NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
The workplace is replete with various issues that require careful assessment, diagnosis and treatment. Incivility in nursing is a persistent issue that require careful management by the leadership so as to improve the workplace environment. Tools such as the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory play a fundamental role in providing the assessment results. Thus, based on the results of the Work Environment Assessment Template, the present paper will describe the above results, analyze a theory presented in a selected article, and recommend strategies that will lead to the presence of interprofessional teams within the current writer’s workplace setting.
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
The comprehensive assessment of the workplace using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory revealed a score of 70. In the analysis, only two areas of the workplace, that is, the employee satisfaction and interprofessional, scored full marks at 15. Moreover, eight areas of the tool including employee perception, celebration of employee achievements, active participation in organizational activities, fair employee treatment, effective conflict-resolution, democratic culture, competitive remunerations, and employee attraction and retention, were regarded as somewhat true (Clark, 2015). Further, employees were neutral on 6 aspects of a healthy workplace inclusive of shared vision, trust levels, effective communication, improved organizational culture, and nature of workload. However, the presence of resources for professional growth and opportunities for growth were regarded as somewhat untrue. Lastly, the employees also stated that the presence of mentoring program for employees was non-existent. Therefore, the average score for the assessment was 70.
One of the things that surprised me about the scores of the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is the score itself. I anticipated the organization to score lower than the score obtained in the assessment. The surprise in the observed scores was attributed to the weak organizational structures that have been put in place to achieve the mission and vision of the organization. The other thing that surprised me about the scores of the inventory assessment is the score that the organizational employees would highly recommend the organization as a good place to work to their friends and families. This finding was a surprise because the staff in the organization often feel that the organization does not embrace interventions that address their needs. The rate of staff turnover over the past year has been high due to lack of adequate organizational support. As a result, it is surprising that the employees are willing to recommend the organization to friends and families, yet they are not satisfied with the working conditions in the firm. One of the things that I believed prior and was confirmed in the assessment is the lack of effective systems that promote professional and personal development. Examples of the opportunities for professional and personal development that organizations can implement include coaching, mentorship, and teamwork. The assessment confirmed this since employees marked the statement on the existence of comprehensive coaching for staffs as untrue.
As noted above, the organization scored 70% in the inventory assessment. The meaning of a mildly health workplace is that the organization might support the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. However, the existing organizational structures are not effective in facilitating the realization of the desired outcomes of the quality improvement initiatives. The implication of the results is also that the leadership and management styles utilized in the organization do not have the effectiveness to drive the desired organizational success. As noted above, the meaning of the score of the organization is that the systems and structures put in place are not adequately effective in promoting the desired success. Secondly, the leadership in the organization is not effective in promoting the organizational success. However, improvements can be made on the existing structures to enhance effectiveness in organizational processes. The other implication of the score on the civility of the organization is that there are minimal rules that guide employee behaviors in the organization. The score also implies that the management and leadership of the organization have to explore interventions that can be used to improve engagement among the employees. The leadership should also focus on creating organizational culture that is characterized by a focus on safety, quality, and efficiency of services (Clark, 2018).
How healthy is your workplace?
You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.
There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Also Check Out: NURS 6053 Week 2 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
I agreed with your post Sunday, Incivility among healthcare workers can thus lead to unsafe working conditions and the safety of a patient. Care providers and organizational leaders must communicate in a way that fosters civility and empowers nurses to speak up. They must strive to create and sustain a healthy work environment where courtesy is evident. Overall, Companies should come up with a no tolerance policy for incivility in the workplace. The procedure could have a penalty resulting in every infringement, verbal caution for the initial offense, written caution for the second mistake, non-payment leave for the third one, and termination. The department of human resources should be included in the policymaking process. If incivility at the workplace is tolerated, destructive behaviors become commonplace and continue in the working environment. Each team member in a company should be educated on the right professional characters with the job code of conduct. Both staff and nurse managers must have the ability to identify it, taking it seriously, and cease the action in its ways.
References
Broome, M. E., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
Cimarolli, V. R., Bryant, N. S., Falzarano, F., & Stone, R. (2022). Factors associated with nursing home direct care professionals’ turnover intent during the covid-19 pandemic. Geriatric Nursing, 48, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.08.012Links to an external site.
Clark, C. M. (2019). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000563Links to an external site.
Also Read:
NURS 6053 Week 11 Assignment Change Implementation and Management Plan
NURS 6053 Alterations in Cellular Processes
NURS 6053 Week 5 Discussion Your Leadership Profile
Assignment: NURS 6053 Planned Change in a Department or Unit
Assignment: NURS 6053 Systems Theory
NURS 6053 Review of current Healthcare Issues
NURS 6053 Module 5 Organizational Change Essay
NURS 6053 Module 3 Leadership Essay
NURS 6053 Discussion leadership theories and behaviors
NURS 6053 Reducing the demand on primary healthcare and the strain on the healthcare system
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
Thank you for your post. Organizational leadership, especially in healthcare, is responsible for creating civil working environments. Civil work environments create safe spaces for employees and patients/families within the organization. This contributes to safe patient care by reducing medical errors, sentinel events, staffing shortages, and staff turnover compared to uncivil work environments. Educating and encouraging staff and leadership on effective communication strategies is essential. Leadership who provides an environment of collaboration, engagement, and respect is essential. Establishing a zero-tolerance policy on uncivil and bullying behavior is a must. The fact that your workplace recognizes that every nurse on different units is compensated equally shows that they value employees and the contributions that everyone makes. Each unit has unique needs that are unique compared to others, but the workload is the same.
References
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practiceLinks to an external site.. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330.
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years laterLinks to an external site.. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542.
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
A critical part of nursing leadership is promoting a healthy work environment. An assessment of the workplace based on tools like the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory allows healthcare leaders to implement measures to enhance employee performance and productivity. Nurse managers and organizational leaders should provide an environment where nurses and other healthcare workers feel comfortable and motivated to air their opinions and address concerns arising from their work activities (Peng, 2023). A healthy work environment does not imply the absence of real or perceived threats to health but should foster the physical, mental, and social wellness of the staff (Ota et al., 2022). The purpose of this paper is to discuss the results of the work environment assessment, review the literature on these areas or concepts, and suggest strategies to enhance highly efficient inter-professional teams.
| Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory | The healthy workplace inventory offers a means to understand the status of the work environment and what ails it by focusing on a host of aspects or issues. The inventory lists certain criteria like having a shared vision, sufficient communication, trust among staff and administration, engagement of employees, and addressing emerging concerns. The scores range from 20% to 100%. A score greater than 90% implies the work environment is very healthy while a less than 50% score suggests it is a very unhealthy or toxic work culture. The scores show moderately, mildly, or barely healthy work environments.
The score based on the inventory for our organization was 60%, meaning it is a mildly healthy work environment, with just a point above barely healthy. The result emanates from the current situation where nurses and other employees do not feel the organization endures its vision. Their concerns are not addressed as they feel that the planned expansion to a new state-of-the-art facility did not happen. Many are contemplating seeking new employment places and opportunities due to a decline in the team culture. The environment fails to obtain better scores based on the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory due to toxic leadership that does not understand medical aesthetics as a specialty. |
| Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also, identify one idea that you believed before conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. | Two things that surprised me were the score of 60% implying mildly healthy, and the decline in the vision that nurses and other staff had for the organization. I was surprised that it was even mildly healthy. I was surprised because six months before the assessment, the result would have been a very healthy workplace. One change in the leadership by an individual could lead to this significant shift in the organization’s culture. I reckoned that if the assessment happened again after a week, the workplace environment would get a score of barely healthy.
A healthy workplace environment is essential and allows employees to focus on organizational goals and the attainment of its vision. An idea that I believed before conducting the assessment which was confirmed is that the workplace environment was already toxic due to the leadership change and actions that the leader was taking without consulting and engaging employees. The unbiased review based on the inventory was categorical that the workplace environment was not conducive for nurses and other healthcare providers in the facility. |
| What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? | The results of the assessment are categorical that leadership change has had a significant negative effect on the work culture. The assessment shows that the health and civility of the workplace are missing and require immediate interventions to bring change and inspire nurses. Civility is the foundation for patient safety, a healthy work environment, healthy staff, and increased productivity and performance. Nurse leaders and nurses should demonstrate civilized conduct, courtesy, politeness, and a polite act or expression of views and other aspects that impact the workplace environment. Civility impacts morale and job satisfaction among employees, including nurses. These results show that a healthy workplace can enhance collaboration, and effective communication, and lead to better patient outcomes when embedded in the organizational culture. In their article, Hossny et al. (2020) show that civility influences effective collaboration between nurses and physicians to attain better patient outcomes. Ota et al. (2021) emphasize the role of nurse leadership in fostering and supporting civility in the workplace. The study suggests ways and strategies for nurses to pragmatically promote and maintain civility in healthcare settings. The implication is that the results of the assessment indicate the nurse leader has failed to promote civility in the facility because of single-handedly making decisions without engaging nurses and understanding the nature of the work environment. |
| Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. |
The selected article by Clark (2019) explores the concepts of civility and respect in nursing. Clark asserts that disrespect and uncivil workplace environment breeds harm, especially for patient safety. The article is categorical that disrespectful and uncivil behaviors in healthcare settings can lead to detrimental effects on nurses, teams, organizations, and patient safety, especially in life-threatening mistakes and even preventable complications. The article shows that incivility has significant effects on the patient care environment. The concept of incivility is essential as it implies that organizational leaders and nurses should develop evidence-based strategies to enhance and foster a culture of civility and respect. Clark (2019) observes that incivility and disrespect are associated with poor patient outcomes, dissatisfaction among employees, and increased turnover rates, as currently happening in our facility.
The concept presented in this article relates to the outcomes of the Work Environment Assessment as it demonstrates that having a healthy work environment reduces harm and fosters civility and respect among employees and management. The article shows that when a work environment is toxic, civility cannot thrive as employees and the management do not collaborate or work cooperatively to fix a problem or resolve emerging conflicts. The current work environment is uncivil and disrespects nurses and other providers (Clark et al., 2022). Therefore, the article emphasizes that nurse leadership should foster respect and engage nurses to attain increased job satisfaction, develop a positive work environment, and enhance collaboration among all stakeholders. |
| Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. | The organization can use the concepts of civility and respect for nurses to improve the current toxic environment where nurses perceive that the leadership is not responsive to their concerns. The organization should implement the evidence-based strategies as proposed by the article to improve civility and respect for nurses. The article recommends an eight-step process that allows the organization to improve civility and satisfaction among nurses. For instance, the article suggests that the first step is to raise awareness and build leadership support. The leadership should raise awareness of the positive effects of civility and educate key stakeholders about the negative impacts of incivility. The next step is assembling and empowering civility teams and ensuring they have broad-based support or recognition within the workplace. These strategies among others are essential to the organization as it can leverage them to improve employees’ welfare and patient safety. For example, the new nurse leader should engage nurses and seek their views on the proposed facility and its effects on productivity and performance. Civility and respect are essential, and the nurse leader should ensure nurses give their views and vision as depicted a few months ago before her arrival (Clark et al., 2022). She needs to understand aesthetic care as a specialty that is broad-based and not narrow since it allows individuals to have access to life-changing treatment based on their desired interventions. |
| General Notes/Comments | Work environment assessment is a critical aspect of understanding the positive aspects of an organizational culture. The assessment of our facility shows a mildly healthy environment that requires significant improvement to enhance employee motivation and attainment of organizational goals. As posited by research evidence through the articles, civility is essential and enhances organizational performance and employee satisfaction. Therefore, the facility should implement the suggested evidence-based strategies to attain civility and foster respect leading to better patient outcomes and employee satisfaction. |
References
Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering a culture of civility and respect in nursing. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(1): 44-52.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(19)30082-1
Clark, C. M., Gorton, K. L., & Bentley, A. L. (2022). Civility: A concept analysis revisited. Nursing Outlook, 70(2): 259-270.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.11.001
Hossny, E. K., & Sabra, H. E. (2021). Effect of Nurses’ perception of workplace civility climate on nurse-physician
collaboration. Nursing Open, 8(2): 620-627. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.666
Ota, M., Lam, L., Gilbert, J., & Hills, D. (2022). Nurse leadership in promoting and supporting civility in healthcare settings:
A scoping review. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(8): 4221-4233. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13883
Peng, X. (2023). Advancing Workplace Civility: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of Definitions, measurements, and
associated Factors. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1277188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188
Sample Answer 5 for NURS 6053 Week 7 Discussion Workplace Environment Assessment
The key to changing world is by listening to one another, giving each other chances to be heard can prevent chaos in the workplace and the work at large, the stress encounter in healthcare work environment could create lack of respectful way of communication. Poor communication and lack of knowledge are barrier to successful interprofessional collaboration (Broome & Marshall, 2021). our ability to cope with stress and control our emotion and talk to each other with respect hinges upon our ability to handle stress.
Description of Work Environment Assessment
My workplace scored 42 on the Clark Health Workplace Inventory, indicating that my workplace is very unhealthy. My workplace scored 4 points each under 2 statement categories “Individual and collective achievement are celebrated and publicized equitably” and “There is a comprehensible mentoring program for employees.” My workplace scored 1 point each on the statement “The workload is reasonable, manageable, and fairly distributed” and “Members of the organization use effective conflict resolution skills and address disagreements respectfully and responsibly.” My organization scored 2 points each in all other statement categories.
Members of my organization do not live by a shared vision and mission based on trust, respect, and collegiality. A shared mission and vision in an organization are critical because it helps to shed light on an organization’s direction. The actualization of shared vision hinges on its ability to form a sense of ownership among the team members in an organization. A well-embraced shared vision brings about a sense of identity that will run in the organization, and an organization that embraces a shared vision will grow.
My organization needs more trust between and among formal and other workforce members. When trust is infused in organization tasks get done with ease. Communication at all levels of the organization needs to be more transparent and direct. Effective communication is always essential to nurses (Wynn et al., 2023). Poor communication kills employee morale and engagement, resulting in poor productivity and satisfaction. Poor communication affects cooperation and collaboration among workers. In my organization, employees are not seen as assets. When a company sees employees as assets, it will nurture employee talents and help them grow. When an employee is valued, they tend to maximize their potential.
My organization needs teamwork, spirit, and collaboration. Interdisciplinary collaboration is a means of enhancing future healthcare (Broome & Marshall, 2021). There is some degree of a mentoring program for all the employees’, mentoring program is vital in the organization because it provides employees with necessary support and guidance. Mentorship promotes cohesion and collaboration in an organization. My organization does not lay emphasis on employee wellness and self-care. A good employee is a happy employee, and a happy employee results in high productivity.
My organization needs to gain the ability to continuously assess organizational culture, organization can take measures to improve organizational culture through the assessment of organizational culture. Members of my organization are not engaged in shared governance, do not engage in shared governance no joint decision-making effort or policy is being developed. At my organization workload could be more reasonable. Work needs to be fairly shared. Managing team workload is essential to prevent burnout and stress from work.
My organization has no room for free expression or opposing ideas. In my organization, there needs to be more competitive salaries and benefits. When an organization offers a competitive pay rate, it enhances overall job satisfaction and zero opportunities for promotion, although there is a certain degree of provision for career advancement. In my organization, employee turnover is very high, and my organization needs to attract or retain the best and the brightest employee. Many employees will not recommend my organization as an excellent workplace for their friends.
How Civil is My Workplace – Explanation
Civility means politeness, showing courtesy, the ability to control one’s emotions, and a respectful way of treating others. Civility at the workplace is a vital behavior an employee must exhibit in an organization; civilized behavior is interpersonal rules of engagement that dictate how people interact with each other civility is essential in the workplace. Civility is showing respect to another coworker at work. Civility at work brings about greater job satisfaction and a governable atmosphere. Civility has a relationship with improving morale and the spirit of teamwork.
When I look at my organization, there is a lack of civility and respect, resulting in a harmful environment. Lack of civility at work contributes to emotional exhaustion, sickness, burnout, and a high turnover. It causes chaos. Staffing levels and turnover negatively affect the quality of care in nursing homes (Cimarolli et al., 2022). The lack of civility at my organization serves as a basis for increased grievances. Nurses bully other nurses, causing depression and anxiety among employees. Bullying is a systematic sequence of behavior designed to erode, debase and humiliate others (Griffin & Clark, 2014). My organization cannot authoritatively say that employees are treating each other with respect, and my organization cannot say that they can effectively handle conflicts between employees. My organization cannot say they have an effective way of addressing lousy behavior among their staff.
Incivility I experienced at work
I experienced incivility when I got hired at a nursing home. Incivility among healthcare workers can create an unsafe working environment that can result in poor patient care (Clark et al., 2011). I have been bullied at work by other nurses. When I got hired, I did not know that some nurses were using the schedule/shift my organization was trying to give me as overtime. These old nurses try their best to frustrate me so that I can quit the job, and they can continue to enjoy their overtime, and the company continues to suffer high turnover and a bad image.
However, the new Director of Nursing, a transformational leader, addressed the issue and put the old nurses in order. Leadership is a position of influence, a process that takes place in a group setting, and it has to do with achieving goals that represent a shared vision (Riesch et al., 2023). In an attempt for these old nurses to sabotage my effort, they exhibited various deviant behavior with ambiguous intent to push me out of the facility. Their nefarious behavior included insulting remarks, dirty looks, and intentionally ignoring my input.
They do not want me to ask questions. However, they love querying me, telling our supervisor that they did not know my whereabouts when I just saw them a minute ago, talking to me using a condescending tone, talking about me behind me, trying to prove that they are competent at the expense of my image, accusing professional competence, displaying the silent accusation about professional competence, displaying the silent treatment. In this case, it is the old nurses that are being uncivil. Uncivil encounters in the patient environment can create uncertainty self- doubt, erode self-confidence, and affect the critical thinking ability of a nurse (Clark, 2019).
How the Incivility was Addressed
Incivility at work costs the organization plenty of resources, sometimes affecting its technical and logical problems. Bullying and incivility significantly affect employees psychologically (Alberts, 2022). At my organization, we recently had a good Director of Nursing, and she models good behavior. She did not make excuses, and she did not dismiss my concerns. She immediately agreed with my perception and believed what I said about other nurses’ attitudes. She discovered that the problem I pointed out could affect productivity and increase employee turnover. The director of Nursing held everyone accountable, and she addressed the issue. When I brought it to her notice, she called and talked to all the nurses involved without implicating me.
The director of nursing redefines acceptable conduct at work. Every time the director of nursing sees me coming to work, she always asks how I am doing and listens to my answer. The more she shows me she cares and is willing to listen to me, the more I share potential problems with her. My Director of Nursing utilizes her conflict resolution skills to address my problem. The workload at that facility was hectic, but because of the director of Nursing’s professionalism, I decide to hang on.
Conclusion
The nature of interaction among employees can influence how they discharge their responsibility and how healthcare is delivered. The code of ethic for Nurses describes vividly, the nurse’s obligation to promote safe, ethical environment and culture that encourage civility and affection, dealing with colleagues, coworkers, we encounter with civility, creating a feel free environment at work place, enables employee to speak up. Creating a civil working environment requires a shard organizational vision, values, and team norms. Developing and maintaining of high level of staff, group, and organizational civility, bring up the topic of civility at all quarters of the organization.
References
Alberts, H. L. (2022). Addressing bullying and incivility in clinical nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 17(4), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.05.004Links to an external site.
Broome, M. E., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
Cimarolli, V. R., Bryant, N. S., Falzarano, F., & Stone, R. (2022). Factors associated with nursing home direct care professionals’ turnover intent during the covid-19 pandemic. Geriatric Nursing, 48, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.08.012Links to an external site.
Clark, C. M. (2019). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000563Links to an external site.
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e31822509c4Links to an external site.
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20141122-02Links to an external site.
Riesch, S. K., Chiappa, J., Floyd, N., & Ponce, M. (2023). The chief nursing officer shared leadership model. Nurse Leader, 21(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2022.09.006Links to an external site.
Wynn, S. T., Ratcliffe, C. J., & Hardin, L. (2023). Ready, set, woo: Refining nursing students’ communication skills. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.03.004Links to an external site.Links to an external site.