Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

Walden University Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

The introduction for the Walden University Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

After the introduction, move into the main part of the Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

NURS 8302 Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

Health care is evolving and respectfully requires improvement while providing quality services. When errors happen in patient care, it leads to patient safety events. Medication errors are increasing around the globe and becoming a major concern in facilities. Although medication is a preventable error, it can threaten the health of patients and lead to economic losses (Kang et al. (2019). “To collect a safety patient event and to analyze a root cause of patient safety event, reporting systems have been implemented in healthcare settings and patient safety organizations (Kang et al. (2019).”

Furthermore, fast track drug approval is also a medication problem and has grown in the past years coupled with the increasingly complex drug molecules and therapy regimens such as the use of biologics and other sensitive medications, drug-related complications are on the rise and require more than usual attention from all healthcare professionals (Alzahrani et al. (2021). Prescribing errors (PEs) is an alarming concern that is related to fast-track medication is leading a major medication safety issue (Alzahrani et al. (2021). Prescribing errors, a major medication safety issue, are a common cause of morbidity and mortality, both in community practice and in hospitals (Alzahrani et al. (2021). Medication errors is serious because of the possibility of an adverse events can leading to a devastating outcome. In my organization a medication error would elevate to administration, who would conduct a meeting with quality and began a root cause analysis.

References

Alzahrani, A. A., & Alwhalbi, M. M., & Asin, Y. A., & Kamal, K. M., & Alhawassi, T. M.

(2021). Description of pharmacists’ reported interventions to prevent prescribing errors among in hospital patients: a cross sectional retrospective study. Health Services Research, 21; 432. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-06418-z

Yoa, B., Kang, H., & Gong, Y. (2019). Data quality assessment of narrative medication error

reports. doi:10.3233/SHT1190146.

RE: Quality improvement initiative

Collapse

Br…, thank you for your response. As distant as it may seem prescribing error is still a problem in some hospitals. Many interventions are in place to decrease these errors tremendously, although it still too many. Prescribing errors (PEs)is a major medication safety

issue, are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in both the community and the hospital. (Alzahrani et al., 2021). Additionally, in hospitals almost 6.5% of mortality and morbidity incidents that are connected to PEs, although over half of these errors are preventable. Alzahrani et al. (2021), defines PEs as “a clinically meaningful prescribing error that occurs as a result of a prescribing decision or the prescription writing process resulting in an unintentional significant reduction in the probability of treatment being timely and effective or in increasing risk of harm when compared to generally accepted practice.” Furthermore, the high frequency of PEs in hospitals can also be attributed to hospital systems such as, inadequate training for medical staff, excessive workload or secondary to patient related factors, such as giving poor care to a patient. Multiple personnel are likely to be involved in medication events, such as physicians, pharmacists, nurses, which can complicate reporting the event (Yao et al., 2019).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

References

Alzahrani, A. A., & Alwhalbi, M. M., & Asin, Y. A., & Kamal, K. M., & Alhawassi, T. M.

Yoa, B., Kang, H., & Gong, Y. (2019). Data quality assessment of narrative medication error

reports. doi:10.3233/SHT1190146.

Quality Improvement Initiative

Collapse

Discussion: Quality Improvement Initiative

Post a brief explanation of the QI initiative you selected, and why. Be specific.

First case start times are imperative to patient safety and hospital financial stability. The bottom line of first case start delays are effective communication between the various members of the care team (Jacobs & Duncan, 2009). Delays in treatment secondary to ineffective communication led to adverse events that disrupt departmental integrity, cohesion and patient safety. Clearly defined role expectations of the various parties involved in the patient care are the first step towards effective communication that facilitates efficient first case start times (Fezza & Palermo, 2011).

Explain how adverse events are handled in your healthcare organization or nursing practice, including an explanation of how this may impact both public and internal perspectives on healthcare quality.

Public access to national reporting databases that show how hospitals compare to one another in how they manage care pathways affords provides a depth of consumer awareness never seen before in the medical and nursing world. Patients have a right to know how well organizations faire on reaching benchmarks associated with treatment options and can choose whether to proceed with receiving care at these facilities. It is important that nurses and doctors keep this at the forefront of their personal practice models as well as incorporate this into organizational standards of practice. Reporting of adverse events that are later made public by governing agencies such as the Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). These two agencies provide data that can be used to compare mortality rates of GI hemorrhage between facilities and states. This organization collects disease condition and treatment data from a variety of care settings to generate information that can be shared nationwide and displayed for the public and private entities through the State Inpatient Database (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2016).

At Mount Siani West, the adverse event reporting system in use is called SafetyNet. This documentation system allows all personnel to report adverse events and near misses under anonymity. Events ranging from IV infiltration and falls to medication errors are entered into this reporting system and later evaluated by management. This is an internal process of reviewing system errors that have the potential of causing adverse events in patient care. It is a non-punitive process that leads to investigating gaps in care or practice that are later corrected at an administrative level.

Briefly describe the error rate from the article you selected, and explain how this may relate to your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.

The domino effect in healthcare caused by the over prescription of opioids is an example of a national patient safety issue secondary to a gross error whose implications are still felt throughout the medical community. Patient safety surrounding the number, frequency, and dosing of opioids by some practitioners demonstrates a gross medical error that has lasting deadly effects for patients, their families and communities. Nursing errors associated with inappropriate and inaccurate pain assessment and management are an example of an error that proved to be detrimental to patient safety associated with narcotic use and prescription (Higgins & Herpy, 2021). Although no one could have predicted the depth and extent of the global opioid pandemic, the errors associated with not fully appreciating the root causes of patient’s pain and appropriate collaborative management strategies lead to an international crisis. Healthcare organizations and nursing practice have subsequentially placed more emphasis on accurately assessing pain, its frequency and duration on an individual basis while no long relying on opioids as a primary strategy (Higgins & Herpy, 2021). Incorporating organizational success at applying this strategy to pain management is a quality improvement tactic employed in various departments under pain management and assessment.

Reference:

Fezza, M., & Palermo, G. B. (2011). Simple Solutions for Reducing First-Procedure Delays. AORN Journal, 93(4), 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2010.11.029

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. (2016). Statistical Brief #65. Www.hcup-Us.ahrq.gov. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb65.jsp

Higgins, M. C. S. S., & Herpy, J. P. (2021). Medical Error, Adverse Events, and Complications in Interventional Radiology: Liability or Opportunity? Radiology, 298(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020202341

Jacobs, B., & Duncan, J. R. (2009). Improving Quality and Patient Safety by Minimizing Unnecessary Variation. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 20(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.031