NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader– Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader                                

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader    depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader                                

 

The introduction for the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader                                

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader       assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader                                

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader                                

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

As a health policy professional leader, communicating with lay audiences is an important skill in promoting the health of the community for master prepared registered nurses. Develop a concise position statement reflecting the research findings and recommendations by experts as they relate to workplace support for breast feeding mothers, medical marijuana services in the community, genetic testing or applications of stem cell research, transgender care, abortion, end-of-life care,  or a community service administered by Family Nurse Practitioners (if you pick this one be specific about the type of community service the FNP would work in or manage).

Healthcare policy has direct impact on the APRN by describing scope of practice including responsibilities and specific activities they can perform.  Healthcare policy also sets regulations and requirements to meet educational and competency standards to practice safely. It is through healthcare policy that APRNs are reimbursed and paid for services. Although there is uniform education preparation around the country, each state has different definitions of scope of practice and healthcare policy with varying practice regulation (Poghosyan, 2018). Policies that allow APRNs to practice independently support professional growth, reduce cost, and promote sustainability.  Restrictions placed on APRNs prevent professional growth and decreases their ability to provide quick and effective comprehensive care for individuals (Kleinpell et al., 2023).   According to Poghosyan (2018), APNs can significantly improve the healthcare system by alleviating access, quality, and cost challenges (Poghosyan, 2018). During the pandemic, the scope of practice for the APRN was expanded revealing improvement in screening, testing, and treatments for the public (Nickitas, 2021). It is important to advance the APRN profession through leadership, research, and representation in policy making.

It is the essence of the APRN to advocate for patient’s quality healthcare and is the role for which it was founded.  This enables the APRN to promote for the best interest of the healthcare system, nursing profession and the interest of their patients.  PEARL stands for practice, education, advocacy, research, and leadership: the five categories for which APRN’s should strive for excellence (Kapu, 2022).  When considering advocacy, developing the progressive role of the APRN include changing restrictions and promoting the profession. As research has shown, it is evident that APRNs improve the quality of care via clinical trials, quality improvement projects, and retrospective analysis (Kapu, 2022).  Advocating for the profession will in turn improve quality healthcare.

With the focus on the NONPF NP competency Health Policy Leader, transformational leadership has proved to successfully influence policy change and is accepted in the healthcare industry as the preferred leadership style (DeNisco and Barker, 2015).  The four pillars of transformational leadership, as described by James MacGregor Burns, include idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration.  With this approach, these attributes and behaviors empower and motivate team members while building trust (Collins et al., 2020).  While this leadership style focuses on inspiration to create positive change, it motivates team members to achieve their full potential.  Idealized influence refers to displaying high ethical standards including integrity, honesty, and a strong sense of purpose that followers want to emulate.  Inspirational motivation allows followers to see a vision while setting goals and a sense of purpose.  Intellectual stimulation allows for creativity and innovation.  Lastly, individual consideration allows for recognition of individual strengths (Collins et al., 2010).  According to DeNisco and Barker (2015), the pillars based on transformational leadership for NP leadership include professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills.  With the reconstruction of the terms for the pillars of transformational leadership, they have the same goal to support the influence of policy change by empowering APRNs to work towards equitable policies, plans and decisions, and rebuilding resources through inspiration and trust (Boamah, 2022).

Boamah S. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership on nurse faculty satisfaction and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated mediated analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 78(9), 2815–2826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15198

Collins, E., Owen, P., Digan, J., & Dunn, F. (2020). Applying transformational leadership in nursing practice. Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 35(5), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2019.e11408Links to an external site.

DeNisco, S., & Barker, A. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession. (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Kapu, A. (2022). Nurse practitioner (NP) advocacy and education: It’s all about excellence in health care. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 18(2), 135–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2021.12.017Links to an external site.

Kapu, A.  (2022). PEARL: Keeping focus on practice, education, advocacy, research, and readership for nurse practitioners in 2023. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 52(12), 687–689. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001234Links to an external site.

Kleinpell, R., Myers, C., & Schorn, M. (2023). Addressing barriers to APRN practice: Policy and regulatory implications during COVID-19. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 14(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00064-9Links to an external site.

Nickitas. D.  (2021). Against the odds: How APNs shape and sustain health of populations. Nursing Economic, 39(5), 210–213.

Poghosyan, L. (2018). Federal, state, and organizational barriers affecting nurse practitioner workforce and practice. (Health Policy and Politics). Nursing Economic, 36(1), 43-45. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=6889ad49-3674-454e-b5a2-d018d92587c1%40redisLinks to an external site.

ALSO READ:

NR 506 Week 8 Discussion Reflection: Global Policy Reform

NR 506- Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform

NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform

Transformational leadership is a type of leadership that involves the person to take charge while including other individuals to play their part. The best way I can describe it, is allowing each of your staff to become leaders themselves to guide their path in the organization. It is holding everyone accountable and listening to their input in needed changes. You have to lead by example not through managing people. Transformational leaders are usually found working beside their employees, they are easily found, and easy to talk to. NPs that practice this type of leadership can make serious changes to nursing care, because we are nurses who have continued education to a point where we can become more involved in policy changes that influence nursing as a whole.

According to Bergman-Evans (2021) the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) made changes to quality-of-care practices in nursing homes, allowing for administrators with their doctors in nursing (DON) to step up. DONs are important in creating quality standards of care, recruitment of new staff, and resource management. There is a positive impact from nurse practitioner influence within long term care and Sub acute nursing facilities because their accessibility to nursing staff helps to elevate overall functioning of the facility (Bergman-Evans, 2021). They are available to nursing staff on a one-to-one basis, with the ability to explain changes in disease patterns, goals of care, and assist with changes to elevate patient outcomes. Facilities like nursing homes place nurse practitioners in a leadership role with the ability to make a difference in patient outcomes and daily living.

 

Reference:

Bergman-Evans. (2021). Out of the Shadows: Nurse Practitioner Leadership in Skilled and Long-Term Care Facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 47(8), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20210707-01

 

Transformational leadership is a type of leadership that involves the person to take charge while including other individuals to play their part. The best way I can describe it, is allowing each of your staff to become leaders themselves to guide their path in the organization. It is holding everyone accountable and listening to their input in needed changes. You have to lead by example not through managing people. Transformational leaders are usually found working beside their employees, they are easily found, and easy to talk to. NPs that practice this type of leadership can make serious changes to nursing care, because we are nurses who have continued education to a point where we can become more involved in policy changes that influence nursing as a whole.

According to Bergman-Evans (2021) the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) made changes to quality-of-care practices in nursing homes, allowing for administrators with their doctors in nursing (DON) to step up. DONs are important in creating quality standards of care, recruitment of new staff, and resource management. There is a positive impact from nurse practitioner influence within long term care and Sub acute nursing facilities because their accessibility to nursing staff helps to elevate overall functioning of the facility (Bergman-Evans, 2021). They are available to nursing staff on a one-to-one basis, with the ability to explain changes in disease patterns, goals of care, and assist with changes to elevate patient outcomes. Facilities like nursing homes place nurse practitioners in a leadership role with the ability to make a difference in patient outcomes and daily living.

 

Reference:

Bergman-Evans. (2021). Out of the Shadows: Nurse Practitioner Leadership in Skilled and Long-Term Care Facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 47(8), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20210707-01

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

• Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
• Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
• Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
• Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
• Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
• Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
• For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
• Also Read: NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 6 Discussion Using the Media

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.

   

3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

5. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader 

Grading Rubric

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.