NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
Walden University NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 8502 Identify Search Strategy
How will you find the necessary evidence for your practice problem? If you are exploring sources outside of “typical” avenues, how do you know where to look?
Understanding where and how to search for evidence is an important first step in exploring sources. A search strategy can benefit your search efforts by providing a necessary framework to begin. As a nurse leader, developing strategy—in this instance a search strategy—can demonstrate your leadership skills as you work to support a practice change that addresses a practice problem.
Photo Credit: enot-poloskun / E+ / Getty Images
For this Assignment, consider the importance of developing a search strategy to find the necessary evidence for your practice problem. How might this development of a search strategy connect to your leadership strategies and styles? Consider the importance of search exploration for finding the necessary evidence for your practice problem.
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources covering source exploration.
Explore search strategies to determine what will work best for your problem.
Consider the connection between source exploration, search strategies, and leadership styles.
The Assignment: (1–2 pages)
Construct a short paper in which you identify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for your practice problem. Why did you select this search strategy, and how will this strategy be most beneficial for the problem? How did your role as leader assist you in making this decision? Be specific and provide examples.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 5 Assignment 4 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 5 Assignment 4 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 5 Assignment 4 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment 4 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment 4
Name: NURS_8502_Week5_Assignment4_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Identify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for the problem.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem, or it is missing.
Explain why you selected the search strategy.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response comprehensively and clearly explains the selection of the search strategy.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection process.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response clearly explains the selection of the search strategy.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection process.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection process.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection process, or it is missing.
Justify why the search strategy is the most beneficial for the identified problem.
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response comprehensively and fully justifies the use of the selected search strategy.
The response comprehensively and clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the use of the search strategy.
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response clearly justifies the use of the selected search strategy.
The response clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the use of the search strategy.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy.
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the use of the search strategy.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy, or it is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support use of the search strategy, or it is missing.
Explain how your role as a leader assisted in your search strategy decision.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8502_Week5_Assignment4_Rubric