NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
Chamberlain University NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NR 536 Week 5 Assignment Develop an Evolving Case Study
The Developing an Evolving Case Study assignment is due on Sunday of Week 5 at 11:59 p.m. MT. The guidelines and rubric are listed below, as well as in the downloadable document.
Developing an Evolving Case Study Guidelines and RubricPreview the document
Developing an Evolving Case Study Template (Links to an external site.)
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to develop an evolving case study that would be useful as part of a small group activity in the clinical setting. It should not be written for a simulation learning activity. Using a concept presented in Weeks 2, 3, and 4, the student incorporates the elements expected of an evolving case study, as well as pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.
CO 1: Synthesize educational theories and knowledge from nursing and health sciences to foster experiential learning strategies and positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1)
CO 2: Integrate pathophysiologic mechanisms with advanced assessment and pharmacologic concepts to maximize holistic, person-centered outcomes in complex disease states. (POs 1, 2, 3, 5)
CO 3: Integrate caring and person-centered concepts within diverse practice settings to maximize healthcare and learner outcomes. (PO 2)
CO 4: Employ a spirit of inquiry to foster professional development to facilitate the achievement of educational outcomes. (PO 3)
CO 6: Promote positive health and education outcomes by fostering the use of evidence-based and interprofessional strategies in experiential settings. (PO 5)
Requirements
Description of the Assignment
This assignment requires the student to develop an evolving case study that would be useful in either the clinical or classroom setting. It is not written for a simulation learning activity. The evolving case study must focus on a concept assigned from Giddens (2017) required textbook during Weeks 2, 3, and 4. In addition, the student must identify Socratic questions related to the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and health assessment used in the evolving case study. The study demonstrates the following.
Initial presentation (i.e., Stage 1) regarding the health status of the patient
Progress to Stage 2 with the occurrence of event that requires the identification of the appropriate response from learners
Ends with Stage 3 that is based upon the action identified by learners
Development of Socratic questions useful for debriefing following completion of the evolving case study are required.
Criteria for Content
Overview of the assignment:
The evolving case study starts with background information that provides an overview; description of the patient; and the report provided to the participants using the format of situation, background, assessment, and recommendation (SBAR). Progressing over time with a fictional patient’s health status changing, this evolving case study presents the situation in three stages. Stage 1 is the initial stage where the patient’s healthcare situation is presented, followed by a trigger that represents a health challenge, or worsening of the health. Participants identify the appropriate interventions to maintain a stable health status, as well as recognize via assessment the deterioration in the fictional patient’s health. Stage 2 continues the presentation of the patient with progressive decline in health status requiring the identification of appropriate actions by participants. A trigger for Stage 3 will be identified based on the stabilization of the fictional patient. Outcome of the evolving case study is suggested as part of Stage 3. Preparation for debriefing of participants is considered by the identification of Socratic questions.
Required content for the assignment is the following.
Part 1: Overview of evolving case study
Description of the evolving case study
Identify the purpose
Identify the type of learner that the case study is developed for
Identify the concept to be demonstrated by the fictional patient
Description of the setting
Part 2: Description of fictional patient by identifying each of the following elements
Name
Gender/age/weight/height
Allergies
Past medical history
History of present illness
Social history
Primary medical diagnosis
Surgeries and/or procedures with dates
Part 3: Develop the report that learners receive prior to the start of the evolving case study using SBAR
Time of report
Identify person providing the report
Identify each of the following for SBAR
Situation
Background
Assessment
Recommendation
Part 4: Stage 1: Start of the healthcare situation with required elements
Evolving case study information to be presented to the learner
One action that a learner SHOULD identify and is APPROPRIATE for the situation
Socratic question for each area to ask learner at end of Stage 1
Pathophysiology
Physical assessment
Pharmacology
Trigger for Stage 2
Part 5: Stage 2: Deterioration in fictional patient’s health status with required elements
Evolving case study information to be presented to the learner
One action that a learner SHOULD identify and is APPROPRIATE for the situation
Socratic question for each area to ask learner at end of Stage 2
Pathophysiology
Physical assessment
Pharmacology
Trigger for Stage 3
Part 6: Stage 3: Stabilization of fictional patient with required elements
Evolving case study information to be presented to the learner
One action that a learner SHOULD identify and is APPROPRIATE for the situation
Socratic question for each area to ask learner at end of Stage 3
Pathophysiology
Physical assessment
Pharmacology
Expected ending for case study if learner’s actions are APPROPRIATE for the situation
Part 7: Debriefing
Socratic Question 1 (focusing on overall Stage 1)
Socratic Question 2 (focusing on overall Stage 2)
Socratic Question 3 (focusing on overall Stage 3)
Socratic Question 4 (focusing on the overall case study)
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
The assignment should not exceed eight pages in length, excluding the title page and reference page.
The use of the template for Week 5 Assignment is required.
Expectations regarding graduate level include all of the following elements.
Correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation
Exceptional writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper
Congruence with APA mechanics of style\
Template for Week 5’s Assignment: Development of an Evolving Case Study for Clinical or Classroom Setting
| Overview of Evolving Case Study | |
| Learning Objectives | |
| Description of the Evolving Case Study:
· Purpose · Identify type learner · Concept to be presented |
The purpose of this case study is to use an actual case in a clinical setting to engage all the clinical skills such as psychomotor, cognitive, and communication to facilitate learning. The type of learner that will benefit from this case study will be a will be a student on internship or apprenticeship. The concept that will be used for the demonstration is involving the student the evaluation an actual case in a clinical environment and in making decisions concerning therapeutic strategy. . |
| Description of the Setting: | The setting takes place in a healthcare facility which the access to various departments such as the consultation room, wards, and theatre room. |
| Description of Patient | |
| Name | Ms. Elena Atieno |
| Gender/Age/Weight/Height | Caucasian female /age 35/weight65Kg |
| Allergies | Spring season (seasonal allergy) |
| Past medical history | Infertility (for 15 years) and hypertension |
| History of present illness | Deterioration of nutritional status and severe continuous vomiting |
| Social history | Drinks hard-drinks on Saturdays |
| Primary medical diagnosis | Change in behaviors, confusion, and drowsiness (Gasalberti et al. 2017) |
| Surgeries and/or procedures with dates | Urgent operation for brain decompression |
| Report that Learners receive to prior start of the Evolving Case Study using SBAR Format | |
| Time of report | 8 am |
| Person providing the report | The patient, nurses in charge of the patient, student, and physician monitoring the patient pregnancy. |
| Situation | Ms. Atieno woke up with so much nausea and vomiting continuously despite the fact that her pregnancy was almost 31 weeks. She prepared herself to go to the hospital because she had been instructed to do so in case of any changes since her pregnancy was a high risk one. On the way she experience some seizure and lost her way to the hospital. A motorist found her and rushed her to the hospital. She was emaciated and vomiting. The neuro surgery team decided for urgent operation |
| Background | The patient has had problems with her pregnancy since the first month. She normally uses fexofenadine for her seasonal allergies. She had to seek doctor’s advice whether to continue with her normal medication for the allergies or not. Doctors evaluated her situation and concluded that fexofenadine was not fatal to her and the baby but she had to avoid pollen grains by closing windows, staying indoors, and using air conditioning whenever necessary (Presa et al., 2016). She had been keeping weekly check-ups with her physician. For the last two days, her condition was unstable, she was dizzy, drowsy, frequent nausea, and kept getting confused. That morning she kept vomiting and decided to go for medical checkup |
| Assessment | The patient struggles to vomit but nothing in coming out. She is not speaking but when asked questions she gives answers which make no sense. Her doctor is reporting that she is thin and her weight has been reducing. She is hypertensive 150/90 and has a normal kidney function. Her Hb. is 6,5gm/dl and the baby is nearly mature though underweight. Liver enzymes were 2 fold, 2,5, albumin, and 65% prothrombin |
| Recommendation | Blood transfusion for 4 units of human albumin, 4 units of packed RBCs, and 4 units of fresh plasma two days prior to surgery. Obstetric preparation for an emergency cesarean section. Pediatric on standby in case of an urgent cesarean section. |
| Evolving Case Study Progression | |||
| Evolving Case Study Information to be presented to the Learner
|
Actions Learners SHOULD Demonstrate | Socratic Question for each area to ask learner at end of stage | |
| Stage One (Start of the case study) | The patient is struggling to vomit. Her mother and her nurse is trying to get her to stop but she cannot. The nurse is asking her how she got to the hospital but says she does not know.
At some point, she said she trekked to the hospital. |
The student should demonstrate the knowledge of Anesthesia examination | Pathophysiology:
Physical Assessment:
Pharmacology:
|
| Trigger for Stage Two: | |||
| Stage Two:
|
The patient is hypertensive 150/90. Her Hb. is 6,5gm/dl. Liver enzymes were 2 fold, 2,5, albumin, and 65% prothrombin. She is losing awareness of her present situation | The student demonstrate the parameters involved in the Anesthesia examination are measured and recorded. | Pathophysiology:
Physical Assessment:
Pharmacology:
|
| Trigger for Stage Three: | |||
| Stage Three:
|
The patients has passed out again. | The student should demonstrate the knowledge of Preoperative preparation | Pathophysiology:
Physical Assessment:
Pharmacology:
|
| Expected ending for case study if learner’s actions are APPROPRIATE:
|
|||
| Debriefing | |||
| Socratic Question #1 (focusing on Stage 1) | Which concept did you apply during the demonstration?
How did the concept enhance learning? |
||
| Socratic Question #2 (focusing on Stage 2) | What can you remember about your patient? | ||
| Socratic Question #3 (focusing on Stage 3) | What indicative signs did the patient present on arrival? | ||
| Socratic Question #4 (focusing on the overall case study) | What tests would you recommend?
What were the alternative medications? |
||
References
Gasalberti, D., Reiff, J., Lambert, K., Emrich, J., & Poli, J. (2017). Pregnancy discovered during radiation of an atypical meningioma. Practical radiation oncology, 7(6), e427-e430.
McKinney, E. S., & Murray, S. S. (2017). Study Guide for Maternal-Child Nursing-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Presa, I. J., Rodríguez, B. N., Bareño, B. R., Setién, P. M. G., Etxebarria, I. U., & Ercoreca, I. A. (2016). Chronic Urticaria in Special Populations: Children, Pregnancy, Lactation and Elderly People. Current Treatment Options in Allergy, 3(4), 423-438.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Read Also: NR 536 Week 7 Assignment Designing an Experiential Learning Activity
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.