NRNP 6675 Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
Walden University Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
The introduction for the Walden University Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Personality disorders are defined as how a person’s personality constantly causes problems for themselves or others. They are characterized by chronic patterns of inner experience and inflexible behaviors, but the affected persons have no insight into the problem. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by self-image problems, unstable interpersonal relationships, feelings of emptiness, and self-mutilating behavior (Storebø et al., 2020). The purpose of this paper is to discuss controversies surrounding BPD, personal beliefs about BPD, strategies to maintain a therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations.
Controversy That Surrounds Borderline Personality Disorder
BPD has been controversial since it was identified as a diagnosis due to the stigma associated with the disorder and the therapeutic negativity held by health providers who encounter patients with the disorder in acute settings. Clinical controversies have previously cropped up about whether BDP is a legitimate diagnosis, leading to some insurance companies refusing to acknowledge BPD treatment for reimbursement matters (Choudhary & Gupta, 2020). In addition, some practitioners have raised controversies about the theories used in developing BPD. Consequently, many health providers do not regard BPD as a genuine diagnosis and consider it self-induced or chosen. This has led to numerous cases of mental health practitioners declining to treat BPD patients (Campbell et al., 2020). Furthermore, many mental health practitioners believe that individuals with BPD use a disproportionate portion of mental health services and that the disorder is not compliant with treatment even with contrary evidence.
Professional Beliefs about Borderline Personality Disorder
I believe that BPD is a real diagnosis, and mental health practitioners should be keen to identify patients with odd
and eccentric personalities. Campbell et al. (2020) assert that diagnosis is vital in identifying the appropriate treatment for individuals with symptoms suggesting BPD. I also believe that BPD can be identified by looking at the culture and social norms, which help to distinguish normal from abnormal patterns. According to Choudhary and Gupta (2020), culture and social norms are the two vital factors that distinguish between normal and abnormal behavioral patterns in BPD. The social norms influence and drive a person’s interpersonal functioning, and emotions are experienced and expressed within the cultural context.
Furthermore, I believe that BPD becomes evident in adolescence and early adulthood. Thus, practitioners should be observant of problems in personality in this population. Bozzatello et al. (2021) explain that, similar to all PDs, BPD emerges during adolescence or young adulthood. Thus, it is crucial to detect the presence of BPD in its early stages to initiate treatment and improve its prognosis.
Strategies for Maintaining the Therapeutic Relationship with a Client with BPD
A positive therapeutic relationship is extensively acknowledged as a crucial factor that promotes the effectiveness of clinical outcomes in treating patients with BPD. However, a positive therapeutic relationship is usually slow to develop, challenging to maintain, and inconsistent (Flora, 2018). The provider can maintain a positive therapeutic relationship by cultivating emotional awareness since the patient’s or the provider’s emotional sensitivity, and reactivity can hinder the therapeutic process. Therapists who often strain with moderating their intense reactions should seek to recognize and accept their emotional experiences.
The therapist should be responsive by tailoring interventions to a patient’s characteristics and behaviors. Furthermore, the provider’s attitude, communication style, and intent are crucial to creating an effective therapeutic relationship. Empathic validation is another o important strategy for maintaining the therapeutic relationship (Flora, 2018). Patients with BPD are emotionally sensitive to actual or perceived rejection or criticism, which hinders effective therapeutic relationships. Lastly, the therapist should avoid being authoritative or controlling when handling BPD clients (Flora, 2018). They should rather be highly collaborative and treat the patient as capable, competent, and an active participant in therapy.
Ethical and Legal Considerations Related To BPD
BPD patients have high rates of discontentment due to unmet needs, like access to services and adequate treatments, which lead to ethical issues. Patients’ right to autonomy should be upheld by educating individuals with BPD about their diagnosis and available treatment options to alleviate them. Campbell et al. (2020) found that individuals with BPD are not told about their diagnosis or are informed they have a different condition, such as bipolar disorder, which compromises the principle of veracity. Furthermore, beneficence and nonmaleficence should be considered through correct diagnosis and treatment interventions. Correct diagnosis is crucial to ensure patients receive the appropriate treatment (Storebø et al., 2020). It is undoubtedly evident that errors in diagnosis or failure to tell patients of their BPD diagnosis can cause significant preventable harm.
Conclusion
Controversies surrounding BPD on whether it is legitimate have led to some practitioners declining to offer treatment and insurers failing to compensate. The correct diagnosis of BPD alleviates possible harm, which may occur from inadequate treatment or treatment linked with marked iatrogenic harms. All therapy approaches for BPD stress the significance of the therapeutic relationship. Strategies to maintain a therapeutic relationship with BPD clients include cultivating emotional awareness, being responsive, having a positive attitude and communication style, and empathic validation.
References
Bozzatello, P., Garbarini, C., Rocca, P., & Bellino, S. (2021). Borderline Personality Disorder: Risk Factors and Early Detection. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 11(11), 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112142
Campbell, K., Clarke, K., Massey, D., & Lakeman, R. (2020). Borderline Personality Disorder: To diagnose or not to diagnose? That is the question. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. doi:10.1111/inm.12737
Choudhary, S., & Gupta, R. (2020). Culture and borderline personality disorder in India. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 714.
Flora, K. (2018). The therapeutic relationship in Borderline kPersonality Disorder: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 18(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2018.2.12
Storebø, O. J., Stoffers-Winterling, J. M., Völlm, B. A., Kongerslev, M. T., Mattivi, J. T., Jørgensen, M. S., Faltinsen, E., Todorovac, A., Sales, C. P., Callesen, H. E., Lieb, K., & Simonsen, E. (2020). Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 5(5), CD012955. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2