Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
Walden University Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
The introduction for the Walden University Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 8310 Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
Discussion 1: Epidemiology in the News: Randomized Trials
Throughout the course of this discussion board a summarization of a research study addressing the purpose, study population, length of the trial, data collection methods, outcome measures, results and conclusion, and ethical issues associated with the study. In this posting, a link to the article selected will be provided. Last, the identification and a discussion of the ethical issues associated with this study.
Cognizant of the role that training plays when it comes to improving a nurse’s competencies in EBP and thus empowering them to contribute to the development of EBP, here are certain strategies that can be undertaken from both an organizational level, to the larger professional level. At the organizational level, the organization can organize for opportunities where their nurses can get trained on evidence based practice. On the greater professional levels, professional bodies such as the ANA and the ANCC have developed certification program for nurses. By including components of evidence based practice in the certification exams, this ensures that nurses will prepare and apprise themselves on EBP and thus, in order to earn the certification, they will have to be competent in EBP. Alternatively, the institutions can include a whole different certification for EBP, where nurses will specifically be trained on EBP, tested on the same and thus, their competency will be proven by their certification. This will ultimately improve their ability to participate in the development and implementation of EBP.
A research design article that has been selected for the purpose of this discussion board post is “Omicron Hospitalization Risk 80 Percent Less Than Delta—South Africa Study” written by Jack Dutton which was featured in Newsweek magazine. The purpose of the study was to discuss the severity of the exposure of the Omicron variant within the South African community. The population of the study was of the thousands of exposed South African people both vaccinated and unvaccinated as well as the severity of their symptoms with the Omicron variant versus the Delta variant. The length of the trial consisted with a start date in November 2021 to the present. The data collection methods that had been used was with those who had tested positive with PCR tests as well as with antibody surveys. These outcome measures revealed that, according to antibody surveys, between 60 and 70 percent of people in the African country may have been infected by COVID previously (Dutton, 2021). The outcome measures were also not reliable. But the authors recognized several limitations to the study, including the number of Omicron infections being underestimated and biased towards geographic regions where the type of PCR test they used to detect the new variant was more commonly used (Dutton, 2021). In the end the results were not reliable in the end with conflicting data. Our finding of no difference in severity in SGTF [Omicron] compared to non-SGTF infected individuals in the same time period, and the lower risk of severity in SGTF compared to earlier Delta infected individuals, suggests that this reduced severity may be in part a result of high levels of population immunity (due to natural infection and/or vaccination),” the paper said (Dutton, 2021). In the conclusion of the article the study had seen an increase in Omicron cases within the South African population. The study did reveal that those who were affected had a prior infection and had presented with less severe symptoms compared to those symptoms with the Delta variant. Per the study the current variant has now peaked and the cases of infection as well as death toll have started to decrease. Ethical issues with the article include multiple issues. The most significant concern is the data is not backed up or sited with contributing sources. The article is always opinion based mainly versus scientific based as the majority. There are again, many examples of studies that were done where the investigators influenced the outcome of the study by either conscious, or sometimes unconscious selection of controls in cases (Laureate Education (Producer), 2012). In these cases of the study, the author needs to be able to verify their facts with the appropriate data. The study would have benefitted from a cross-sectional study that was able to have comparative data to be able to have more validity with their results.
The following link is the direct link to be able to read and analyze the study in Newsweek magazine.
Omicron Hospitalization Risk 80 Percent Less Than Delta—South Africa Study (newsweek.com)
References
Dutton, J. (2021, December 22). Omicron Hospitalization Risk 80 Percent Less Than Delta—South Africa Study. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/omicron-hospitalization-risk-80-percent-less-delta-south-africa-study-1662181
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Epidemiology and population health: Experimental studies [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.