MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
Capella University MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
The introduction for the Capella University MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
After the introduction, move into the main part of the MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
MSN 6218: Unit 9 Discussion Resolving Ethical Issues in Professional Practice
As a professional nurse leader, you are tasked with applying current standards,
obtaining key stakeholder buy in to process change, and applying evidence-based
strategies to maximize patient safety and improve outcomes in an ethical and
culturally competent manner.
Thoroughly
describe an ethical situation or dilemma that you have experienced or are experiencing
in your workplace.
What is the
nature of the ethical issue?
Who are the
stakeholders?
What are
the facts of the case? Impartially present two or more different and distinct
perspectives on this ethical situation or dilemma, with sufficient detail,
support, and justification for each perspective, such that the reader cannot
determine what your own perspective might be.
What are
your knowledge gaps, unknown facts, missing information, unanswered questions,
or areas of uncertainty?
What are
the actual or potential effects on patient safety and outcomes?
Cite
standards or evidence-based strategies that could be applicable in this
situation.
How was the
dilemma resolved or what must be done before the dilemma can be resolved?
Note:
Remember to adhere to the requirements listed in the Faculty Expectations
Message for unit discussion posts and peer responses.
Response
Guidelines
Respond to
two colleagues’ posts. In your responses, consider the following:
Was your
colleague able to present the dilemma impartially (without favoring or
discounting any of the different perspectives); were you able to uncover their
personal perspective?
Suggest at
least one additional resource that could be helpful in resolving the issue.
Based on
the evidence presented by your colleague, how do you think the dilemma should
be resolved?
Learning
Components
This
activity will help you achieve the following learning components:
Determine
desired outcomes.
Identify
existing health care policies and their effects on current and future outcomes.
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.
Also Check Out: MSN 6218: Unit 8 Discussion DQ2 Strategic Planning and Sustainability