coursework-banner

NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment

NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment

Chamberlain University NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment– Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University   NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment                                

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University   NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment    depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment                                

 

The introduction for the Chamberlain University   NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment                                

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment       assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment                                

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment                                

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Week 2 Assignment

Lifestyle and Health Practices Profile Guidelines

Purpose

This assignment is to help you gain insight regarding the influence of an individual’s lifestyle and health-related practices, on their opportunities for health promotion. You are to obtain a lifestyle and health practices profile using yourself as the client, and then practice analyzing the data to formulate a health promotion nursing diagnosis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO #1)

CO5: Explore the professional responsibilities involved in conducting a comprehensive health assessment and provide appropriate documentation. (PO #6)

Points

This assignment is worth a total of 200 points.

Due Date

The Lifestyle and Health Practices Profile is to be submitted at the end of Week 2.

Disclaimer

Sample Answer for  NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment

When completing a Lifestyle and Health Profile on an actual client, it is essential that the information is accurate and all areas are addressed. **Please note that for this assignment, a few sections containing sensitive information have been marked optional.** This assignment will only be shared for academic-related purposes, and will not be seen by your classmates. However, if you wish to leave any of the areas marked “option to not respond” blank, points will not be deducted. All areas not marked as optional must be completed for full credit. Contact your instructor if you have any questions or concerns.

I would want to collect more subjective and objective data from Maria. As for subjective, I would want to hear her describe her emotional state. (i.e. happy, stressed, sad) I would want to collect data regarding her personal health history and her family health history. It would also be helpful to know her values and beliefs in addition to her family relationships and support system. Lastly, I would want her to describe her daily routine, bedtime routine, and a typical eating routine. Additional objective data I would want to collect would be her current weight, blood work, including cholesterol and blood glucose, skin turgor, and reflexes.

I would identify her sleep deficit and caffeine use as immediate health concerns.  Her 14 lb weight gain is definitely a risk factor for heart and circulation issues.  I would also consider the amount of work that she assumes responsibility for is a risk to her sense of well being.

In order to promote health and wellness for Maria, we will first have to identify ways her family can contribute to lightening her stress load. Maria could meet with her family members and find ways to distribute the household work. This could allow her time for relaxation, studying or light exercise. We could also discuss teaching her family the recipes that she likes to cook. This would also provide quality time with her family, thus relieving the stress of feeling she has to do it all. We could explore technology to help her relax, such as apps on her phone for 10 minute meditations, or using the reading feature on her electronic school books to listen to her reading assignments while taking a leisurely walk.  Lastly, we could explore strategies to promote a more restful sleep. In my office setting, we often discuss sleep hygiene, which can help improve one’s psychological and physiologic well-being. (Jaffe & Engelke, 2018)

My nursing diagnosis for Maria would focus on her sleep deficit. Therefore, using the formula in our textbook, I would write an actual nursing diagnosis. (Janet R. Weber Rn Edd & Kelley, 2018, Tables 5-1) My nursing diagnosis for Maria would be, Sleep Deficit, related to demands of household and schoolwork, as manifested by average sleep time of 5 hours, and patient’s dependence on caffeine to, “keep her going”, and “stay awake” throughout the day.

 

References

Jaffe, S., & Engelke, Z. (2018). Patient Education: Teaching Adult Patients Good Sleep Hygiene (Sleep Habits) Techniques (D. Pravikoff, Ed.). CINAHL Nursing Guide.

Janet R. Weber Rn Edd & Kelley, J. H. (2018). Health assessment in nursing (6th ed.). Lww.

Sample Answer 2 for NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment

Maria is stressed just like many nursing students who are also mothers. She is Hispanic, eats lots of foods, drinks a lot of caffeine including diet soda. I would like to know how many diet colas Maria drinks per day to start. I would also ask about family history of diabetes and hypertension. I would want to check Maria’s blood sugar randomly. I would also want to know more about sauces, spices, fat content, and amount of carbohydrates in the foods Maria is eating.

I have a concern for hypertension and diabetes based on lifestyle, heritage, and recent weight gain. Hispanic people are at risk for hypertension and comorbidities with that hypertension like diabetes (Patel, et al, 2012).

Maria would benefit from seeing a dietician who could pinpoint diet modifications needed. A food journal for maybe 3 days would help highlight what exactly is being consumed. Inventory of food intake is great accountability. Maria could download the lose it app to track food and break down food groups.

For Maria, it is important to focus on diet planning about “lowering sodium” in foods and getting involved in an exercise program (Patel, et al, 2012). Her blood pressure is high, maybe due to added stress she is cooking more comfort foods or eating more. Maria can involve the family or get involved in community events for weight loss and health promotion (Patel, et al, 2012). Maria could benefit from stopping her diet soda intake altogether and benefiting from snack with energy and more water intake. Taking inventory can help in “prevention and wellness” for the entire family (Patel, et al, 2012).

Nursing diagnosis:

“Readiness for enhanced health management” r/t weight gain of 14 lbs. as manifested by concern for risks to health. (Weber and Kelly, 2018).

References

Patel, N. K., Wood, R. C. Espino, D. V. (2012). Cultural considerations: Pharmacological and nonpharmacological means for improving blood pressures control among Hispanic patients. International Journal of Hypertension. Pp 1-6.  http://dx.doi.org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/10.1155/2012/831016

Weber, J.R. & Kelley, J.H. (2018). Health assessment in nursing (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Sample Answer 3 for NR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 2 Assignment

With regard to additional assessment data, first, I would repeat Maria’s blood pressure to confirm that this number is accurate; then I would ask Maria about her previous weight and measure her current height and weight. If she was underweight in the past, a 14-pound weight gain, over the course of one year, may not be a problem. However, if this recent weight gain puts Maria near or in the overweight category, then her health may be at risk. I would ask Maria about family medical history, her own past and current medical history, surgical history, allergies, immunizations, current medications, and any current symptoms. I would then perform a head-to-toe assessment with a focus on any areas where Maria is experiencing symptoms. I would also ask about Maria’s current psychological state: How does she feel about her current schedule? Is she overwhelmed or anxious? In addition, I would gather information about Maria’s current support system: Is her spouse supportive, and would it be possible for her spouse to help with some of Maria’s responsibilities at home? I would also gather more detailed information about Maria’s eating habits: when she eats (times of day), what she eats (home-cooked meals or fast food), how often she eats, etc.

If Maria’s blood pressure is indeed accurate, then Maria is clearly hypertensive at this time. Her increased blood pressure could be related to increased stress and/or increased consumption of caffeine. A family history of hypertension could also put Maria at risk. If Maria’s weight gain continues, she could be at risk for developing a nutrition imbalance; this can put her at risk for heart disease, diabetes, and impaired physical mobility. In addition, if Maria does not find a way to manage her stress and get more sleep, this will contribute to the aforementioned health concerns and could lead to other health concerns and burn out.

Maria’s increased systolic blood pressure, consumption of multiple caffeinated beverages per day, recent weight gain, hectic schedule, insufficient amount of sleep, and lack of stress relief all provide opportunities to promote health and wellness. After establishing Maria’s preferred learning style and drawing on any knowledge she may currently have on these subjects, I would provide Maria with information that she can understand and apply to her life. Keeping in mind the importance of proper verbal and non-verbal communication, I would present this information in a non-judgmental manner with a focus on helping Maria achieve optimum health (Weber & Kelley, 2018). I would teach Maria about the risks and complications associated with hypertension and how it can be managed or prevented. I would council Maria about the importance of adequate water intake and a balanced diet; I would also educate Maria about the dangers of increased caffeine and sugary drink consumption and how these can worsen hypertension and put her at risk for other health issues. If possible, I would refer Maria to a registered dietitian or nutritionist. I would try to help Maria understand the importance of stress management by showing her how stress has impacted her health so far and how it can continue to affect her future health if it is not addressed. I would also provide Maria with suggestions for time management, and perhaps a weekly schedule template, so that Maria can plainly see how her time is spent and where it may be possible to include more time for self-care and sleep. I would also encourage Maria to talk with her spouse and other family members, if possible, so that she can share what she is going through and perhaps get some help from them.

Quite a few nursing diagnoses can be applied to Maria’s case. I have decided to focus on stress management, as I have found this to be an area that is frequently overlooked or under-addressed. By no means am I prioritizing this area of diagnosis over any other, this is merely the one I chose to use. The diagnosis I chose is as follows: Stress Overload r/t increase in educational responsibilities compounded with household responsibilities AMB decreased hours of sleep and stated inability to find time to relax and de-stress.

 

References:

Weber, J.R. & Kelley, J.H. (2018). Health Assessment in Nursing (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

ALSO READ:

NR 305 Week 2 Discussion Assessment for Health Promotion

NR 305 Week 2 Assignment Lifestyle and Health Practices Profile Guidelines

NR 305 Week 3 Discussion Exploring Popular Diet Trends

NR305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 4 Assignment

NR 305 Week 4 Discussion Community Access to Mental Health Services

NR 305 Week 4 Assignment Patient Teaching Plan

NR 305 Week 4 Assignment Visual Teaching Tool

NR 305 Week 5 Discussion Assessing for Family Violence

NR305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Week 6 Assignment

NR 305 Week 6 Discussion Providing Culturally Competent Nursing Care

NR 305 Week 6 Assignment Physical Examination Video Demonstration

NR 305 Week 7 Discussion Assessment Techniques

NR 305 Week 8 Discussion Case Study or Share an Experience

Directions

Download the required NR305 Week 2 Personal Lifestyle Form March19 (Links to an external site.). You will document your responses to the profile using this MS Word document.

Complete the Life and Health Practices Profile, using yourself as the client. Please document your responses professionally, as you would in a client’s actual health record. Provide enough information to have answered the questions completely. For clarity, write full sentences in your documentation. To receive full credit, all questions must be addressed, except for those indicated as optional. If a question does not apply to you, please indicate this in the findings as “N/A”.

Once you have completed the profile, type your answers to the three questions listed under the form. APA format is not a requirement, however, please write in paragraph form when appropriate. Sentence structure, spelling, and grammar are important.

You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.

Save the completed form by clicking on Save as and add your last name to the file name, for example, NR305_W2_Personal_ Lifestyle_Form_Smith.

Submit the completed form to the Lifestyle and Health Practices Profile form by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2. Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forums so the entire class may view the answers.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) 375 37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) 200 20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) 200 20%
Executive Summary (Week 7) 225 22.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.