DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Grand Canyon University DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
DNP 815 Topic 2 DQ 1
Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning. Describe how inductive versus deductive reasoning is used in your chosen nursing theory. Provide examples and literature support.
Sample Answer for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
The reasoning is categorized into two types which are inductive or forward and deductive or backward wherein each has different features and plays different roles in providing solutions to complex problems. The inductive reasoning process is that individual facts are observed first before making a conclusion on a principle, however, the deductive reasoning process is solving given problems based on consideration of general principles and knowledge of a solid foundation. In order to achieve the major goal, inductive reasoning or means-ends analysis is considered a data-driven approach and more useful in finding a solution quickly, whereas deductive reasoning or moving backward gradually gets rids of things that are not necessary and spends more time deleting wrong answers or inferences to look for the root causes of a problem (Shin, 2019).
Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies in guiding the interpretation and application of the findings where it illuminates research and structure knowledge to build nursing science and nursing practice (Valentine & Sekula, 2020). PICOT is one way to streamline the process of research literature and by using it as a format, it focuses the search for evidence. Concentrating on evidence of effective interventions is a good way of improving clinical judgment and prevents one’s practice of falling into traditional care without any advancements (Black, 2019).
The concepts of inductive and deductive reasoning in clinical reasoning apply to gathering appropriate information and making a clinical diagnosis by providing scientific evidence on the outcomes of good quality nursing care.
References
Black, B, P. (2019). The science of nursing and evidence-based practice. Professional Nursing E-Book: Concepts and Challenges, 217.
Professional Nursing E-Book – Google Books
Shin, H.S. (2019). Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 31 (4), 299-308.
https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.140
Valentine, J.L., Sekula, K., Lynch (2020) Evolution of forensic theory- introduction of the constructed theory of forensic nursing care: A Middle-Range Theory. Journal of Forensic Nursing
Valentine_May2020_Evolution_of_Forensic_Nursing_Theory.pdf (researchgate.net)
Sample Answer 2 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Great job on your post. I like it a lot. My favorite part was when you mentioned that nurses are responsible for life-long learning and that this is to prevent stagnation as well as harm to the clients we care for. In an article done by
Mlambo, Silén, and McGrath in 2021, it was talked about not only how important it is for nursing professionals to continue education as well as development; however, there is also a negative. This study found that education or professional development opportunities are not as available as they should be for the nurses in question (Mlambo, Silén, & McGrath, 2021). This is something I have noticed in the clinical setting. Oftentimes, the facility will assign education to the staff; however, when it came to professional development, things became a little more difficult. For example, there is little to no reimbursement for a practicing ER nurse to take the CEN (Certified Emergency Nurse) board exam which costs several hundreds of dollars. Then, when this certification is achieved, that has to be renewed every 4 years, the nurse only gets a couple of dollars an hour increase. This does not give a lot of incentive to get said certification. Also, many nurses are already BSN upon undergraduate graduation. This means, education-wise, the nurse needs now a master’s or doctorate degree, which very few facilities cover fully. Continuing education and development are important; however, it needs to be more attainable for said nurses.
References
Mlambo, M., Silén, C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature – BMC nursing. BioMed Central. Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2#citeas
Sample Answer 3 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
What an insightful post this is. I cannot agree with you less when you noted that “Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies.” My PICOT, quality improvement project, will be underpinned by two theoretical lens of which middle-range theory is one of them. I paired it with Faith Community Theory of Nursing because two provides clear direction on how to navigate the process including data collection and data analysis. Alligood and Fawcett (2017) noted that limited, narrower, and easily explored attributes of middle-range theories made the allure in nursing practice. It is important to state that middle range theories and Faith Community Theory of nursing guide evidence-based studies or projects such as DNP projects, in addition to providing a solid foundation for nursing practice. Nursing theories attempts to describe, predict, or explain phenomena consistent with nursing’s perspective (Dewey, 2017), It is important to stress that the product of nursing science is nursing practice.
References
Alligood, M. R., & Fawcett, J. (2017). The Theory of the Art of Nursing and the Practice of Human Care Quality. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 23(1), 4–12.
Dewey, J. (2020). Nursing theory. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health.
Sample Answer 4 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
An evidenced based approach is the best way to ensure patients receive optimal outcomes. Staying abreast of new evidence allows patients to receive the best possible care. When determining if an intervention should be implemented in a patient population the PICOT format is a great framework to use. The PICOT answers clinical questions by identifying supportive evidence. This allows the learner to focus directly on what is being questioned. The PICOT strategy also leads to an unbiased efficient search (Eriksen & Frandsen, 2018). This allows the learner to evaluate literature and decide if the components support the question.
Reference
Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
Sample Answer 5 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is the act of developing an idea or theory and works by making specific observations and then moving toward broad speculation or generalizations (Streefkerk, 2022). This goes with watching and compiling research on observations found in the field. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, induction is assessing and inferring the plausibility of an outcome based on an action (Hayes et al., 2018).
Deductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is where a theory or idea is tested. This ideology goes from making broad speculation or generalizations to specific observations (Streefkerk, 2022). This is where an idea is tested and an outcome is determined. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, deductive reasoning is the opposite of induction in which an inference is tested and then observed (Hayes et al., 2018).
The main difference between the two is that one implies just research and knowledge whereas one requires research, knowledge, and action.
When it comes to my project, deductive reasoning is more the process of the project versus inductive. The project focuses on implementing a standardized approach toward giving patient handoff and then observing the outcomes. The goal is to determine if the standardized handoff is a better approach than the current practice in order to improve client care and safety. I am still figuring out all of the kinks in my project, but this is the gist, which falls under deductive reasoning.
Roy’s Adaptation Model (RAM) depicts nursing logically as science, but connections between mind and intuition show nursing as an art. RAM was developed and used in nursing education, nursing administration, and nursing research. One of the many values of using RAM as a foundational model for DPI projects is that it promotes exploration of the effectiveness of new interventions, theory testing, and development. (Roy, 2009) (Butt & Rich, 2018). Research requires analysis that often crosses between inductive and conventional reasoning. ((Armet, et al., 2018). Inductive reasoning takes a general rule from repeated observations of a fact. In deductive reasoning, a general rule has a theoretical basis and which are used to predict a result of a certain case. (Upmeier zu Belzen, et al., 2021). When the results follow each case fits this rule. Providing evidence of deductive reasoning is truth. Deductive reasoning shows the basis and cause are used to make predictable outcomes. that something must be inductive reasoning to show that something will work. (Upmeier zu Belzen, et al., 2021). Implementing a quality improvement that requires teaching, learning, and empirical investigations use different inquiry often interpreted as deductive reasoning, (Upmeier zu Belzen, et al., 2021). RAM, the process of nursing is based on human experiences and responses may be approached in a nontraditional way. Research methods using qualitative includes deductive and inductive reasoning. RAM provides a framework for describing human experiences and tools required to anticipate and control clinical outcomes to improve health outcomes. Roy’s adaptation model focuses on systematic controlled plans and providing holistic care. (Jennings, 2017). Healthy coping mechanisms are essential for patients with ESRD in their adaptation to dialysis and its challenges. In this study, coping or adaptation is the central concept used in the Roy Adaptation Model. Using deductive reasoning for a population such as patients with ESRD may show that coping and adapting require assistance, such as case management, mental health, etc. (Mbeje & Ntombifikile, 2021). Through deductive reasoning, qualitative measures show that patients with ESRD have an altered quality of life. RAM is an appropriate model to use because individuals diagnosed with ESRD are making and adjusting to multiple factors, internally and externally. Patients with ESRD may experience multiple physiological symptoms, altered self-concept, and lack of independence. The use of inductive reasoning may indicate that through case management and education the patient may have improved quality of life. (Nobahar, et al., 2020).
Armat, M. R., Assarroudi, A., Rad, M., Sharifi, H., & Heydari, A. (2018). Inductive and Deductive: Ambiguous Labels in Qualitative Content Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 219-221. https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/inductive-deductive-ambiguous-labels-qualitative/docview/2122314268/se-2DP 2
Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (Eds.). (2018). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN-13: 9781284112245
Jennings K. M. (2017). The Roy Adaptation Model: A Theoretical Framework for Nurses Providing Care to Individuals with Anorexia Nervosa. ANS. Advances in nursing science, 40(4), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000175
Mbeje, Pretty N., & Mtshali, Ntombifikile. (2021). Perceived predictors of quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Curationis, 44(1), 1-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v44i1.2251
Nobahar M, Saffari M, Babamohamadi H, Sotodehasl N, Mirmohammadkhani M. The effect of a care plan based on the Roy adaptation model on general health in hemodialysis patients; a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Renal Inj Prev. 2020; 9(2): e11. doi: 10.34172/jrip.2020.11.
Sample Answer 5 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning is basic form of reasoning that starts from a general statement and helps to reach logical conclusion. Deductive reasoning starts with hypothesis , examines the possibilities and arrive at a logical conclusion. According to Marei et al (2017) Scientific method applies deductive reasoning to test hypothesis as well as theories which enables the prediction of outcomes. There is always a first premise and a second then final inference or conclusion based on evidence. A logical conclusion achieved with the help of minor and major premise. For example, a major premise: D is E could be followed with a minor premise F is D bringing us to a conclusion that F is also deduced to be E. Another example: all pigs have a tail and a piglet is a pig. Morosoli et al (2019) agree that the effects of logical validity of change and premise conclusion change brings improved outcome. Change theory rely on route of altering behavior which will bring a proposed improved outcome. Inductive reasoning in change theory is that goal oriented outcome is based on model of structure of interventions which in turn utilizes action-outcome contingencies (Morosoli et al 2019).
On the other hand, an inductive reasoning extracts an uncertain premise from limited specific. Conclusions are drawn from the limited data. Inductive goes from specific to general. For an example all plants go through photosynthesis, a vine is a plant therefore a vine goes through photosynthesis. An example of inductive and deductive reasoning in change theory : The opioid epidemic is creating crisis in health of the public, many health care provides are opioid naïve prescribers based on the public heath crisis caused by opioid. Deductive reasoning : The opioid epidemic has challenged the primary care profession as a result many providers have opted out of prescribing opioids. Primary care providers have determined to make a positive focused change initiatives (Carpenter et al 2021).
Carpenter, R. E., Silberman, D., Takemoto, J. K. (2021). Transforming prescription opioid practices in primary care with change theory. Health Services Insights, 14, 11786329211058283. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11786329211058283
Marei, H. F., Donkers, J., Al-Eraky, M. M., van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2017). The effectiveness of sequencing virtual patients with lectures in a deductive or inductive learning approach. Medical Teacher, 39, 1268-1274. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1372563
Morosoli, J. J., Colodro-Conde, L., Barlow, F. K., Medland, S. E. (2019). Public understanding of behavioral genetics: integrating heuristic thinking, motivated reasoning and planned social change theories for better communication strategies. Behavior Genetics, 49, 469-477. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-019-09964-9
Sample Answer 6 for DQ 1: Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is the act of developing an idea or theory and works by making specific observations and then moving toward broad speculation or generalizations (Streefkerk, 2022). This goes with watching and compiling research on observations found in the field. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, induction is assessing and inferring the plausibility of an outcome based on an action (Hayes et al., 2018).
Deductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is where a theory or idea is tested. This ideology goes from making broad speculation or generalizations to specific observations (Streefkerk, 2022). This is where an idea is tested and an outcome is determined. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, deductive reasoning is the opposite of induction in which an inference is tested and then observed (Hayes et al., 2018).
The main difference between the two is that one implies just research and knowledge whereas one requires research, knowledge, and action.
When it comes to my project, deductive reasoning is more the process of the project versus inductive. The project focuses on implementing a standardized approach toward giving patient handoff and then observing the outcomes. The goal is to determine if the standardized handoff is a better approach than the current practice in order to improve client care and safety. I am still figuring out all of the kinks in my project, but this is the gist, which falls under deductive reasoning.
References
Hayes, B. K., Stephens, R. G., Ngo, J., & Dunn, J. C. (2018). The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1333–1351. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/xlm0000527.supp (Supplemental)
Streefkerk, R. (2022). Inductive vs. deductive reasoning. Scribbr. Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/inductive-deductive-reasoning/#:~:text=The%20main%20difference%20between%20inductive,reasoning%20the%20other%20way%20around.