Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
Grand Canyon University Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Organizations may have developed a detailed interview process with standard questions for each position, pre-employment assessments, and other selection tools assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Topic 3 DQ 1
A standard interview question for a Registered Nurse- BSN is, “What are your values?” I developed this question to understand how candidates approach what is right in their line of work. The question will help ensure that the applicant’s views are consistent with the organization’s core values like integrity, trust, honesty, and reliability. Individuals and organizations often have values that influence their actions. Therefore, value-based interview questions are important to ensure the potential employee can easily blend in with a particular organization’s culture (Power, 2018).
The question will help identify an applicant with values similar to the organization and the current team or values that will augment the current organizational team. The question is crucial because if a potential employee’s values are very different from the organization or the current team, the employee will find it challenging working with the team and fail to enjoy and put their all in attaining the organization’s goals (Philipps & Mrowczynski, 2021). Furthermore, applicants for an RN job should have concerns about what values are promoted and upheld in the organization of their potential employer.
The above interview question has no right and wrong responses. However, I would expect the candidate to explain in detail their values and how they align to their job as an RN rather than mentioning values superficially. I would expect the interviewee to have researched the organization’s culture and the values that the organization accepts or turns away (Power, 2018). For instance, if one of the organization’s values is integrity, I expect the candidate to have a similar personal value. Besides, I would requ
ire them to define integrity from their understanding, what it entails, and how they uphold integrity in their p
ersonal and professional lives. In addition, I would expect a candidate to describe how they would make other employees aware of these values and how the employee would champion for the values to be upheld in the workplace.
References
Philipps, A., & Mrowczynski, R. (2021). Getting more out of interviews. Understanding interviewees’ accounts in relation to their frames of orientation. Qualitative Research, 21(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119867548
Power, R. (2018). P69 Recruiting our workforce using value based interviewing. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 3(Suppl 1), A34-A34.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||