurate or incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

An inaccurate and incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted, or it is missing.

Assess the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Assess whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Identify and assess leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response comprehensively assesses and fully identifies leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response identifies and assesses leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies, and may assess, the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100