Discussion: Non-Causal Designs

Discussion: Non-Causal Designs

Discussion: Non-Causal Designs

Question Description

Prepare a written analysis based on the article by Beauvais, Steward, DeNisco, and Beauvais (2014) that addresses the following:

Determine the general advantages and disadvantages of correlational designs. Determine the study’s strengths and weaknesses based on your findings.
Explain when a correlational design is most useful in an educational setting and whether this is an appropriate use of a correlational design in this study. Explain why, and if not, suggest a more precise research design.
Identify and explain the types of problems that correlational designs are best suited to solving. Determine whether a correlational design is the best way to address the problem in this study.
Review the study’s research question, and then provide a sample research question corresponding to a different hypothetical correlational design.
At the very least, use this scholarly resource to back up your assignment. Other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included in addition to these specified resources.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion: Non-Causal Designs

5-7 pages (excluding title and reference pages)

You should proofread your paper. However, do not rely solely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so

Discussion Non-Causal Designs
Discussion Non-Causal Designs

indicates a lack of effort on your part, and your grade will suffer as a result. Papers with a high number of misspelled words and grammatical errors will be penalized. Before submitting your paper, go over it in silence and then aloud, and make any necessary changes. It is often beneficial to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Uncorrected mistakes are preferable to handwritten corrections.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point typeface (10 to 12 characters per inch). Smaller or compressed type, as well as papers with narrow margins or single spacing, are difficult to read. It is preferable to allow your essay to exceed the recommended number of pages rather than attempting to compress it into fewer pages.

Large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are also unacceptable, waste trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced, and have a one-inch margin on all four sides of each page. When submitting hard copies, use white paper and print with dark ink. It will be difficult to follow your argument if it is difficult to read your essay.