NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NUR 513 Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Studies
Image of hospital nurse using computer (Life in View, n.d.).Qualitative and quantitative research each have value in evidence-based practice and leading industry standards. In this discussion, you will critique research and respond to your peers’ evaluations for both types of research.
This activity will address the following module outcome:
MO 2: Assess evidence and analyze its usefulness for a clinical problem. (EPSLO 2; SLO 5)
In this discussion, you will critique a quantitative and qualitative research study. To give everyone in class an opportunity to critique both types of research, please follow the instructions below. Examples of how to use the quantitative Preview the document [DOCX, file size 25 KB] and qualitative Preview the document [DOCX, file size 28 KB] score card are provided for you.
If your last name begins with A-M:
Read the study by Spiva, et al. (2017). Complete the quantitative research score card Preview the document [XLSX, file size 21 KB] as you review the study. Use Chapters 5 & 6 in Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2019) as a resource. Post a brief summary (1-2 paragraphs) of all components listed on the Research Critique Form. Please entitle your initial discussion post: Critique of Spiva, et al. (2017).
Read the study by Hundt, et al. (2018). Reply to a minimum of two other classmates who have posted a Critique of Hundt, et al. (2018) for their initial discussion.
If your last name begins with N-Z:
ALSO READ: NUR 513 Discussion Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Part II Excelsior
Read the study by Hundt, et al. (2018). Complete the qualitative research score cardPreview the document [XLSX, file size 21 KB] as you review the study. Use Chapters 5 & 6 in Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2019) as a resource. Post a brief summary (1-2 paragraphs) of all components listed on the Research Critique Form. Please entitle your initial discussion post: Critique of Hundt, et al. (2018).
Read the study by Spiva, et al. (2017). Reply to a minimum of two other classmates who have posted a Critique of Spiva, et al. (2017).
Spiva, L., Hart, P. L., Patrick, S., Waggoner, J., Jackson, C., & Threatt, J. L. (2017). Effectiveness of an evidence-based practice nurse mentor training program (Links to an external site.). Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), 183–191. https://doi-org.vlib.excelsior.edu/10.1111/wvn.12219 Hundt, N. E., Helm, A., Smith, T. L., Lamkin, J., Cully, J. A., & Stanley, M. A. (2018). Failure to engage: A qualitative study of veterans who decline evidence-based psychotherapies for PTSD (Links to an external site.). Psychological Services, 15(4), 536–542. https://doi-org.vlib.excelsior.edu/10.1037/ser0000212
Critical appraisal of source of evidence is an important skill that nurses should possess for them to promote evidence-based practice in their care. Critical appraisal enables the nurses to determine the quality, relevance, and need of evidence presented in a research article. I would focus on the following three sections as I undertake the critical appraisal if I were the nurse in the scenario. The first section I will appraise is the title of the journal. I will check the journal to determine its relevance to my area of interest. I will check the journal to determine if the focus of the research is specific to a given issue of interest in nursing (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). I will also focus on the year in which the journal was published. One of the advantages of appraising using this approach is that it is easy to acquire an understanding of the research focus of the journal. It also saves time that could have been used reading through the other sections of the journal. The approach however does not give information about the design that was used. It might also lead to the elimination of journals that might have new knowledge related to the area of focus in a research.
The second section that I will quickly appraise is the abstract section. I will skim through the abstract to acquire an understanding of the focus of the research. My focus in the analysis of the abstract section will be on the aims of the study, methods used, results, conclusions, and recommendations. The aim of the research should be clearly written. The methods that were utilized for recruiting participants, collecting data, analysing data, and study design should be provided in the materials and methods section of the abstract. The results should link with the variables under the investigations in the research (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The conclusion should also answer the question of focus in the journal and provide implications of the research to practice. One of the advantages of using this approach is that is provides precise information about the focus of the journal. It also enables the determination of quality journals that can inform the research focus. The approach however does not provide adequate information on the methods and interventions that were used to control variables. The information in the section is also too abstract that it might be difficult to develop conclusive evidence on the relevance of the journal to the research.
The last section that I will appraise is the methods section of the journal. In will reads through the methods and material section to determine the manner in which the research was actually conducted. I will examine the preciseness of the information presented in this section, the sample size, population, and interventions that were used. I will also seek to determine the measures of the study that were of focus in the investigation (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The data from this section will enable me to determine the credibility and reliability of the reported findings. One of the advantages of using this approach to appraising journals is its focus on the adequacy of the methods used in a research. The approach also enables the determination of the credibility and reliability of the reported findings. The approach is however associated with the disadvantages of this approach is that it takes too much time to get adequate understanding of the methods used and the increased likelihood of lack of relationship between variables and methods used.
References
Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical Appraisal of Clinical Research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942