coursework-banner

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools are always developed to evaluate the organizational capability in undertaking different roles including the production of goods as well as the delivery of effective services. Organizational assessment tools are sometimes applied in monitoring and evaluation. The organizational assessment tools can also be used by the organizations to set guidelines of criteria for evaluating the current management capacity to enhance the provision of quality services. In healthcare institutions, for example, there is always the need to assess the operational processes to ensure that there is effective operations as well as to identify key areas in the service delivery that requires strengthening (Stone, 2015). The Dollar general organization often use the organizational assessment tools to ensure that there is identification of potential areas of strength and weaknesses.

In the Dollar General Organization, the assessment tool results used indicated areas of weaknesses that strengths that the improvement processes can be based on. The assessment tools indicated that there is the need to improve service delivery processes to ensure that clients are satisfied. The application of the assessment tools results created a noticeable effects/impacts within the dollar general organization. Based on the assessment results, there was the formation different strategies on how to improve management processes in order to ensure that there is seamless delivery of different services (Stone, 2015). Also, the results from the assessment tools results can be applied to prompt the management to initiate effective services delivery to enhance the protection of customers or client’s rights. The implementation of changes will ensure that there is the general improvement in the operational processes.

 

Reference

Stone, K. B. (2015). Burke-Litwin Organizational Assessment Survey: Reliability and Validity. Organization Development Journal33(2). Retrieved from: https://web.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=08896402&AN=103722557&h=3pBkgCIMeUazYz3v3ASCjoBrvh86XGhI6QItlLYOOYKu051sLvqHiKPUYlf0QNjOUChM%2fWMUEIHRICj8HZBK9w%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d08896402%26AN%3d103722557

Your organization is ready to implement a quality improvement initiative; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that perhaps not everyone is on board with the proposal.

What could be contributing to this potential resistance? How might organizational culture impact or influence the ability to engage in quality improvement initiatives?

Photo Credit: M-SUR – stock.adobe.com

Organizational culture is the shared way of thinking or feeling in a given organization. This culture creates the dynamic for a willingness to change and/or improve. For example, if an organizational culture is one in which change is welcomed to improve and all voices are encouraged to be shared, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative will likely be accepted and supported. However, if an organizational culture is one in which the acknowledgement of mistakes are penalized and only leadership voices are respected, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative may be met with hesitation and skepticism.

For this Assignment, you will consider the impact of cultural and organizational readiness as it relates to the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. You will consider the leadership strategies needed to support these measures and complete an Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources regarding the implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
  • Consider what stakeholders must be present to implement these initiatives, and reflect on the leadership strategies needed for success in promoting quality improvement initiatives in healthcare organizations and nursing practice.
  • Select a healthcare organization or nursing practice (with which you are familiar) to complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice you selected. Then, address the following:

  • What is the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement?
  • Is the organizational culture present for quality improvement?
  • What leadership strategies are present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality?

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7

Submit your completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool and the responses to the prompts for this Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 6 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

 

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 6 Assignment 1

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational assessment tools or the organizational capacity assessment tools

Content

Name: NURS_8302_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

A fully completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

A mostly completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

An inaccurate or incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

An inaccurate and incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted, or it is missing.

Assess the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Assess whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Identify and assess leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response comprehensively assesses and fully identifies leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response identifies and assesses leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies, and may assess, the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100