Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
Walden University Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
The introduction for the Walden University Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Assignment Human Case Study Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
As an advanced practice nurse, you will likely observe patients who experience neurological conditions. While patients with neurological conditions may present typical physical manifestations, such as headaches, dizziness, weakness, and fatigue, many manifestations may not be overtly physical, such as declining memory and social withdrawal. In all cases, your differential diagnosis must take into consideration the role of the patient history and physical examination.
Photo Credit: [Science Photo Library – SCIEPRO]/[Brand X Pictures]/Getty Images
For this Case Study Assignment, you will analyze an i-Human simulation case study about an adult patient with a neurologic condition. Based on the patient’s information, you will formulate a differential diagnosis, evaluate treatment options, and create an appropriate treatment plan for the patient.
To prepare:
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients with neurologic conditions.
Access i-Human from this week’s Learning Resources and review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
Identify three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with neurologic conditions.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Assignment: Human Case Study: Evaluating and Managing Neurologic Conditions
Assignment
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human platform.
By Day 7
Complete your Assignment in i-Human.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 10 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 10 Assignment
Knowledge Check: Module 4: Musculoskeletal, Neurologic, and Mental Health Conditions
In this exercise, you will complete a 10-question Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content. Please note that this is a formative practice to help you better prepare for your Final Exam as well as your NP certification exam.
The questions in this Knowledge Check are related to the topics from Weeks 9 and 10. Topics include:
Musculoskeletal conditions
Neurologic conditions
It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability.
Photo Credit: [triloks]/[E+]/Getty Images
By Day 7
Complete and submit your Knowledge Check.
Submission Information
Submit Your Knowledge Check by Day 7
To submit your Knowledge Check:
Week 10 Knowledge Check
What’s Coming Up in Week 11?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In Week 11, you will not participate in a Discussion or complete an Assignment; however, you will take a Comprehensive Final Exam. Your Comprehensive Final Exam covers all of the topics and resources found in Weeks 1–11. Review the topics for these weeks as you prepare and plan your time accordingly for your Final Exam.
To go to the next week:
Week 11
NRNP_6531_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Novice Competent Proficient
HPI statement
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.
History
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Incomplete history missing 3 or more aspects of the OLDCARDS critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Fairly complete history covering most of the requirements but may be missing 1-2 aspects of OLDCARDS critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Complete history covering all critical components of a focus exam. Includes all aspects of OLDCARDS
Physical Exam
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Incomplete physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Fairly complete physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Complete physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam.
Testing
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests. May include contraindicated testing.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 8 (8%)
Tests ordered are generally apprropriate. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.
Differential Diagnosis Summary
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Primary diagnosis may be wrong.Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components.
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 14 (14%)
Correct primary diagnosis identified. Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Priority list may be out of order
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 20 (20%)
Primary diagnosis identified. Clearly written differential diagnoses.
Plan for patient
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 25 (25%)
Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.
Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.
Exercises
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical questions.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical questions.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (5%)
Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions.
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6531_Week10_Assignment_Rubric