Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies                   

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies   depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies                   

The introduction for the Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies                   

After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies   assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies                   

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies                   

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

To Prepare:
• Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
• Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
• Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
• For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies

synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:
• Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
• Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
• Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
• In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
• Use APA format and include a title page.
• Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

Critical Care

Health information technologies have significantly transformed the provision of healthc

are in the modern world. Health organizations continue to adopt health information technologies that enhance their ability to achieve care outcomes such as quality, efficiency, and safety in the patient care process. Nurses and other healthcare providers are responsible for determining the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of the different technologies utilized in healthcare. Therefore, the purpose of this research paper is to perform a literature review on the use of telemedicine in patients suffering from cardiovascular health problems.

Literature Review

The first study included in the review is the research by Jiménez-Marrero et al., (2020). The authors evaluated the efficacy of telemedicine-based intervention for patients suffering from chronic heart failure and ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40%. The study was a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial (Insuficienca Cardiaca Optimitzacio Remota iCOR study). The participants in the study were 178 patients who were randomly assigned to either usual care or telemedicine. The results obtained after six months of follow-up showed that the incidence of acute non-fatal heart events was significantly lower in the intervention group (telemedicine) compared to the usual care group. There was also a significant reduction in heart-failure-related costs in telemedicine compared to the usual care group. Therefore, it can be learned from this article that telemedicine reduces adverse events and healthcare costs in heart failure patients compared to usual care.

The other study is the systematic review by Battineni et al., (2021). The research analyzed the usefulness of telemedicine systems for providing personalized care needed to prevent cardiovascular disease. Articles for the review were obtained from databases that included Scopus, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search led to 19 articles that met the developed inclusion criteria. The analysis of data showed that telemedicine interventions modify morbidity and mortality if administered promptly to patients with cardiovascular diseases. The results also showed that telemedicine could reduce access to hospitals and other services when not necessary and pressure in hospitals by lowering the acute occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, it can be learned from this article that telemedicine interventions improve the treatment outcomes of cardiovascular diseases. It also reduces intense pressure on healthcare systems due to the rise in cardiovascular cases and unnecessary hospital visits and hospitalizations.

The third article is the research by Farabi et al., (2020), which systematically reviewed the economic evaluation of studies that compared the effectiveness of telemedicine with usual care for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases. The systematic review utilized articles that were obtained from databases that included Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, SID, Magiran, Scopus, and Global Health. The search yielded more than 20 articles that were included in the review. The analysis of data from the articles showed that telemedicine improves clinical outcomes for patients suffering from cardiovascular disorders. It also reduces healthcare costs that patients incur. As a result, concurrent use of telemedicine with usual care interventions could be more cost-effective. It is learned from this article that besides improving health outcomes, telemedicine reduces the healthcare costs that patients with cardiovascular diseases incur.

The last article is a systematic review by Rush et al., (2018). The authors compared the efficacy of virtual education delivery with usual care on patient outcomes in patients suffering from chronic illnesses. The authors searched databases that included CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for literature sources. The search yielded 16 articles that were included in the review. The analysis of data showed that telehealth modalities that were utilized in the studies included web, videoconferencing, telephone, and television interventions delivered to patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and heart failure. The results also showed that virtually-delivered interventions were associated with significantly improved outcomes compared to usual care or control conditions. Therefore, it is learned from this study that telehealth or telemedicine is associated with improved outcomes compared to the usual care in patients suffering from chronic illnesses such as heart failure.

Conclusion

The findings from the above articles show that telemedicine or telehealth is highly effective for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases. The data from the articles agree that telemedicine improves patient outcomes in cardiovascular diseases. The outcomes include the modification of morbidity and mortality rates among the patients. The results also showed that telemedicine reduces the healthcare costs that patients with cardiovascular diseases incur. The reduction is attributed to the minimization of adverse events associated with the diseases. There is also a reduction in unnecessary hospital visits, which translates into cost-effectiveness in healthcare. The results of the analysis also demonstrated that telemedicine reduces pressure on hospitals due to increased cases of cardiovascular diseases. It also eliminates unnecessary seeking of healthcare services by the patients. Therefore, the authors recognize the need for the incorporation of telemedicine into the usual care offered to patients suffering from chronic illnesses such as heart failure and diabetes. The incorporation will enhance patient outcomes in the treatment process.

References

Battineni, G., Sagaro, G. G., Chintalapudi, N., & Amenta, F. (2021). The Benefits of Telemedicine in Personalized Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD): A Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(7), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11070658

Farabi, H., Rezapour, A., Jahangiri, R., Jafari, A., Rashki Kemmak, A., & Nikjoo, S. (2020). Economic evaluation of the utilization of telemedicine for patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. Heart Failure Reviews, 25(6), 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-019-09864-4

Jiménez-Marrero, S., Yun, S., Cainzos-Achirica, M., Enjuanes, C., Garay, A., Farre, N., Verdú, J. M., Linas, A., Ruiz, P., Hidalgo, E., Calero, E., & Comín-Colet, J. (2020). Impact of telemedicine on the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of patients with chronic heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction managed in a multidisciplinary chronic heart failure programme: A sub-analysis of the iCOR randomized trial. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(1–2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18796439

Rush, K. L., Hatt, L., Janke, R., Burton, L., Ferrier, M., & Tetrault, M. (2018). The efficacy of telehealth delivered educational approaches for patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(8), 1310–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.006