coursework-banner

NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

Walden University NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University    NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

The introduction for the Walden University  NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the   NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for   NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for   NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
The use of a mixed methods design in health care research studies

The novel COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe global impact and thus, mitigating strategies are needed to contain it (Phua, et. al, 2020). Vaccines are the most successful methods available for reducing the worldwide pandemic’s severity (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020). Reluctance to vaccinate among the general population is a major concern for public health professionals. There is little understanding on acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines. There is therefore a need to conduct a study on public’s attitude and acceptance of different COVID-19 vaccines.

The study will apply the use of mixed-method approach. This approach is best suited for this study because combining quantitative and qualitative data will help resolve discrepancies between the two by comparing the responses obtained. This approach also provides the personal view of participants (Creswell, 2017).) their attitude towards vaccine and whether they will accept or not. The use of mixed methods also gives study participants a voice and ensures that study conclusions are anchored in participants’ experiences.

When a study combines qualitative and quantitative data, it improves the findings by making sure that the limitations of one type are balanced by strength of the other (Palinkas, Aarons, & Horwitz, et al., 2017). By combining multiple methods of knowing, comprehension will be improved. Using one method gives incomplete picture and the study will lack strong foundation for discussion. For instance, a huge number of outcomes with too many details or inappropriate conclusions might occur when you focus solely on qualitative findings. On the other hand, it is common to draw extremely broad generalizations without appropriate context when you focus exclusively on quantitative findings. Quantitative data tells you what to do, while qualitative data tells you why to do it; thus improving the findings of the study.

Using mixed method has some drawbacks. It is challenging to conduct a study that uses two different data formats (Johnson, &

NURS 8200 Discussion Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
NURS 8200 Discussion Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

Onwuegbuzie, 2018) because collecting, analyzing data and interpreting findings may take more knowledge than utilizing one approach. Also, there might be discrepancies that occur throughout the comparison process, and they may be difficult to resolve. In addition, they require more resources such as money and time. I will familiarize myself with both research methods so that I can efficiently and effectively collect and analyse the data. I will also employ a research assistant to help with data collection to deal with time constraint.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2018). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Palinkas, L.A., Aarons, G.A., & Horwitz S., et al. (2017). Mixed methods designs in implementation research. Adm. Policy Ment Health; 38(1):44–53.

Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim C-M, & Divatia JV, et al. (2020). Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med.;8(5):506–17. pmid:32272080; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7198848.

Rodrigues C. M. C, & Plotkin, S.A. (2020). Impact of Vaccines; Health, Economic and Social Perspectives. Front Microbiol.;11:1526. pmid:32760367; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7371956.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8200 Discussion: Using Both Quantitative and Qualitative Methods

You have provided an engaging post on the use of a mixed-methods design in health care research studies focusing on the novel COVID-19 pandemic as the selected issue of concern. I agree with you that the COVID-19 pandemic is a complex issue and therefore, a mixed-method design would be appropriate to allow for use of different data collection and analysis approaches to give a better insight into the situation.  A possible quantitative method I would use to collect data about the attitude towards vaccines is to use a questionnaire Likert scale such as I agree, strongly agree, strongly disagree, disagree. This will provide quantitative data which can be complemented by the qualitative data obtained from the semi-structured interviews and thus, the foundation for strong decisions in the future (Laureate Education, 2011). Thanks.

Reference

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2011). Research methods for evidence-based practice: Mixed methods: An example. Baltimore, MD: Author.

What are the factors influencing the use of mixed research method? Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the mixed research method will help the researcher determine the suitability of applying them to the case scenario. In your case, you explored the public’s attitudes on the acceptance of the Covid-19 pandemic vaccines. The study used a mixed-method approach and this would help the researcher obtained adequate data on the research subject. The use of the mixed method would help the researcher to understand both the personal views of the participants and their attitudes towards the vaccines.

One of the methods used in mixed method is that the data from the qualitative approach are compared with the data from the quantitative method (Fetters & Molina-Azorin, 2020). For example, the data collected from the surveys may be compared with the data collected from the interviews. In so doing, the researcher develop a wider perspective of the research question and validate the data collected by comparing and determining the possibility of inconsistency (Mazevska et al., 2021). Such methods help in eliminating biases that could be associated by either of the methods applied in the data collection.

Both the qualitative and quantitative methods have advantages and flaws. Therefore, combining the two helps in providing a more reliable picture of the research question. The combination of the multiple methods of knowing and comprehension will be improved through the method (Ryu, 2020). Furthermore, it is evident that you defined the possible challenges likely to be encountered in using the mixed methods. One major challenge is the possibility of having discrepancies in the results obtained from the two data collection methods.

References

Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2020). Utilizing a mixed methods approach for conducting interventional evaluations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research14(2), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820912856

Mazevska, D., Pearse, J., & Tierney, S. (2021). Using a theoretical framework to inform implementation of the patient-centred medical home (PCMH) model in primary care: Protocol for a mixed methods systematic review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-524707/v1

Ryu, S. (2020). The role of mixed methods in conducting design-based research. Educational Psychologist55(4), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1794871