SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
Grand Canyon University SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
After the introduction, move into the main part of the SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the SOLVED: Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze how an organization’s quality and improvement processes contribute to its risk management program.
This assignment builds on the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment you completed in Topic 1 of this course.
Assume that the sample risk management program you analyzed in Topic 1 was implemented and is now currently in use by your health care employer/organization. Further assume that your supervisor has asked you to create a high‐level summary brief of this new risk management program to share with a group of administrative personnel from a newly created community health organization in your state who has enlisted your organization’s assistance in developing their own risk management policies and procedures.
Compose a 1,250‐1,500 word summary brief that expands upon the elements you first addressed in the Topic 1 assignment. In this summary brief, address the following points regarding your health care organization and its risk management program:
Explain the role of your organization’s MIPPA-approved accreditation body (e.g., JC, ACR, IAC) in the evaluation of your institution’s quality improvement and risk management processes.
Describe the roles that different levels of administrative personnel play in healthcare ethics and establishing or sustaining employer/employee-focused organizational risk management strategies and operational policies.
Illustrate how your organization’s risk management and compliance programs support ethical standards, patient consent, and patient rights and responsibilities.
Explain the legal and ethical responsibilities health care professionals face in upholding risk management policies and administering safe health care at your organization.
Relate how your organization’s quality improvement processes support and contribute to its overall journey to excellence.
In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of three peer‐reviewed references.
Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part Two
Risk management plays a crucial role in preventing risks to healthcare organizations, patients, healthcare providers, and the community. Risk management helps in fostering evaluation, creation, implementation, and monitoring of the probable risks to prevent or reduce risk exposure. As such, the implementation of risk management programs is crucial in promoting the safety of stakeholders within the healthcare organization (Bargmann & Brundrett, 2020). Therefore, it is imperative to carefully implement such programs based on the given guidelines to ensure the realization of the full benefits in the long term. The successful implementation of the risk management program sufficient insights from various aspects of such initiatives including the responsibilities of MIPPA-approved accreditation bodies and the responsibilities tasked on various levels of the administrative workforce in healthcare ethics. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to explore different aspects of the risk management initiative involving the prevention of patient falls, which was explored in the first part of this project.
The Role of Organization’s MIPPA-Approved Accreditation Body
The MIPPA-approved accreditation body used in my healthcare organization is the Joint Commission (JC). The role of JC is to consistently enhance the safety and quality of healthcare delivered to the public by ensuring the delivery of healthcare accreditation and associated services that promote performance improvement in healthcare facilities. The JC has also created standards to fulfill its mission of enabling healthcare organizations to carry out sound assessment processes to review, examine, and improve performance. These standards emphasize the essential patient, personal, or resident care and the roles of the organization that are crucial in the delivery of high-quality and safe care (Despotou et al., 2020). The JC’s state-of-the-art standards place expectations for sound, attainable, and survivable organizations’ performance. JC also plays a critical role as a convener, associate, and listener. As such, the JC plays a shared role because it works alongside the healthcare organization to achieve accreditation and certification, diffuse information, gauge performance, participate in public policy programs, and ensure patient safety. Moreover, the JC also performs organizational assessments against the existing standards and participates in the decision-making process for accreditation.
The JC proposes measures that facilitate loss mitigation actions in the organization. These measures include Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and a systematic approach to addressing the causes of accidents and overcoming them (Despotou et al., 2020). The RCA is critical in fall prevention by facilitating the identification and scrutiny of reasons for falls and their solutions. The FMEA is vital in recognizing the weaknesses in the highly risky procedures and clinical services. The FMEA measures and proposals enable the organization to recognize risks depending on different procedures and how limitations of different services can trigger risks of falls.
The Role that Different Levels of Administrative Personnel Play in Healthcare Ethics and Risk Management Strategies and Operational Policies
Managers play a crucial role in overseeing the risk investigation and prevention initiatives to ensure they are rationalized and properly attain their intended objectives. The managers in charge of risk management and procurement are tasked with the responsibility of ensuring that healthcare organization has sufficient resources to address the risk. They should ensure that the setting has special equipment such as devices to assist in the movement of patients, which are crucial in the realization of quality standards and safety as required by the Joint Commission. The manager in charge of risk management is tasked with the role of risk identification and analysis. They scrutinize all the services in the organization to recognize possible sources of risk. They also partner with departments to identify contributory risk factors in the organization. Collectively, managers in the risk department work in collaboration with other teams to create awareness among all stakeholders on how to implement different aspects of risk management initiatives in their departments (Wang, 2018).
The department of human resources has a responsibility of ensuring that the healthcare organization has the appropriate workforce to implement risk management procedures. The department is required to qualified and sufficient workforce to enhance healthcare services given to people. The objective of hiring enough personnel is to provide a proper patient-nurse ratio to help in minimizing the risk of falls due to insufficient nursing care and help. Training healthcare providers is also an important responsibility of the human resources department to ensure the workforce has the needed skills and competency to execute different risk prevention standards formulated by the healthcare organization.
The information technology (IT) department is also critical in implementing different security measures to trail and assess the movement of patients within the healthcare setting to minimize risks of falls. IT department can also adopt various technologies necessary in implementing safety standards and vital procedures in the management of falls in the hospital.
How the organization’s Risk Management and Compliance Programs Support Ethical Standards, Patient Consent, and Patient Rights and Responsibilities
The objective of fall prevention initiatives was to minimize the risks of fall occurrence. The organization adopted the Total Quality Management measure to ensure that different organization procedures, services, and processes are in line with the JC standards for risk management. This initiative examines all the activities and processes to detect possible weaknesses and address them based on the standards of JC to create risk assessment protocols. The protocols also elevate the safety and vigilance standards to avert risks. The organization has equally adopted structural changes including proper bed heights and alert warnings, which are informed by the FMEA standards that task organizations to recognize processes and structures that may lead to or address considerable risks. The organization’s legal department has also implemented measures to address ethical concerns including breach of patient privacy and confidentiality (Pozgar, 2019). This department ensures that activities such as patient tracking and movement investigation do not breach patient privacy.
Legal and Ethical Responsibilities of Health Care Professionals
Health care professionals are expected to uphold various legal and ethical responsibilities when implementing risk management policies and administering safe health care in the organization (Pozgar, 2019). One of the responsibilities is upholding patient privacy. Some measures such as trailing patients tend to expose the organization to various privacy and ethical issues including data safety and security. Clinicians should be careful because a breach of patient privacy could lead to negative consequences. The other responsibility is to safeguard patients against damages or injuries. However, this responsibility is often challenging to be upheld due to issues such as limited resources leading to compromise in the quality of care. The other responsibility is to ensure the informed consent of patients. However, obtaining informed consent is always challenging in situations where there are controversies in the opinions between patients and healthcare providers. Moreover, sometimes patient information is accidentally exposed, which is a significant ethical and legal challenge.
How quality improvement processes support contribute to the program’s excellence.
The quality improvement process is essential in ensuring that the healthcare setting adheres to different regulatory and legal measures leading to reduced controversies within different regulatory bodies. As a result, the organization’s reputation is elevated. The quality improvement processes also help the organization to obtain positive reviews from the clients and also facilitate the identification of probable areas that need improvement. Effective quality improvement measures also improve employee loyalty and commitment to the safety and quality protocols in the organization. The integration of the processes also enables the organization to enhance its services and recognize mistakes and issues that may compromise the quality improvement progress.
Conclusion
Risk management initiatives in the healthcare system are crucial components of the quality improvement processes and they are crucial in enabling the organization to reduce quality and safety challenges that patients and healthcare professionals could potentially experience in the healthcare organization. The MIPPA-approved accreditation body used in the current hospital is JC. Different administrative personnel in the organization work collaboratively at various levels to ensure the successful implementation of the risk management program. The program was developed to ensure compliance with the ethical code of conduct when providing care to patients. Taken together, the risk management program plays a critical role in the entire organization’s success and excellence.
References
Bargmann, A. L., & Brundrett, S. M. (2020). Implementation of a multicomponent fall prevention program: Contracting with patients for fall safety. Military medicine, 185(Supplement_2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz411
Despotou, G., Her, J., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2020). Nurses’ perceptions of joint commission international accreditation on patient safety in tertiary care in South Korea: a Pilot Study. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(4), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(20)30011-9
Pozgar, G. D. (2019). Legal and ethical issues for health professionals. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Wang, L. (2018). Research on risk management for healthcare supply chain in hospital. Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom).