Imagine the following scenario: You are taking the evidence-based practice course and one of your classmates shares an EBP project draft with you.

Discussion

If a classmate cites sources incorrectly or fails to cite, I would enlighten them on plagiarism. I would inform them that plagiarism involves taking words, ideas, or information from other authors and presenting them as your own (Khadilkar, 2018). I would tell that when you use others’ work and ideas, it is essential to clearly and correctly cite the ideas to show that it is not one’s original work. Citations demonstrate that the student has conducted appropriate research work and that they have consulted appropriate texts for the assignment or study (Gasparyan et al., 2017). Besides, I would inform my classmate that failure to cite others’ ideas means that one claims that the whole paper and all of its information is theirs. I would advise the classmate to cite correctly the sources used for the EBP project draft to avoid plagiarism.

Plagiarism reflects negatively on the credibility and integrity of the individual, university, and profession. It tarnishes the reputation of the student, institution, and profession (Khadilkar, 2018). Plagiarism allegations can result in a student being suspended or expelled. The student’s academic record can reflect the ethics offense, resulting in one being barred from enrolling in another university (Gasparyan et al., 2017). Besides, the damage on credibility and integrity from plagiarism can follow the individual for their entire career.

The academic institution is a primary victim of plagiarism since its reputation is often damaged. The institution’s or university’s credibility and public image get damaged when plagiarism cases are exposed, harming all academic stakeholders (Gasparyan et al., 2017). In addition, plagiarism damages the profession’s reputation since it discredits the entire profession (Khadilkar, 2018). As a result, plagiarism scandals affect even those not guilty, resulting in questions about the profession’s integrity.

References

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies. Journal of Korean medical science, 32(8), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220

Khadilkar, S. S. (2018). The plague of plagiarism: prevention and cure! https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1182-9

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Imagine the following scenario: You are taking the evidence-based practice course and one of your classmates shares an EBP project draft with you.

Part 1

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CA-UTIs) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections in the USA. CAUTIs can result in more adverse complications such as sepsis and endocarditis, and even death. According to Gomila et al. (2019), CA-UTIs account for more than 1 million cases annually in the US. They also account for more than 80% of UTIs originating in the healthcare setting. They are the most common causes of bacteremia in long-term care facilities and infection in patients with spinal cord injury. About 20% of hospitalized patients have a urinary catheter during admission, which increases the risk of CA-UTI by 3–7% daily (Gomila et al., 2019). The major risk factor for UTIs in hospital settings is the temporary insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. CA-UTI develops due to the inoculation of microbes into the bladder by the urethral catheter, providing an environment for bacterial adhesion and causing mucosal irritation. The bacteria enter the bladder during insertion or manipulation of the catheter, the drainage system, and after removal.

CA-UTI is my topic of interest since it causes a significant burden on patients in terms of morbidity and mortality. In addition to the apparent harm posed to patients, governmental pressure has made hospitals across the country put more effort into reducing incidences of CA-UTI. According to Letica-Kriegel et al. (2019), CAUTI rates are included in both government quality ratings through the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare quality star ratings and financial penalties through the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Penalty program. CA-UTI is relevant to advance nursing practice since advanced practice nurses (APRNs) have a responsibility of promoting better patient outcomes and improving patient safety by applying evidence-based research in clinical practice (Gomila et al., 2019). Nurses are the primary healthcare providers responsible for inserting and maintaining urinary catheters and promoting the desired outcomes. Consequently, they should have adequate knowledge about infection control in the use of urethral catheters, and their practice must adhere to healthcare setting’s guidelines on infection control (Gomila et al., 2019). Besides, PRNs are responsible for obtaining appropriate knowledge and practices of catheter care to prevent UTIs.

What is your personal worldview?

Topic 4 Assignment: Nursing Theory

Worldview and Nursing Process Personal Statement

Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research

Discuss how the shift to value-based health care has impacted delivery of care and the role and responsibilities of the advanced registered nurse.

Differentiate between “leading” and “managing.”

Discuss the importance of interoperability between EHRs and other disparate systems and the impact on improving quality and access to care

Emerging Technology Brief

Part II: In the table below, describe the population and the intervention. (You will continue drafting the PICOT, completing the shaded areas in Topic 3.)

PICOT Question
P	Population	Hospitalized adult patients. The population of interest is hospitalized adult patients because15–25% of hospitalized patients are catheterized at some point during their hospital stay. Catheter use is associated with most nosocomial UTIs. Patients with the highest risk of CA-UTI include those with extended periods of catheterization, errors in catheter care, microbe colonization of the drainage bag, catheterization late in the hospital course, and lack of antimicrobial therapy (Gomila et al., 2019). In addition, females, diabetic patients, patients with diarrhea, renal insufficiency, and immunocompromised state have a high risk of developing CA-UTI.
I	Intervention	Meatal cleaning with using 0.1% chlorhexidine solution before urinary catheterization. The most effective way of reducing incidences of CA-UTI is reducing catheter use. Nonetheless, catheter use is unavoidable in some patients since it is part of disease management. The proposed intervention is to clean and disinfect the external urethral orifice using 0.1% chlorhexidine solution before urinary catheterization. According to Fasugba et al. (2019), cleaning and disinfecting the urethral meatus before inserting the urinary catheter is considered a potential solution to lowering the incidence of CA-UTI in patients. The intervention seeks to decrease bacterial colonization around the meatal area, preventing the introduction of opportunistic bacteria into the urinary tract during catheterization (Fasugba et al., 2019). Fasugba et al. (2019) conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of 0·1% chlorhexidine solution for meatal cleaning before insertion of a urinary catheter in reducing the prevalence of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria and UTI. The study showed that using 0.1% chlorhexidine solution led to a 74% decrease in catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria and a 94% reduction in the incidence of catheter-associated UTI. The study supports using chlorhexidine solution for meatal cleaning before insertion of catheter because it reduces catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria and UTI and improves patient safety.
C	Comparison
O	Outcome
T	Timeframe
PICOT
Problem Statement

References

Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., Gardner, A., & Mitchell, B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19(6), 611-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30736-9

Gomila, A., Carratalà, J., Eliakim-Raz, N., Shaw, E., Tebé, C., Wolkewitz, M., … & Pujol, M. (2019). Clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection in countries with a high rate of multidrug-resistance: the COMBACTE-MAGNET RESCUING study. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 8(1), 1-8.

Letica-Kriegel, A. S., Salmasian, H., Vawdrey, D. K., Youngerman, B. E., Green, R. A., Furuya, E. Y., Calfee, D. P., & Perotte, R. (2019). Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open, 9(2), e022137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022137

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
Include in-text citations in your response
Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
Follow APA-7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
Follow APA 7th edition
Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
Here are some helpful links
Student paper example
Citing Sources
The Writing Center is a great resource