NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
Walden University NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 8502 Organizational Readiness Assessment
How do you determine organizational readiness to implement change in your practice or organization? Are the individuals committed to making the change? Are they confident in the impact of the change? Are they prepared to face challenges?
Photo Credit: RoosterHD / E+ / Getty Images
The answers to these questions, and others, may provide insight into the readiness of an organization to implement change. Understanding an organization’s readiness provides critical insight into building a team, identifying stakeholders, and ultimately moving forward with a proposed change. As a nurse leader, it will be important to determine the organizational readiness and motivating factors of individuals associated with the organization to implement change.
For this Assignment, complete the Organizational Readiness Form to assist you in determining the readiness for implementing change. Utilizing this form, you will explore the importance of organizational readiness with your team and other stakeholders.
To Prepare
Determine who is a part of the team needed to address your problem.
Ensure your problem is clearly defined and shared with your team.
The Assignment: (1–2 pages and completed Organizational Readiness Form)
Meet with teams associated with your practice problem to gather information about the problem. With the guidance of the team, answer the following questions:
What is the practice problem?
What are the real or perceived impacts of the problem?
Is the problem defined correctly?
Who are the stakeholders?
Consider the following:
Are the right people at the table?
What is their level of engagement with the problem?
Are there internal/external stakeholders?
After answering the questions, provide an assessment for organizational readiness. Additionally, complete the Organizational Readiness Form provided to you in the Learning Resources. Note: You will be submitting your responses to the prompts for this Assignment and a completed Organizational Readiness Form in the Assignment submission link for this week.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.
Note: You will use this input to create a compelling vision for the change in upcoming weeks.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment 1
Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Identify the problem
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately and clearly identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the problem identified.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the problem identified.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the problem identified.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the problem to be addressed at the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the problem identified, or it is missing.
Identify the real or perceived impacts of the problem.
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately and clearly identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully supports the impacts of the problem identified.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that supports the impacts of the problem identified.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the impacts of the problem identified.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the impacts of the problem to be addressed at the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the impacts of the problem identified, or it is missing.
Describe whether or not the problem is identified correctly.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response comprehensively and fully explains whether the problem is correctly identified.
The response accurately and clearly analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization, providing relevant, specific, and appropriate examples to support the problem identification.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified.
The response analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the problem identification.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified.
The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the problem identification.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether or not the problem is correctly identified, or it is missing.
The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes the problem identification as it relates to the organization, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the problem identification, or it is missing.
Identify the stakeholders.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples of the identified stakeholders.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identified stakeholders.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem.
The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identified stakeholders.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the stakeholders associated with the problem, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identified stakeholders, or it is missing.
Complete the Organizational Readiness Form.
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 17 (17%)
A completed Organizational Readiness Form is submitted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
An incomplete Organizational Readiness Form is submitted, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric