NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
South University NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the South University NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the South University NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
The introduction for the South University NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
The American Health Care Act (AHCA) is a proposed health care policy that partially repeals and replaces the Affordable Care Act (ACA). It was passed in May 2017 by the House of Representatives and awaits a ruling by the Senate. The Bill was proposed to improve health care equity and cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this assignment will be to discuss my stand on the AHCA and the rationale for supporting or opposing it.
Part 1: Leave Behind
- The AHCA is a proposed health care policy that seeks to partially repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
- I do not support the AHCA since it seeks to halt the ACA’s income-based tax credits for buying insurance.
- It will put an end to the increased federal funding for states that expanded Medicaid.
- AHCA system of tax credits is based on age instead of income, which will greatly affect low-income families.
- It introduces penalty in the form of raised premiums for Americans who fail to maintain continuous coverage.
- The penalty might result in a high number of uninsured Americans.
- AHCA will eliminate funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which provides for investment in prevention and public health programs.
- The AHCA will thus halt efforts to improve health and contain the rate of increasing health care costs.
- It will lower the number of Americans who access preventative care.
NSG4068 W3 Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist Advocate for Health Care Policy - The AHCA does not appear financially sound compared to the ACA.
- It will decrease employment and economic activity in the long term.
- Even though it will abolish the tax penalty for Americans without health insurance, it will decrease incentives to purchase insurance, thus increasing the number of uninsured.
Part 2: Rationale for the Position in the “Leave Behind” Page
I oppose the AHCA bill because it does not appear financially sound. Repealing and replacing ACA with AHCA will significantly reduce the number of Americans with insurance coverage, which will reverse the gains made since the ACA was enacted. According to Ku et al. (2017), if the AHCA Act becomes law, predictions show that the overall U.S. economy will have a loss of 924,000 jobs by 2026. A majority of these job losses will be in the health care field, yet it is one of the areas that had the highest job growth in the past years (Ku et al., 2017). Besides, the AHCA will eliminate almost all of the ACA’s revenue provisions.
The tax repeal policies such as the repeal of Medicare-related taxes will predominantly help Americans with high incomes or selected businesses. High-income families would enjoy net benefits from the tax and spending changes proposed in the AHCA, while low-income families would face net losses (Blumberg et al., 2017). Higher-income families would benefit the most from the tax cut. On the other hand, cutbacks in federal funding for health benefits would adversely affect low-income families (Blumberg et al., 2017). If implemented alone, the coverage-related policies may result in steep job losses over time, getting to 1.9 million by 2026, driven by deep Medicaid cut downs (Blumberg et al., 2017). In addition to the major increases in the number of uninsured Americans, AHCA could lead to a period of medical and economic hardship in the U.S.
AHCA seeks to eliminate funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which allocates investment in prevention and public health programs to improve health and contain high health care costs (Ku et al., 2017). Eliminating this funding will halt prevention and public health programs, which have been crucial in improving the health and wellbeing of Americans and improving health outcomes. This might result in increased cases of preventable communicable and non-communicable diseases resulting in increased utilization of healthcare services and high healthcare costs.
Part 3: Scenario Surrounding the Legislative Visit
I presented my stand on the AHCA to the Congress representative in my state, a Republican. The legislator was in support of the AHCA, while I was against it. Despite the difference in opinions, he granted me the opportunity to argue my case on why I was opposing the AHCA. The Congress representative stated that he supported AHCA because it is designed to improve cost-effectiveness and health care equity. He believes that it will improve cost-effectiveness in healthcare by repealing tax penalties on Americans for failing to maintain health coverage and on employers for failing to offer coverage. Besides, he stated that AHCA is a reconciliation bill, which will only affect the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the ACA. He further explained that the AHCA would eliminate about $900 billion in taxes imposed by the ACA on higher-income taxpayers, health care providers, and insurers.
In opposition to the representative’s position, I would argue that the exclusion of waivers proposed by the AHCA would decrease health insurance enrollment, and the loss of health insurance would increase in the coming years. For instance, the proposed tax repeal policies, such as the repeal of Medicare-related taxes, will mainly help Americans with high incomes (Ku et al., 2017). High-income families would enjoy net benefits from the tax and spending changes, while low-income families face net losses. Consequently, there would be an increased number of uninsured Americans from low-income families (Ku et al., 2017). The AHCA would reverse the ACA’s impact in increasing the number of insured Americans from low-income families.
I would make a case that a majority of adults aged 50 to 64 years and most Americans with incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level will pay more for individual-market insurance under the AHCA than under the ACA. The high costs for older adults, to a degree, reflect that the tax credits proposed by the AHCA do not increase as sharply with age as premiums (Claxton et al., 2017). In addition, I would point out that the AHCA proposal to limit federal regulation and allow states to exercise more regulatory authority would place greater personal responsibility on Americans for their health and the cost of their care.
The Congress representative opposes the ACA, which imposes ten categories of essential health benefits that non-group and small-group policies must cover. The AHCA will permit states to obtain waivers to amend the required benefits to help lower premiums (Claxton et al., 2017). I would argue that reducing the essential health benefits to provide for less expensive insurance options would eliminate access to certain benefits for Americans who need them (Claxton et al., 2017). Besides, the essential benefits are crucial in ensuring that all Americans have the right to access health.
Working as a nurse before and after the enactment of the ACA made me realize how it significantly reduces the number of uninsured Americans. This resulted in more Americans accessing healthcare services, including specialized diagnostic and treatment services. Consequently, I would oppose any bill that would potentially increase the number of uninsured Americans or reduce access to specialized services. Besides, I oppose the bill since preventative care is crucial in reducing the number of patients who present with diseases in the advanced stages. In my nursing experience, prevention and public health programs help identify persons with underdiagnosed chronic illnesses and lead to early treatment interventions, promoting better health outcomes.
NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy Conclusion
The AHCA seeks to replace and repeal and replace the ACA. It seeks to repeal the individual and employer mandates, change the ACA’s age-based rate banding, changing income-based subsidies in the individual market to age-based subsidies. It will also allow states to define their essential health benefits rather than using the ten sets from the ACA. I oppose the AHCA because it will reduce the number of insured Americans, especially from low-income families, and result in job loss in healthcare. It will also reduce access to preventative care by halting prevention and public health programs.
NSG4068_W3_Project First Steps on Becoming a Grassroots Lobbyist/Advocate for Health Care Policy References
Blumberg, L. J., Buettgens, M., Holahan, J., Mermin, G., & Sammartino, F. (2017). Who gains and who loses under the American Health Care Act. Washington, DC.
Claxton, G., Pollitz, K., Semanskee, A., & Levitt, L. (2017). Would States Eliminate Key Benefits If AHCA Waivers Are Enacted?. Kaiser Family Foundation, June, 14.
Ku, L., Steinmetz, E., Brantley, E., Holla, N., & Bruen, B. K. (2017). The American Health Care Act: Economic and Employment Consequences for States. Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund), 17, 1.