coursework-banner

The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:·   Planning and requirements definition·   Analysis·   Design of the new system·   Implementation·   Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
25 pts

· Analysis· Design of the new system

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
25 pts

· Implementation· Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Using the literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing
25 pts

Resources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good
Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor
Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
10 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts

 

Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development Life Cycle

Systems development life cycle (SDLC) is a theoretical framework applied in project management. It defines the stages entailed in an information system development project, from the initial feasibility study to the maintenance of the finished application (Kramer, 2018). SDLC phases include planning, system analysis, design, implementation, integration and testing, and operations and maintenance. Engaging nurses who are the end-users in all phases of introducing a new healthcare technology fosters a smooth transition to using the new technology system and increases nurses’ buy-in of the system (Verma & Gupta, 2017). This paper will describe the role of a graduate-level nurse as part of the implementation team developing a new nursing documentation system.

Planning and Requirements Definition

The planning and requirements definition stage is when developers and the implementation team plan for the upcoming project. The stage involves defining the problem and scope of any existing system and determining the objectives for the proposed new system (Kramer, 2018). The role of the graduate-level nurse in this phase will be to identify goals for the new nursing documentation system based on the priority nursing needs. Besides, the nurse will explain to the implementation team the expected requirements of the system in a coherent fashion so that the procured system does not become redundant (Verma & Gupta, 2017)

. The nurse will identify improvement areas in the previous documentation system, which the new system should address to promote quality patient care and enhance nursing documentation. Involving the nurse in the planning phase of technology system development is crucial in ensuring a better-developed system, which is different and more clinically relevant.

Analysis

The analysis stage involves the team gathering all the details required for the new system and identifying the first ideas for prototypes. The team also identifies all the specifications for hardware, s

Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation
Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation

oftware, and network requirements for the system they plan to develop (Ehrler et al., 2019). In this phase, the nurse’s role will be to conduct a feasibility analysis and evaluate the system’s compatibility with the organization’s environment.

Design of  New System

The graduate-level nurse’s role will be to assist the implementation team in anticipating and incorporating patients’ and nurses’ needs when designing the documentation system. The nurse has a responsibility to ensure that the system is designed to promote positive outcomes for the patients and improve the delivery of nursing care (Ehrler et al., 2019). In addition, the nurse wi

 

ll be involved in defining a standardized nursing language that will be used in documentation to ensure accurate communication of patient care among nurses using the system. The nurse must work closely with the implementation team to define standardized nursing terminology and outline and define the nursing scope in the documentation that should reflect on the new documentation system (Verma & Gupta, 2017). Involving the nurse in the design phase will ensure that the documentation system is developed in a way that the nurses will easily use when providing patient care and that will meet the predetermined needs. It will also ensure the effective integration of the new documentation system into nursing practice.

Implementation

The implementation phase entails integrating the new system into its environment and eventually installing it. The new software is adopted and used by many users (Kramer, 2018). It may or may not produce the expected results. The nurse will be tasked with beta testing the new documentation system, meaning that they will test it as users. In addition, the nurse will take part in testing the new system before it is availed for implementation in the organization (Verma & Gupta, 2017). It is essential that a nurse is involved in the implementation phase before the new system is adopted since nurses are an important link to various clinical processes in healthcare (Verma & Gupta, 2017). Besides, nurses are in a great position to offer crucial feedback about the changes required in the system to make it more effective during the implementation periods and after the implementation of the new system.

Post-Implementation Support

Various problems can occur when the documentation system is in the post-implementation phase in the clinical setting. The graduate-level nurse has the role of identifying such issues when interacting with other nurses, who are the end-users (Kramer, 2018). Besides, the nurse is in a better position to propose an alternative that is more practical and clinically relevant to the implementation team in order to make the system more efficient (Ehrler et al., 2019). It is essential that the nurse is involved in this phase since they are in the best position to enlighten the implementation team of the benefits and challenges they encounter when using the new documentation system.

Conclusion

Nurses must be included in the initial stages of the system development cycle. This ensures an efficient system that translates the language of nursing practice into the system being used. As the majority of end-users of health technology systems, nurses will adopt new technologies if they are allowed to give input into the planning and implementation processes. This is by giving views on how the system should be designed to meet priority needs in care delivery. They should also be involved in the evaluation process to establish whether changes designed to improve the delivery of patient care have been effective.

 

 

References

Ehrler, F., Lovis, C., & Blondon, K. (2019). A Mobile Phone App for Bedside Nursing Care: Design and Development Using an Adapted Software Development Life Cycle Model. JMIR mHealth and uHealth7(4), e12551. https://doi.org/10.2196/12551

Kramer, M. (2018). Best practices in systems development lifecycle: An analysis based on the waterfall model. Review of Business & Finance Studies9(1), 77-84.

Verma, M. P., & Gupta, S. (2017). Software Development for Nursing: Role of Nursing Informatics. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research5(2), 203-207. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-2660.2017.00044.8

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource