HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
Process of Care Paper
Access the Hospital Compare website (.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/”>www.Hospitalcompare.hhs.gov) and select a local hospital. Look at the hospital’s publically reported indicators for Process of Care.
Write a paper of 1,000-1,200 words that analyzes how the selected hospital performs on these indicators versus two of its competitors. Include your thoughts on the pros and cons of publically reporting these data sets.
Refer to the website and incorporate specific examples and details into your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for
successful completion of the assignment
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Sample Answer for HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
Healthcare facilities have the mandate of meeting the healthcare needs of residents. The regulatory bodies have instituted quality measures for evaluating the performance of such facilities. The standards govern practice parameters and stipulated guidelines. In the United States, hospital performance is evaluated using process-based criteria outlined by the Joint Commission and The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (Metcalfe et al., 2018). The evaluation outcomes are in turn used by the healthcare insurance companies to establish reimbursement schemes. Notably, the Hospital Compare Website avails the performance index of different healthcare facilities. The analyses focus on the quality indicators (QI). In this regard, the public gets the privilege of choosing high-quality providers. This paper presents a comparative analysis of Desert Valley Hospital process-based performance and its two competitors. The paper also highlights the pros and cons associated with availing publically hospitals’ indicators for the process of care.
Comparison
Fundamentally, Desert Valley is an acute care hospital based in the State of California. The facility provides emergency services and has an operational integrated system for receiving laboratory results electronically. The two rivals for the Desert Valley include Palmdale Regional Medical Center and Barstow Community Hospital. Both Palmdale and Barstow are also situated in California State. However, Palmdale and Barstow have currently rated two stars while Desert valley enjoys a three-star rating (Medicare.gov, 2020). Additionally, all three hospices specialize in providing acute care services to the patients. Despite the similarity of service delivery, there are outstanding dissimilarities in terms of process-based performance.
The differences in the performance of the hospitals are evident in the patients’ experience survey findings. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey report indicates that nurse communication efficiency at Desert Valley stands at 75 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). On the contrary, the nurses’ communication efficiency score for Palmdale is 77 percent while that of Barstow stands at 75 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). Similarly, 73 percent of the surveyed patients admitted to having communicated effectively with Desert Valley doctors. On the other hand, the patient-doctor communication proficiencies for Palmdale were 73% while Barstow reported the highest, 78 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). Moreover, a patient support is another facet of quality care. For this parameter, Desert Valley attained 64 percent whereas Palmdale and Barstow had 68 and 63 percent respectively (Medicare.gov, 2020). In terms of prescription advice, 60 percent of the Desert Valley patients receive prescription advice. On the other hand, Barstow had a prescription assistance score of 57 percent while Palmdale reported 60% (Medicare.gov, 2020).
Furthermore, the cleanliness levels of a healthcare facility is another crucial QI parameter. Desert Valley and Palmdale had the same room cleanliness score, 74 percent. However, Barstow reported a room cleanliness level of 68 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). Nevertheless, Desert Valley has the lowest noise levels, 52 percent, facilitating the faster recovery of patients. Contrariwise both Barstow and Palmdale reported similar noise levels rated at 62 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). In terms of patient education, Desert Valley management achieved a percentage score of 82. However, Barstow has the best patient education program with a score of 86 percent followed by Palmdale with 83 points (Medicare.gov, 2020). Additionally, in terms of patient recommendations, the three hospitals had different scores. Palmdale had the highest recommendation rate of 75 percent while Desert Valley and Barstow had a recommendation score of 67 and 55 percent respectively (Medicare.gov, 2020).
Effective and timely care is another parameter for ranking healthcare facilities. Essentially, patients prefer getting services in healthcare institutions that have prompt response strategies. Desert Valley offers the best sepsis care indicated by 82 percent. The facility is followed by Barstow with 67% while Palmdale has a sepsis care score of 61 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020). Desert Valley also offers effective emergency care for the patients. Fundamentally, the hospital gives patients admitted in this unit more time, 312 minutes compared to 282 and 136 minutes for Palmdale and Barstow hospital respectively (Medicare.gov, 2020). The facet indicates that Desert Valley has a well-equipped emergency unit with adequate medical personnel. Notably, hospices have different rates of preventive care. The preventive care unit ensures that patients get healthy lifestyle advice, screenings, and immunizations for preventable diseases. Barstow has the highest preventive care score, 84 percent, followed by Desert valley, 79 percent, while Palmdale comes last with 67 percent (Medicare.gov, 2020).
Pros and Cons of Publically Reporting These Data Sets
Essentially, patients often seek medical services in high-quality healthcare institutions. The process-based performance findings reveal the quality status of various hospitals. According to Vukovic et al. (2017) publically reporting of hospital data fastens patient decision making. In essence, patients go for the facility with the highest-ranking to get the best. Additionally, Metcalfe et al. (2018) reasoned that public reporting enables hospital management to improve their service delivery mechanisms. The feedbacks associated with the reports enables the management to ascertain the position and reputation of their facilities. Consequently, robust improvement measures are then enforced by top officials (Prang, Canaway, Bismark, Dunt, & Kelaher, 2018). Furthermore, public reporting simplifies the government planning process. The data enables healthcare departments to strategize effectively on the ideal techniques for positive outcomes (Albahri et al., 2018). Therefore, public reporting acts as the foundation for enhancing quality indicators in various healthcare facilities.
Public reporting is also associated with negative consequences. According to Albahri et al. (2018), the reports significantly reduce healthcare quality. The providers usually criticize such findings as they argue that the reports are highly manipulated. As a result, providers fail to admit low-risk as well as patients in critical conditions due to the objective of enhancing their performance metrics (Vukovic et al., 2017). Besides, highly-ranked facilities have the intention of enjoying more benefits from the stakeholders. Additionally, other crucial clinical areas always suffer financial setbacks. The providers channel more funds to improve on the publically ranked departments while ignoring other clinical units (Metcalfe et al., 2018). Prang et al. (2018) argued that public reporting reduces the quality of care through misidentification of the exact performance index of healthcare providers (Metcalfe et al., 2018). The statistical disparities incurred during the evaluation process trigger patient migration from performing facilities to low-performing providers. As a result, the movement further worsens the quality of care in such institutions.
Conclusion
In summary, the periodic evaluation of quality standards of healthcare facilities plays a crucial role in improving standards of care. The CMS facilitates an effective comparison of quality standards of hospitals in the United States. Notably, hospices with high ranking index are associated with a greater score in the quality indicators as in the case of Desert Valley Hospital. However, public reporting has several pros and cons that in turn affect the actual quality of care. Therefore, the survey analysts need to capture exact parameters to avoid the production of misleading reports. Moreover, providers need to streamline care processes to improve patient safety and efficiency.
References
Albahri, O. S., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Hashim, M., Albahri, A. S., & Alsalem, M. A. (2018). Real-time remote health-monitoring Systems in a Medical Centre: A review of the provision of healthcare services-based body sensor information, open challenges, and methodological aspects. Journal of medical systems, 42(9), 164.
Medicare.gov. (2020). Compare Hospitals. Retrieved from https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/compare.html#cmprTab=6&cmprID=050204%2C050709%2C050298&cmprDist=48.3%2C73.0%2C71.5&dist=100&loc=CALIFORNIA%20CITY%2C%20CA&lat=35.125801&lng=-117.9859038
Metcalfe, D., Diaz, A. J. R., Olufajo, O. A., Massa, M. S., Ketelaar, N. A., Flottorp, S. A., & Perry, D. C. (2018). Impact of public release of performance data on the behaviour of healthcare consumers and providers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9).
Prang, K. H., Canaway, R., Bismark, M., Dunt, D., & Kelaher, M. (2018). The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours. BMC family practice, 19(1), 29.
Vukovic, V., Parente, P., Campanella, P., Sulejmani, A., Ricciardi, W., & Specchia, M. L. (2017). Does public reporting influence quality, patient and provider’s perspective, market share and disparities? A review. The European Journal of Public Health, 27(6), 972-978.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 675 Discussion indicators for Process of Care
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.