NRS-451V Executive Summary

Grand Canyon University NRS-451V Executive Summary-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS-451V Executive Summary assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS-451V Executive Summary

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS-451V Executive Summary depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS-451V Executive Summary

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS-451V Executive Summary is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NRS-451V Executive Summary

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS-451V Executive Summary assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS-451V Executive Summary

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS-451V Executive Summary

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS-451V Executive Summary assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NRS-451V Executive Summary

Human hands touch a lot of surfaces in the course of daily life. The premise makes them perfect vehicles in transporting germs which then gets into the body. Thorough hand washing is crucial in reducing the spread of germs. At the care facility, proper hand washing protocol must be defined to significantly control the spread of infections (Pittet, Boyce, & Allegranzi, 2017). Often, hand washing using water and soap is one of the safest ways to minimize the spread of Hospital Acquired Infection (HAI) in a hospital setting. On the contrary, not all healthcare workers have the time to conduct an effective hand washing procedure. Nonetheless, patients lack adequate information on the procedures for hand washing (Butenko, Lockwood, & McArthur, 2017). Since healthcare personnel have busy schedules and patients are in need of quality care, there is a need to introduce hand washing education for sensitization with an aim to minimize the spread of HIA.

The Purpose of the Project

At the Brooklyn Hospital Center in Brooklyn, New York, a hand washing project that targets both the health workers and patients is to be instituted. The program comes handy after the latest concerns of improper hand washing especially for hospitalized patients in the facility. The purpose of the project is to recommend a hand washing protocol that guarantees safety to workers and patients (Haverstick et al., 2017). This will be achieved through education which will take place at the hospital boardrooms for health workers and at the outpatient units or at the bedside for patients.

The Target Nurses and Patients

The initiative targets patients and healthcare workers especially nurses. Patients are the recipients of care in a health facility. Safety in quality outcomes depends on the effectiveness of hand washing protocols in a care facility. On the other hand, the project targets the nurses at the Brooklyn Hospital Center since the professionals spend the longest time with the patients and are likely to spread infection if safe hand washing procedures are not followed. Moreover, nurses need to understand the basic techniques necessary for effective hand washing not only to provide care to patients but also to educate them on proper techniques that guarantee their safety.

Benefits of the Project

The hand washing project is important to the Brooklyn Hospital Center, nurses, and patients (Pittet, Boyce & Allegranzi, 2017). To the nurses, the project aims to inform them of the basic procedures that are essential to minimize the spread of infections to their patients. Nurses will acquire knowledge on the basic techniques to identify sources of hand contamination in the hospital and how to deter the spread of such infection. Additionally, the implementation of the project will ensure that nurses limit the spread of HAIs by 30%. To the patients, hand washing projects serve to inform them about the effective procedures to ensure hand hygiene (Butenko, Lockwood, & McArthur, 2017). The project will reduce potential exposures to contaminants and germs that might cause hospital-acquired infections. In overall, the project will ensure the quality of health outcomes since the patients will only be treated for illnesses that they had been admitted for and not newly acquired infections at the care facility. This, in turn, leads to reduced length of stay in the care facility and saves the patients additional financial expenditures. To the hospital, the project will ensure that the costs of care are reduced. In general, the reputation of the hospital will be enhanced as one of the top health centers providing quality care in New York. In a study by Haverstick et al (2017), hand hygiene compliance reduces the rates of hospital-acquired infection by 75%. This means that the implementation of the program will guarantee improved quality outcomes since compliance ensures that patients and health workers do not contract or spread infections.

Budget Justification

In order to implement hand washing project at the Brooklyn Health Center, 20 missing hand rubs will be availed. Awareness training

program will be conducted to sensitize nurses on the effectiveness of hand washing. Missing sinks in the hospital wards will be installed. In total, 10 sinks will be provided to ensure patients have access to clean and safe water for hand washing. The initiative will also require the distribution of educational papers to patients and nurses. It is estimated that about 1000 handouts and brochures will be availed to ensure that participants acquire education necessary for hand washing practice (Pittet, Boyce, & Allegranzi, 2017). A handprint culture will also be procured to identify the type of germs that are predominant in the care facility. Moreover, financial resources will also be allocated for the regular monitoring of the feedback to assess the effectiveness of the project. This also involves awarding complaint nursing staff and patients to motivate other players in achieving effective hand washing technique at the facility. The overall cost of the entire projected is estimated to be $3,906 per year.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS-451V Executive Summary

Basis of Project Evaluation

In order to assess the effectiveness of the project, monitoring and evaluation will be conducted. This will be based on the frequency of patient and nurse visits to the sink as they implement hand washing (GH, 2014). The rates of hospital-acquired infections will also be recorded during the pilot project and compared with outcomes from earlier data on the same. Patients and nurses will also be asked to demonstrate hand washing procedures monthly to ascertain that the knowledge acquired is implemented effectively. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of the program will also be evaluated based on the number of refills made to the hand rub gels used by both patients and nurses.

References

Butenko, S., Lockwood, C., & McArthur, A. (2017). Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review. JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, 15(6), 1645-1670.

GH, R. (2014). Comparison of disinfectant effect of Decosept and Betadine-ethanol on hand bacterial flora. Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal, 3(3), 148-142.

Haverstick, S., Goodrich, C., Freeman, R., James, S., Kullar, R., & Ahrens, M. (2017). Patients’ hand washing and reducing hospital-acquired infection. Critical care nurse, 37(3), e1-e8.

Pittet, D., Boyce, J. M., & Allegranzi, B. (Eds.). (2017). Hand hygiene: a handbook for medical professionals (Vol. 9). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Sample Answer 2 for NRS-451V Executive Summary

There are many quality improvement initiatives in healthcare. Some of the most common ones include Six Sigma, Lean, and Total Quality Management (TQM). Six Sigma is a data-driven methodology that aims to improve the quality of products and services. It uses a set of tools and techniques to measure defects and identify ways to reduce them. Lean is a process improvement approach that aims to eliminate waste and increase efficiency. It focuses on eliminating steps or activities that do not add value to a product or service. TQM is a management philosophy that promotes the pursuit of excellence in all areas of business operations. It emphasizes continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and teamwork. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation, including target population, benefits, cost, and the basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.

Main Problem

In my healthcare settings, incomplete or illegible documentation continues to be a major problem that requires improvement. One potential solution is improved electronic medical record documentation. Incomplete physician notes are the leading cause of malpractice claims, and account for almost half of all paid malpractice claims. In my healthcare organization, incomplete or illegible documentation lead to miscommunication and errors. For example, if a doctor’s notes are incomplete or illegible, another doctor may not be able to understand them and could end up prescribing the wrong medication or performing the wrong procedure.

Solution to the Problem

Improved electronic medical record documentation is one way to help mitigate the problems caused by incomplete or illegible documentation. With accurate and complete patient information, clinicians can deliver consistent healthcare services to patients. Electronic health records (EHRs) can help improve the accuracy and completeness of patient information. EHRs can also help reduce the amount of time clinicians spend on documentation, which can free up time to provide more patient care. Improved electronic medical record documentation is a quality improvement initiative that will ensure proper and accurate information.

Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is to improve electronic medical record documentation by reducing the number of incomplete or illegible documentation. The goal of this initiative is to improve patient care by ensuring that all information pertinent to the patient’s care is documented in the electronic medical record (Fazio et al., 2020). Incomplete or illegible documentation can lead to errors in treatment, which can potentially have adverse impacts on patients. By improving electronic medical record documentation, we can ensure that all information pertinent to a patient’s care is available when it is needed most (Gandrup et al., 2020). This will help us provide the highest level of care possible for our patients.

Target Population or Audience

The target population for a quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation would be healthcare professionals who are responsible for providing patient care. This would include physicians, nurses, and other clinical staff. The goal of the initiative would be to improve the accuracy and completeness of medical records documentation (Fitzgerald et al., 2021). This would ultimately improve patient care by ensuring that all relevant information is available to healthcare professionals when making decisions about treatment plans. It would also help to ensure that patients receive appropriate care based on the most current information available.

Benefits of the Quality Improvement Initiative

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation include: A reduction in medical errors and adverse drug events, improved patient care and safety, efficient and accurate communication between providers, time savings for clinicians, and reduced costs for healthcare providers. Improved EMR can help to ensure that all members of the healthcare team have accurate and up-to-date information about a patient’s medical history, medications, and allergies. This can help to reduce the risk of medical errors, which can potentially lead to serious injury or even death. EMR also makes it easier for healthcare professionals to track patients’ progress over time and to identify any potential problems early on. This can lead to more timely and effective treatment plans, which in turn results in improved patient care.

The Cost or Budget Justification

A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that improved electronic medical record documentation, or “EHR use”, can result in significant cost savings for healthcare organizations. The study was conducted over a two-year period and found that EHR use led to a 11.8% reduction in hospital admissions and a 13.6% reduction in total hospital costs. The study also found that increased EHR use was associated with reductions in both length of stay and costs for patients who were admitted to the hospital.

The overall cost of this project will be $36,000,000 on the lower side and $49,500,000 on the higher side. The breakdown is as follows:

Cost Category for EMR Improvement	Start-up Costs per bed-low ($)	Start-up Costs per bed-high ($)
External IT Consulting	26,000	30,000
Hardware	14,000	25,000
Clinical Software Licenses	15,000	20,000
External Training Services	10,000	12,000
Other Software Licenses	5,000	7,000
Internal IT Support	2,000	5,000
Total	72,000	99,000

Total Bed Capacity	500
Grand Total	36,000,000	49,500,000

Interprofessional Collaboration Required For the Quality Improvement Initiative

Interprofessional collaboration is key for the success of any quality improvement initiative. In order to improve electronic medical record documentation, all healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s care will work together to create and implement a plan that meets the specific needs of each individual patient (Tajirian et al., 2020). There is also the need for collaboration with external organizations and partners to ensure the implementation of all the processes required. By involving all members of the healthcare team, one can ensure that everyone has a shared understanding of the patient’s care plan and are able to properly document all interventions and treatments in the EMR (Sutton et al., 2020). This improved documentation will help to improve patient care overall and ensure that all members of the healthcare team are working towards the same goal.

The Basis for Evaluating a Quality Improvement Initiative

There are a few key factors that will be considered when evaluating the quality of an electronic medical record documentation improvement initiative. First, it will be important to look at how the new system is being used by clinicians – is it making their lives easier or more difficult? If it is making their lives more difficult, then the initiative is not likely to be successful in the long run. Second, the implementation team will look at how well the system is capturing patient data (Sutton et al., 2020) and to determine whether sufficient information in the records are available to support clinical decision-making. Other question that will be asked when evaluating the quality improvement initiative will be: Are all of the necessary fields being completed, and are they populated with accurate data? If not, then there will be problems downstream when the data is analyzed for quality improvement purposes.

Conclusion

A quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation can have a number of benefits, including: improved patient care, increased efficiency and accuracy in data entry, reduced administrative costs, and enhanced overall quality of care. Anytime a change is introduced to a given process, it is important to evaluate the impact of those changes. In this case, you’re talking about introducing an electronic medical record documentation system. There are a number of factors to consider when evaluating the impact of such a change.

References

Fazio, S., Doroy, A., Da Marto, N., Taylor, S., Anderson, N., Young, H. M., & Adams, J. Y. (2020). Quantifying mobility in the ICU: Comparison of electronic health record documentation and accelerometer-based sensors to clinician-annotated video. Critical care explorations, 2(4). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188433/

Fitzgerald, M. P., Kaufman, M. C., Massey, S. L., Fridinger, S., Prelack, M., Ellis, C., … & Hagopian, S. (2021). Assessing seizure burden in pediatric epilepsy using an electronic medical record–based tool through a common data element approach. Epilepsia, 62(7), 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16934

Gandrup, J., Li, J., Izadi, Z., Gianfrancesco, M., Ellingsen, T., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2020). Three quality improvement initiatives and performance of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures in electronic health records: results from an interrupted time series study. Arthritis care & research, 72(2), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23848

Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ digital medicine, 3(1), 1-10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-0221-y

Tajirian, T., Stergiopoulos, V., Strudwick, G., Sequeira, L., Sanches, M., Kemp, J., … & Jankowicz, D. (2020). The influence of electronic health record use on physician burnout: cross-sectional survey. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(7), e19274. https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e19274/PDF

Sample Answer 3 for NRS-451V Executive Summary

Population Needs

The researcher participated in the community partnering project between his youth social support group and the Washington Area Food Bank to support food drive and supply for residents in Washington areas during the COVID 19 pandemic. The Washington Area Food Bank is an organization that collaborates with different organizations to donate and distribute food to the vulnerable. The organization explores innovative ways in which inequity in access to healthy and adequate food can be addressed in America. Earlier this year, America was adversely affected by the impacts of COVID19. The state of Washington was adversely affected by the pandemic. According to a report by Wilson (2020a), the vulnerable in the state of Washington experienced shortages in the supplies of food beginning mid-April this year. The situation was expected to worsen due to the decline in the income earned by the poor, hungry people in the state.

Besides food, the reports released by the state revealed that the citizens were also likely to experience shortage of clean water for human use. The shortage was attributed to the challenges in obtaining the carbon dioxide gas that is used in the purification of water (Wilson, 2020b). By the end of April this year, most of the food reserves in the state of Washington were on the brink of depletion, with inadequacies of donated food and volunteering workers worsening the situation (Kulish, 2020). Due to these challenges brought by COVID-19 on the residents of Washington, Washington Food Area Bank initiated drives to support food supply to the poor and vulnerable in the state. Therefore, the youth social support group that the researcher belongs to partnered with the organization to support food drive and supply it to the vulnerable populations in the state. The mission of the Washington Food Area Bank is to ensure people have access to good and healthy food. As a result, engaging in food supply drive supported this mission by ensuring constant supply of health food to the vulnerable irrespective of the challenges brought by the pandemic.

Participation

As the leader of the project, I played a number of roles in the community partnership project. The first role was case finding. First and foremost, I engaged in the identification of the vulnerable members of the society who needed food supply. The groups that were identified included the poor, elderly, homeless, and those with disabilities. Further, I played the role of disseminating information. This role entailed placing posters on strategic locations in the community to raise awareness among the community members. This was important in not only reaching to the vulnerable populations but also encouraging the members of the society to contribute to the drive.

Moreover, the leader acted as resource allocator. I determined and allocated the resources needed by the different categories of the vulnerable populations that were supplied with food. I further acted as the evaluator of the program by performing a weekly evaluation of the effectiveness of the strategies that were adopted in ensuring that the goals of the program were achieved. The last role that I played in the partnership program was acting as a health educator. I actively participated in educating the public about the importance of healthy diet. Moreover, I also educated them on the importance of adhering to the state guidelines on protecting themselves from COVID19. These roles underpinned the realization of the goals of the project by ensuring that all the vulnerable populations in the community had access to healthy and adequate food.

Resources

A number of internal and external resources were used to ensure the success of the project. According to Shirley (2020), internal resources are within an organization. The organization uses them without seeking assistance from external stakeholders. One of the internal resources that were used to ensure the success of the project was financial resources. The organization used some of its funds to purchase food that was supplied to the vulnerable in the community. The other internal resource that was utilized was experts from the organization (Shilling, 2015). This included a team of auditors, accountants, public relations officers, and healthcare workers who worked actively in assessing, planning, distributing, and evaluating the project.

External resources were also adopted for the project. One of them was money and food donations from well-wishers. The donations were used to increase the number of people who benefited from the drive. The other external resource that was used in the project was partnership from interested parties. This included our youth social support group that assisted in distributing food supplies to the vulnerable. One of the resources that lacked in the project was a team of professional counselors. The pandemic had a significant impact on the mental and emotional health and wellbeing of the affected. However, the partners involved in the program lacked professional counselors who would have provided the vulnerable with the mental and emotional support they needed. Consequently, the project did not meet these needs.

The success of the project depended largely on the leadership and interdisciplinary teams that were involved. The leaders of the project ensured active participation of all those who were involved in the process. Team members were encouraged to demonstrate commitment in the tasks they were assigned to perform for the success of the project. The members of the interdisciplinary teams also worked collaboratively in undertaking the activities of the project. They comprised of students, leaders from faith-based organizations, social workers, health workers, and staffs from the organizations. Their active collaboration was important in facilitating the success of the project.

Theory, Research, and Rationale

Democratic leadership style was adopted in the implementation of the community partnership project. According to Liebler and McConnell (2020), this is a type of participative leadership style where a focus is placed on prioritizing the inputs from the team members. The leader acknowledges the role that the members play in ensuring the success of the planned activities. The decision-making process was participative. The team leader took into consideration the various views and concerns from the members.

Democratic leadership also encourages open communication between members. The team members were encouraged to express their concerns without fear of being victimized. Two-way channels of communication were created to ensure that the team members could express their needs to the top management of the project (Borkowski & Meese, 2020). The effectiveness of democratic leadership style was evident from the ease in which decisions were made. The members were also motivated to explore innovative ways of meeting the goals of the project.

Project Evaluation

The evaluation of the project was done at its end. The evaluation process took into consideration the process and outcome measures. According to Ding and Runeson (2020), process measures of evaluation focuses on the manner in which the project was implemented. It explores the extent in which the allocated resources were utilized. It also investigates the level of stakeholder participation and any challenges that were experienced. The evaluation of the project based on this approach focused on the level of stakeholder involvement, resource use, and perceived challenges encountered by the team members.

Outcome measures on the other hand determine if the goals that were set for the project were achieved or not. A project is considered successful if its pre-developed goals and objectives were achieved (Ding & Runeson, 2020). The evaluation of the project with this approach determined the nature of realization of the developed goals. It also took into consideration the number of people who benefited from the program versus the projected number at the beginning of the project. Therefore, the use of these approaches to project evaluation provided objective data on the effectiveness of the project in achieving its outcomes.

References

Borkowski, N., & Meese, K. A. (2020). Organizational behavior in health care. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Ding, G., & Runeson, G. (2020). A ‘Triple Bottom Line’Approach to Advanced Project Evaluation. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Kulish, N. (2020). Never Seen Anything Like It: Cars Line Up for Miles at Food Banks. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/business/economy/coronavirus-food-banks.html ).

Liebler, J. G., & McConnell, C. R. (2020). Management principles for health professionals. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Shilling, D. (2015). The complete guide to human resources and the law. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Shirley, D. (2020). Project management for healthcare. CRC Press.

Wilson, J. (2020a). Revealed: food bank shortages expected to hit Washington by mid-April. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/04/washington-state-food-bank-shortages-revealed

Wilson, J. (2020b). Coronavirus-driven CO2 shortage threatens US food and water supply, officials say. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/20/carbon-dioxide-shortage-us-food-water-coronavirus