coursework-banner

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Healthcare organizations have a moral and professional obligation to provide quality care to deserving patients and populations. To achieve this goal, healthcare organizations should be adequately resourced in terms of staff, materials, and finances. Workplace problems should be kept to a minimum in order to maintain optimal professional relationships. However, due to increased workplace issues, this vision of a healthy workplace is usually speculative. Many issues are so widespread that they are considered national healthcare issues or stressors. This paper examines nurse burnout as a national healthcare issue that has a negative impact on organizational outcomes, as well as effective interventions proposed in scholarly sources.

Nurse Burnout and its Effects on Organizations

The optimal output of healthcare workers is critical to achieving the desired levels of patient care. Nurse burnout is a major impediment because of the devastating effects it has on nurses’ physical, mental, and emotional health. Nurse burnout manifests itself in terms of health by a significant decrease in nurses’ energy. Emotional exhaustion, low motivation, and easily becoming frustrated are all defining characteristics (Dall’Ora et al., 2020). Leading causes include organizational culture, workplace relationships, and the effects of strain associated with patient care on nurses. Nurses cannot provide the quality of care and patient safety that is generally expected in practice unless they receive adequate support.

The consequences of nurse burnout in the workplace are significant and detrimental to interprofessional collaboration and patient care. Workplace incivility appears to be triggered by nurse burnout. According to frequent reports from progressive and summative performance reviews, about 10-20 cases of workplace violence are caused by emotional exhaustion. In the same case, 30-40% of workplace disrespect cases are associated with physically and emotionally exhausted nurses. Other minor incivility issues associated with nurse burnout include silent treatment and social exclusion. Unless appropriate measures are taken, the problem may become unmanageable as time passes. Aside from incivility, nurse burnout has been identified as a major cause of turnover. Approximately 15% of nurse turnover cases in the organization are associated with exhaustion to the point where nurses are unable to cope.

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare IssueThe effects of nurse burnout in the workplace are overwhelming and must be effectively managed. Its association with workplace

Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

incivility suggests that it poses a significant risk to healthy relationships, quality care, and nurse satisfaction. The persistence of workplace incivility, according to Dall’Ora et al. (2020), leads to job dissatisfaction and communication issues. Another issue is psychological stress, as well as a general decline in physical health. Nurse turnover, on the other hand, is difficult to manage from a management, financial, and service quality standpoint (Samad et al., 2021). It frequently prompts healthcare organizations to recruit new nurses to replace the lost workforce. Such behaviors are unsatisfying and draining. They can be avoided by ensuring that nurses are in good enough mental and physical health to carry out their routine duties.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Nurse burnout is a serious problem, according to the organization’s data, because it is multifaceted. It has a negative impact on nurses, patients, and the organization. Burnout exposes the current nursing workforce to health and relationship issues. Aside from the inevitable physical and emotional exhaustion, nurse burnout can have an impact on nurses’ attitudes toward their jobs. They are more likely to perceive it negatively and lack the intrinsic motivation required to actively participate in care processes. Such nurses are also uninterested in improving health outcomes. They are unable to use innovative strategies to improve patient outcomes, which has an impact on the overall quality of patient care and organizational output.

Review of Scholarly Sources on Nurse Burnout

Nurse burnout has piqued the interest of many nursing and healthcare researchers as a national healthcare issue. The study looked at nurse burnout from a variety of perspectives, including prevention and strategies for mitigating its effects. An article on reducing burnout among physicians and nurses by Zhang et al. (2020) is one of the useful resources in addressing nurse burnout. The article investigated how global healthcare organizations can address nurse burnout through a bundled strategy. Nurse burnout, according to Zhang et al. (2020), cannot be effectively addressed with a single strategy due to its multifaceted nature. The most effective strategy is a bundled strategy that includes individual-focused, structural or organizational interventions, and combined interventions. The study is based on the premise that nurses and management must collaborate to address burnout by addressing individual, structural, and organizational issues that cause burnout.

Another useful resource is an article on reducing nurse burnout in a UK university by Brook et al. (2021). The explanatory sequential mixed-methods study concentrated on the interventions required to reduce nurse burnout and increase nurse retention. The study’s main finding was that nurse burnout is more of a mental issue than a physical one. Because nurses’ mental health is more affected than their physical health, the most effective interventions should focus on psychological skills and cognition. Brook et al. (2021), for example, emphasized mindfulness and psychological skills training as effective strategies for nurse burnout. Combining the strategies with cognitive realignment can improve outcomes.

Summary of Proposed Interventions and Implications for Practice

Nurse burnout can be reduced in the organization by implementing the proposed interventions. Each strategy has both positive and negative consequences. Individual-focused strategies for addressing nurse burnout, according to Zhang et al. (2020), include self-care workshops, stress management skills, and mindfulness. Workload or schedule rotation adjustments, improved teamwork and support, and communication training are examples of structural or organizational interventions. Training in resilience was also suggested. The multidimensionality and comprehensiveness of the bundled interventions have the greatest positive impact. They address nurses’ emotional, mental, and physical health issues, emphasizing their high likelihood of success. However, implementing these strategies at the same time can be costly in both managerial and financial terms.

As previously proposed, when addressing nurse burnout, the mental health of nurses should be a priority. The organization should be involved in continuous performance improvement while implementing strategies that increase enjoyment and self-satisfaction. Mindfulness and psychological skill training are two examples of such strategies. On the plus side, interventions aimed at improving mental health contribute to a more contented, satisfied, and focused workforce. They play an important role in enabling nurses to understand and passionately execute their roles. In the organization, similar interventions are required. To reduce incivility and promote cohesion, a happy and satisfied workforce is required. However, focusing solely on mental health may not adequately address the issue. If the physical and emotional health needs are not met, it may lead to other problems.

Conclusion

Nurse burnout is a widespread healthcare issue that has a negative impact on nurses, patients, and organizations. It is characterized by physical and emotional exhaustion, to the point where nurses are unable to cope. Innovative and long-term solutions are required as a cause of workplace incivility and turnover in the organization. Healthcare organizations should consider a bundled strategy, as suggested in the articles. Nurse mental health interventions are also effective in addressing nurse burnout. The strategy chosen is determined by the nature of the problem, its severity, and the organization’s ability.

References

Brook, J., Aitken, L. M., MacLaren, J. A., & Salmon, D. (2021). An intervention to decrease burnout and increase retention of early career nurses: a mixed methods study of acceptability and feasibility. BMC Nursing20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00524-9

Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020). Burnout in nursing: A theoretical review. Human resources for health18, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Samad, A., Memon, S. B., & Maitlo, A. A. (2021). Workplace incivility and turnover intention among nurses of public healthcare system in Pakistan. Independent Journal of Management & Production12(5), 1394-1412. doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i5.1409

Zhang, X. J., Song, Y., Jiang, T., Ding, N., & Shi, T. Y. (2020). Interventions to reduce burnout of physicians and nurses: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicine99(26). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020992

Rubric

NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Develop a 2-3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following: · Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. · Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence/data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization or is missing. …The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or is missing.
25 pts
· Provide a summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor. · Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent
Response includes a complete, detailed, and specific summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good
Response includes an accurate summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair
Response includes a vague or inaccurate or incomplete summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

20 to >0 pts

Poor
Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or summary is missing. …The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations or explanation is missing.
30 pts
· Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. · Explain how the strategies may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Response includes a complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples for each.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Response includes an accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively with at least one specific example for each.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
Response includes a vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. …Response may include some vague or inaccurate examples.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor or summary is missing. …Response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively or explanation is missing. …Response does not include any examples.
25 pts
Resource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100