NURS 8310 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology SOLUTION

NURS 8310 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology SOLUTION

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

  • Identify the disaster and resulting population health issue.
  • Describe the epidemiological considerations resulting from this disaster. Support your response with specific examples and evidence from the literature.
  • Discuss the factors that made the community’s and/or nation’s response effective or ineffective.
week 11 Discussion 1

     Disasters refer to unexpected large-scale events that disrupt communities and cause trauma, death, and destruction (Moynihan, 2009). An example of a disaster is Hurricane Katrina. Hurricane Katrina made a powerful category 3 storm at 6.10 am of August 29, 2005, in Louisiana. Hurricane Katrina disrupted basic utilities, food-distribution systems, health-care services, and communications in large portions of Louisiana and Mississippi (Moynihan, 2009). In the days after the hurricane struck, displacement of persons living in these areas resulted in the congregation of more than 200,000 persons in evacuation centers in at least 18 states.

In the wake of disasters, epidemiologists play a key role in identifying and characterizing the affected populations, assessing environmental exposures, quantifying physical and mental health impacts, and producing evidence to ascribe causation (Thorpe et al., 2015).  Hurricane Katrina led to various epidemiological considerations. Epidemiologists had a significant role in assessing environmental exposure through various strategies. Public health service and sanitation professionals had to evaluate the quality of the floodwaters that were being pumped into other water bo

NURS 8310 Discussion 1 Applied Epidemiology SOLUTION
NURS 8310 Discussion 1 Applied Epidemiology SOLUTION

dies to assess infectious and chemical agents as well as the impacts in other areas subject to gravitational unwatering (Coussens & Goldman, 2007). The water quality in the surrounding areas had to be monitored to successfully convey health warnings when the water was not safe for use. The inspection of the sea food supply in the food establishments, both wholesale and retail, had to be done to promote safety (Coussens & Goldman, 2007). Hazardous materials had to be monitored and debris sites monitored for environmental exposure. The monitoring of the indoor and outdoor air quality was essential, as well as dissemination of information on mold and dust, proper ways of removing it, what susceptible groups should avoid any exposure, and what appropriate personal protective equipment should be used to limit exposure (Coussens & Goldman, 2007). The safety of the workers involved in the rebuilding efforts had to be ensured by providing information on personal protective equipment, vaccines, and proper training and by monitoring illnesses and injuries. Epidemiologists had an important role in collecting data related to the post-disaster effects which could guide disease control or prevention measures.

The response to Hurricane Katrina involved an inter-governmental (federal, state, and local) and cross-sectoral (public, private and non-profit) network of actors. The effectiveness of the nation’s response to Hurricane Katrina has been viewed differently by various groups. While the risk of a major hurricane striking New Orleans had long been considered and there was enough warning of the threat which was made in advance of landfall, it is indicated that the responders failed to convert this information into a level of preparation appropriate with the scope of the impending disaster (Moynihan, 2009).The dispersed nature of authority in the US intergovernmental response system further weakened response, as federal responders failed to recognize the need to more actively engage (Moynihan, 2009). The lack of a clear directing authority encouraged responders to “freelance” without seeking to coordinate with appropriate authorities. For example, in the area of search and rescue, the heroic efforts of the Coast Guard have been rightly praised. But their quick response was also characterized by little effort to coordinate with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), state agencies, the National Guard or the Department of Defense, who were also running search operations (Moynihan, 2009). As a result, there was duplication of effort in some neighborhoods, and a lack of attention to others. In any case, many of the key institutional capacities to manage the response at every level of government were inadequate (Moynihan, 2009).The poor response arose from a failure to manage a number of risk factors (Moynihan, 2009). This indicates the importance of collaboration among stakeholders and adequate preparedness in the effective response to disinters.


Coussens, C., & Goldman, L. (Eds.). (2007). Environmental Public Health Impacts of Disasters: Hurricane Katrina: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press.

Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The response to hurricane Katrina. Geneva (Italy): International Risk Governance Council, 27-45.

Thorpe, L., Assari, S., Deppen, S., Glied, S., Lurie, N., & Mauer, M. et al. (2015). The role of epidemiology in disaster response policy development. Annals of Epidemiology25(5), 377-386.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:  NURS 8310 Discussion 1 Applied Epidemiology SOLUTION

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.


Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource