NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Walden University NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.
In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.
To Prepare:
- Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.
- Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system.
- Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.
By Day 3 of Week 9
A healthcare organization’s lack of participation in the SDLC while procuring and implementing a new health information technology system might have serious ramifications. Explain how the participation of nurses in the SDLC might assist solve possible concerns at each level and provide specific examples. Then, talk about whether or not you had a say in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization, and discuss the possible consequences of your involvement or lack thereof. The more descriptive you are, the better.
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
The Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) includes planning, analysis, design, execution, assessment, and maintenance stages of information technology design and development. The planning or feasibility stage is where the developers will define the problem and the current system’s scope and identify the new system’s objectives and goals. Nurses’ main role here is to help the team in foreseeing and incorporating patient’s needs in the new system implementation since they are charged with ensuring implementation of safe care procedures (McLeod et al., 2017).
One of the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health system is resistance to the application of the software in healthcare practice. This mainly occurs due to issues such as communication challenges. When nurses are not involved in the SDLC coding stage, a software developer may not get the necessary guidance on the use of medical terminology or patient care data hence failing to use a standardized patient care system that is able to accurately communicate patient care information among healthcare providers and nurses (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). Another consequence is medical errors which may occur because the terminology used by healthcare providers and nurses may be different in terms of the expected outcome and patient care hence creating uncertainty in healthcare instructions.
One of the potential issues at the first stage of the SDLC, which is understanding the problem, is ignoring the users’ needs, hence limiting the applicability of the software. The inclusion of nurses can address this issue by explaining and putting the requirements of the software coherently to reduce the redundancy of the final product. The potential issue in the codding planned solution stage is using the wrong program language (Verma & Gupta, 2017). Nurses can address this issue by guiding the software developer on the right medical terminology to use hence enhancing appropriate communication of patient care information. A potential issue that may arise in the third stage, which includes testing the actual program, is failing to identify challenges that may hinder the functioning of the software. Nurses can address this issue by accessing the credibility of software (Verma & Gupta, 2017). In the deployment and maintenance of the product stage, the main potential issue is adopting software that does not produce the desired results. Nurses can address this issue by identifying issues that may hinder the effective use of the software and proposing practical solutions to address the issues.
I had my first encounter participating in selecting and planning a new healthcare information technology system in my nursing practice after the onset of Covid-19. Our healthcare organization began developing software that would schedule patient visits and remotely monitor patients’ healthcare progress to reduce patient visits to reduce the risk of spreading the Covid-19 virus. The main impact of being included in the decision-making process was suggesting some important features to include in the software to make it user-friendly. For instance, I suggested the medical terminology that all nurses could understand, including interns who may not have medical experience, to understand some complex language in the nursing practice.
References
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Verma, M. P., & Gupta, S. (2017). Software development for nursing: Role of nursing informatics. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 5(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-2660.2017.00044.8
McLeod, A., Hewitt, B., Gibbs, D., & Kristof, C. (2017). Evaluating motivation for the use of an electronic health record simulation game. Perspectives in health information management, 14(spring). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430132/
By Day 6 of Week 9
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 9 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 9 Discussion
Module 5: The Nurse Leader and the System Development Life Cycle (Weeks 9-10)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Also Read:
NURS 6051 Discussion mental health disorders that require a long-term treatment follow-up
NURS 6051 Musculoskeletal, metabolic, and multisystem health dysfunctions
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze how inclusion of the nurse in the purchasing of health information technology systems impacts healthcare organizations
- Analyze the impact of nurse inclusion on each step of the systems development life cycle
| Due By | Assignment |
| Week 9, Days 1–2 | Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post. |
| Week 9, Day 3 | Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 9, Days 4-5 | Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 9, Day 6 | Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post). |
| Week 9, Day 7 | Wrap up Discussion. |
| Week 10, Days 1-6 | Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 10, Day 7 | Deadline to submit your Assignment. |
Learning Resources
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)
- Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)
- Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261)
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
SDLC includes the phases of analysis, design, implementation, evaluation, and maintenance. The importance of nurses as end-users necessitates their participation in each phase of the SDLC (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). The failure to involve nurses in the analytical phase hinders the understanding of the new HITS, hence reducing the efficiency of the adopted information technology. During the design phase, HIT specialists enhance an existing system, suggesting a specific operational mechanism to be implemented into the new system (Ozkaynak et al., 2021). A nurse’s primary responsibility throughout the design phase is to refine and test the system. Therefore, the failure to incorporate a nurse results in the inability of new technology to meet output and input criteria.
Involving nurses in the implementation also hinders the successful operation of the new technology in terms of protocols, coordination, and workflow. If a nurse is not involved in the evaluation process, invalid results may be produced (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). Involving nurses in the maintenance phase may result in a failure to recognize and report the system’s nurse shortage executive bug. Due to the new system’s narrow focus, the failure to include nurses in SDLC may be impacted by the possibility of failure (Alijedaani &Babar, 2021). In my nursing profession, I have participated in the selection and design of new health information technologies. After the implementation of the new system, the participation resulted in trouble balancing alternatives. For instance, has lost confidence in the transformation process, resulting in frustration and fatigue are experienced. When implementing the System Develop Life Cycle, it is possible that some nurses will not attend the training, hence reducing their potential to perform quality job.
References
Aljedaani, B., & Babar, M. A. (2021). The Difficulties of Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications: A Systematic Analysis The 9(6) issue of JMIR mHealth and uHealth contains the article e15654.
https://mhealth.jmir.org/2021/6/e15654/
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the knowledge foundation (4th ed.). Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Ozkaynak, M., Sircar, C. M., Frye, O., & Valdez, R. S. (2021, June). A Systematic Analysis of Health Information Technology Design Workshops In Informatics, volume 8, issue 2, page 34. Institute for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020034
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Regarding the failure to adhere to the SDLC in the introduction of EHRs, I concur with you.
When applying the SDLC, the failure to include nurses in the decision-making process, for instance, is problematic. Inadequate understanding of the software development process problem also creates the necessary dangers (Alqrainy et al.,2014). Environmental, managerial, and technical risk factors can generate uncertain situations that affect SDLC execution. There is also a problem with insufficient resources, which requires scope-appropriate management.
References
Alqrainy, S., Muaidi, H., & Khdour, T (2014). RISK FACTORS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHASES. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thair-\sKhdour/publication/266144501 Risk Factors in Software Development Phases/links/5428066\s10cf2e4ce940c36cc/Risk-Factors-in-Software-Development-Phases.pdf
Sample Answer 5 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
I enjoyed reading your thoughts and list of EHR implementation issues.
However, I wonder if the paucity of nurse participation in the early stages of EHR conversions was due to the uncharted realm of computerized charting. When shifting to computer-only systems, nurses who were accustomed to using paper charts were unaware of what to expect. In my past career, I am aware that I would not have been an ideal resource for offering advice regarding the model workspace and ancillary component integration. In this situation, when there is no precursor technology, nurses may be most helpful during the SDLC’s revision and maintenance phase. During the infancy of the EHR movement, we were able to identify what was functional, efficient, and relevant to our practice, as well as which portions of the program did not function or did not ergonomically fit our workflow.
Now that EHRs are commonplace, I agree that nurses should be included in the design of developing technologies, as we have a comprehensive grasp of the process based on earlier trial and error. The knowledge gathered during the EHR journey has opened the path for nursing informatics and the design and implementation of related projects (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2018).
Reference
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2018). Nursing informatics and the knowledge foundation (4th ed.). The company Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Sample Answer 6 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), according to McGonigle and Mastrian (2018), is a way to deliver an effective, efficient information system. That can fit an organization’s business plan. The cycle is a continuous revolving process that spans the software’s life. For example, planning software production to update, renew, or a new system is developed (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2019). The SDLC process has five stages, namely, Planning, Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Evaluation (Laureate, 2018).
Burns (2012) purports that nurses are not always included in decision-making as it relates to technology implementation. He continued, “if an organization considers what is best for the patient, they will see that nurse plays a decisive role in Information Technology (IT) system implementation, and should be involved at all stages in the process.
The planning stage incorporates the needs of a particular system and technical requirement and should answer the question” what is best for the patient (Laureate Education, 2018). Nurses represent the largest professional group, and they spend the most time interacting with patients through direct patient care. Thus, they would be the majority end users of information systems in an organization and would know what is best to meet the patients’ needs (McGonigle &Mastrian, 2018).
During analysis, the requirement for the system is identified from the organization’s data. The needs and current practices are examined to determine possible changes (McGonigle &Mastrian (2019). According to Burns (2012), organizations should ensure their data is correct, and this can be done by utilizing nurses. Because nurses are responsible for recording a large amount of data. Notably, Burns (2012) states, “nurses believe they need to play a more active role when their organization is implementing new technology.”
Analysis and design are essential in the cycle. The design focuses on what programs are needed and established how they are connected. It involves deciding on a specific function of the hardware, software, and networking possibilities. Analysis and design are crucial in the cycle; nurses can analyze the design to determine shortcomings, thus preventing costly revision dow the road (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2019).
Implementation/ Evaluation in the phase where to software is put to work, in other words, “Go Live.” Burns (2012) states implementation is an important stage where workflows occur. Nurse leaders, Nurse informaticists, and Chief Nursing Officers can ensure a smooth transition of the software for the end-users.
I was not a part of the planning of the IT systems in my organization; however, I believe I have an impact on decision-making. I have a role to play in learning about the system, and it helps me as an individual and impacts the decision made. It is my responsibility to learn the system. I would be able to identify the software’s strengths and weaknesses and seek to become involved in the evaluation process. According to Burns (2012), if more nurses are involved in technology implementation, that could help hospitals embrace new models of care.
In conclusion, nurses are essential to quality healthcare delivery and should be involved in the life of the cycle of System Development. Nurses touch every aspect of care. This means they need to manage change and lead, particularly when it comes to IT (Burns, 2012).
References
Burns, E., (2012). Nurses have an important role to play during technology implementation
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of
knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Laureate Education (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Retrieved
from. https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/202070_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5051_WC/USW1_NURS_5051_module05.html?course_uid=USW1.26538.202070&service_url=https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/wslinks&b2Uri=https%3A%2F%2Fclass.waldenu.edu%2Fwebapps%2Fbbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN
Sample Answer 7 for NURS 6051 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Hello. Thanks for the insightful discussion. From your discussion, I have learned that healthcare professionals including nurses, physicians, etc. ought to be included in the software development life cycle to ensure efficiency. Nurses and other healthcare professionals should be included in the software development life cycle because they have knowledge of the healthcare system that can help inform the development of software applications (McGrow, 2019). They can help ensure that applications are designed with usability in mind, taking into account the needs of nurses and other healthcare professionals who will be using them. They can also help test applications to make sure they work correctly in a healthcare setting. Including nurses and other healthcare professionals in the software development life cycle is a win-win for everyone involved.
The software development life cycle (SDLC) is the process followed by software developers when creating and updating software applications. This process typically includes six distinct phases: 1) requirements gathering, 2) design, 3) implementation or coding, 4) testing, 5) deployment, and 6) maintenance. Requirements gathering is the first phase of the SDLC and involves working with stakeholders to determine what they need and want from the new software application (Ehrler et al., 2019). This step ensures that everyone is on the same page about the project scope and objectives before moving forward. Design is the second phase of the SDLC and entails developing a blueprint for how the new application will look and work.
It is becoming increasingly common for healthcare organizations to adopt software development life cycle (SDLC) models in an effort to improve the efficiency and quality of their care delivery. However, nurses and other healthcare professionals are often left out of the loop when it comes to these initiatives. This can have serious consequences for both patients and staff.
When nurses and other clinicians are not included in the SDLC, they can end up feeling disengaged from their work. This can lead to burnout and turnover, which negatively impacts patient care. Additionally, staff may not have a clear understanding of how new technology is supposed to be used, leading to confusion and errors. Including healthcare professionals in the SDLC helps ensure that everyone is on the same page.
References
Ehrler, F., Lovis, C., & Blondon, K. (2019). A mobile phone app for bedside nursing care: Design and development using an adapted software development life cycle model. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(4), e12551. https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12551.
McGrow, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Essentials for nursing. Nursing, 49(9), 46.
Name: NURS_5051_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
| Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
| First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|