coursework-banner

NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.

In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.
Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.
Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

Your topic of interest.NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

By Day 7 of Week 5

Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Initial Discussion Post – Week 4

Top of Form

I’ve decided to pursue a career as a psychiatric/mental health nurse practitioner. After 28 years of working as a mental nurse, I made the decision to advance my career. The peer-reviewed article used is entitled. “How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition by the authors Wesemann, Convoy, Goldstein, and Melino. I looked for this article by typing “PMHNP” into the Walden library tab. Next, I selected the “peer-reviewed” link on the left and entered the keyword “psychotherapeutic,” I then restricted my search. A list of articles from the Thoreau/EBSCO search engine appeared, and I chose this particular one.

Finding this peer-reviewed article was not difficult for me. The library database at Walden University is quite trustworthy. Yes, I would recommend this database, because it is accessible, and the full articles are available for usage. “A good database should begin with valuable metadata and data”, (Siyavula. n.d.). Criteria used for selecting a good database is using one that is a reliable monitoring and alerting system, (Guo, 2022). This database will be very helpful to my colleagues for the reasons stated above. My search was able to be limited by a large number of alternatives. The Walden library’s EBSCO database has excellent themes and a big selection of articles, therefore I would definitely recommend it.

References

Guo, L. (2022). How to efficiently choose the right database for your applications. PingCAP. Retrieved from https://www.pingcap.com/blog/how-to-efficiently-choose-the-right-database-for-your-applications/

Siyavula. (n.d.). Characteristics of a good database. Retrieved from https://www.siyavula.com/read/it/grade-12-it/database-design-concepts/02-database-design-concepts

Wesemann, D., Convoy, S., Goldstein, D., & Melino, K. (2022). How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 10783903221091980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221091980

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “Wk5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Using the Module 3 Part 3 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

·   The topic of interest you have selected.

·   Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

·   Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.

The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.

The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.

Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

·   Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.

Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

·   Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

·   Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

·   Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)

The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.

Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)

The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric