NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Grand Canyon University NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations-Step -By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NRS-433V Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Job-related stress is one of the health problems that nurses face in their practice. Nurses are highly predisposed to stress due to the complex nature of the interaction that they have with their environments. The persistent exposure of nurses to complex demands of care in their workplaces predisposes them to chronic stress as well as other pathological problems such as burnout and job dissatisfaction. Persistent exposure to stressful conditions often leads to emotional exhaustion, disengagement and loss of interest in work (Shariatkhah et al., 2017). The effects of job-related stress on nursing and quality of nursing care are documented in studies. Accordingly, stress predisposes nurses to negative health outcomes that include depression, anxiety, and job dissatisfaction. It also increases the risk of high rate of turnover among them, high rates of medication errors and safety issues in healthcare, and high costs of operation. Interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapies are effective in reducing the effects and impacts of job-related stress in nursing (Bagheri et al., 2019). However, its use has not been explored in my practice. Therefore, the purpose of the project is to explore quantitative studies that investigated the use of cognitive behavioral therapies in managing stress among nurses. The PICOT question is, in registered nurses working in the emergency department, does the education on cognitive behavioral therapy reduce job stress when compared to no intervention within 8 months? The significance of the project to nursing is that it will improve safety, quality, and cost-efficiency in patient care.
Background
The studies by Bagheri et al., (2019) and were selected for this review. The study by Bagheri et al., (2019) determined the effects of teaching stress-coping strategies as well as cognitive behavioral therapy on burnout and stress to nurses. The problem that necessitated this study was the limited evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on burnout and stress among nurses. The significance of the study to nursing is that it bridges the gap in evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in job-related stress and burnout. The research question for the project was not stated. It can however be inferred to have been, what is the effects of teaching stress-coping strategies and cognitive behavioral therapy on burnout and stress among nurses? The study by Shariatkhah et al., (2017) was conducted with the aim of determining the effects of cognitive behavioral stress management on stress experienced by nurses. The nursing problem that informed this study was the high prevalence of job-related stress among nurses with scarcity of evidence on efficacy of cognitive behavioral stress management strategies. The significance of the research to nursing is that it informs the quality improvement interventions that can be used to improve the health and wellbeing of nurses. The research question can be inferred to have been, what are the effects of cognitive behavioral stress management on nurses’ job stress?
How They Support Practice Issue
The articles by Shariatkhah et al., (2017) and Bagheri et al., (2019) answers the PICOT question of the proposed project. The study by Shariatkhah et al., (2017) investigated the effects of a cognitive-behavioral stress management program on stress among nurses. The study showed that the use of cognitive-behavioral stress management program was associated with a significant decline in the stress levels among nurses. The article therefore answers the PICOT question by showing that the use of cognitive behavioral interventions are effective in reducing stress experienced by nurses in the workplace. The study Bagheri et al., (2019) investigated the effects of group cognitive behavioral therapy and stress-coping strategies on burnout among nurses. The results of the study showed that group cognitive-behavioral therapy and stress coping strategies were effective in reducing burnout and its correlates that included stress among nurses. This study will answer the PICOT question by showing the beneficial effects of cognitive behavioral therapy in reducing stress among nurses. The interventions and comparison groups in the selected articles also compare to those identified in the PICOT question. The study by Shariatkhah et al., (2017) used nurses and cognitive behavioral therapy in their investigated. Similarly, the research by Bagheri et al., (2019) investigated the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy using nurses. The focus was on stress among nurses, hence, similarity to the PICOT question.
Methods of the Studies
The selected studies utilized quantitative study designs. The methods used in both studies were the same. Both studies utilized
semi-experimental/quasi-experimental study design to investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy in stress levels among nurses. The study by Bagheri et al., (2019) used a larger sample size (60 nurses) when compared to that of Shariatkhah et al., (2017) (40 participants). Both studies were also pre and post-test interventional investigations. One benefit associated with semi-experimental study design that were used in the articles is that the studies utilize less resources to undertake it. The study is however associated with the weakness of not utilizing randomization. Randomization affects the reliability and validity of the study outcomes.
Results
The study by Shariatkhah et al., (2017) showed that cognitive behavioral stress management was associated with a significant decline in stress level among nurses. The researchers found that there was a significant reduction in the mean score and standard deviation in stress levels among the nurses post-intervention. The mean score and standard deviation before and after intervention were 3.48 (0.22) and 2.8 (0.2) in the group that received the intervention and 3.48 (0.21) and 3.56 (0.2) in the control group. The study by Bagheri et al., (2019) found that cognitive behavioral intervention and stress-coping strategies were effective in reducing burnout among nurses. The effectiveness of the interventions were maintained after one month of the study. The implications of the two studies on nursing is that cognitive behavioral therapy is an effective intervention that can be used for stress management. Nurses should advocate its use for the promotion of safety and quality in nursing care.
Outcomes Comparison
One of the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT question is the reduction in the level of stress among registered nurses working in the emergency department. The use of cognitive behavioral interventions is expected to reduce the perceived level of stress that nurses experience in their workplace. The other outcome is the nurses developing effecting coping strategies for managing job-related stress. It is also expected that indicators of safety and quality will decline with the implementation of the intervention. The indicators will include the rate of medication errors and adverse events in the emergency department. The implementation of the intervention is also expected to result in an improvement in the level of job satisfaction among nurses. The improvement is anticipated to reduce the costs incurred in the organization due to hiring and retaining new nurses. The anticipated outcomes of the PICOT share close similarities with those reported in the selected articles. Accordingly, the outcomes in the selected articles included the reduction in stress levels and burnout among the nurses. The focus in the PICOT question is also on the reduction in the levels of stress among nurses. Therefore, it is anticipated that the project will provide critical insights into the success and weaknesses of the intervention in improving the mental health and wellbeing of nurses working in the emergency department.
Conclusion
The review of the selected quantitative articles shows that job-related stress is a critical issue in the nursing practice. The use of cognitive behavioral strategies are effective in minimizing the effects of job-related stress among nurses. Cognitive behavioral therapy strategies reduce the levels of stress among the affected nurses as well as its indicators such as burnout. Health organizations should therefore explore the ways in which cognitive behavioral therapy can be used to minimize the negative effects of job-related stress among nurses.
References
Bagheri, T., Fatemi, M. J., Payandan, H., Skandari, A., & Momeni, M. (2019). The effects of stress-coping strategies and group cognitive-behavioral therapy on nurse burnout. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters, 32(3), 184–189.
Shariatkhah, J., Farajzadeh, Z., & Khazaee, K. (2017). The Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management on Nurses’ Job Stress. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(5), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.215683