PUBH 8475 Belize Public Health Program Discussion
PUBH 8475 Belize Public Health Program Discussion
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PUBH 8475 Belize Public Health Program Discussion
Imagine that the funder of a public health program has commissioned a comprehensive evaluation of the program. The funder eagerly awaits the results of the evaluation, only to be disappointed when the results do not seem to reflect as dramatic a change as anticipated. Evaluations do not always yield the desired results. In a case such as the one described
above, as a public health professional, how might you go back to a community and tell them that a program did not work? Familiarizing yourself with the challenges of evaluation and reporting will help you mitigate such challenges in the future.
For this week’s Discussion, review the media titled Challenges to Evaluation and Reporting. Consider the evaluation and reporting challenges described by the individuals involved in Mary Open Doors, Water Missions Belize, and the Ministry of Health, and the strategies to address those challenges. Think beyond those that are mentioned by the individuals in the media. Select one of the three public health programs in the media and consider additional challenges to evaluation and reporting.
Post a description of the public health program from Belize that you selected. Describe one potential additional challenge to evaluation and one additional challenge to reporting not mentioned by the individual and explain why they are challenging. Then, explain one strategy for addressing the evaluation challenge and one strategy for addressing the reporting challenge you chose.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PUBH 8475 Belize Public Health Program Discussion
Bottom of Form
Imagine that the funder of a public health program has commissioned a comprehensive evaluation of the program. The funder eagerly awaits the results of the evaluation, only to be disappointed when the results do not seem to reflect as dramatic a change as anticipated. Evaluations do not always yield the desired results. In a case such as the one described above, as a public health professional, how might you go back to a community and tell them that a program did not work? Familiarizing yourself with the challenges of evaluation and reporting will help you mitigate such challenges in the future.
For this week’s Discussion, review the media titled Challenges to Evaluation and Reporting. Consider the evaluation and reporting challenges described by the individuals involved in Mary Open Doors, Water Missions Belize, and the Ministry of Health, and the strategies to address those challenges. Think beyond those that are mentioned by the individuals in the media. Select one of the three public health programs in the media and consider additional challenges to evaluation and reporting.
By Day 3
Post a description of the public health program from Belize that you selected. Describe one potential additional challenge to evaluation and one additional challenge to reporting not mentioned by the individual and explain why they are challenging. Then, explain one strategy for addressing the evaluation challenge and one strategy for addressing the reporting challenge you chose.
Name: Rubric: Nursing Philosophy Exit • • Grid View List View Meets or Exceeds Expectations Mostly Meets Expectations Below Expectations Paradigms of nursing: Health, Nursing, Client, Environment Points Range:9 (18.00%) 10 (20.00%) Paper addresses three elements in all four nursing paradigms. Points Range:7.6 (15.20%) 8.9 (17.80%) Paper addresses two elements in each of the four nursing paradigms, or omits one of the four paradigms. Points Range:6 (12.00%) 7.5 (15.00%) Paper addresses one in each of the four nur paradigms, or omits tw the four paradigms. Effects on Health Points Range:9 (18.00%) 10 (20.00%) Paper considers beliefs on health in explicit detail. Points Range:7.6 (15.20%) 8.9 (17.80%) Paper considers beliefs on health in detail with one omission. Points Range:6 (12.00%) 7.5 (15.00%) Paper considers belie health in some detail w omissions. Aspects of Career Development Points Range:9 (18.00%) 10 (20.00%) Paper includes many aspects of career development in explicit detail and provides examples for each aspect. Points Range:7.6 (15.20%) 8.9 (17.80%) Paper includes several aspects of career development in some detail and provides examples for each aspect with one omission. Points Range:6 (12.00%) 7.5 (15.00%) Paper includes some of career developmen some detail and provid examples for each asp with two omissions. Accountability and Responsibility Points Range:9 (18.00%) 10 (20.00%) Paper identifies many nursing elements of accountability and responsibility for nursing judgments, decisions, and actions. Points Range:7.6 (15.20%) 8.9 (17.80%) Paper identifies several nursing elements of accountability and responsibility for nursing judgments, decisions, and actions. Points Range:6 (12.00%) 7.5 (15.00%) Paper iIdentifies some nursing elements of accountability and responsibility for nursi judgments, decisions, actions. Assignment and delegation of nursing tasks Points Range:9 (18.00%) 10 (20.00%) Paper identifies many elements relating to the assignment and delegation of nursing tasks in extensive detail. Points Range:7.6 (15.20%) 8.9 (17.80%) Paper identifies several elements relating to the assignment and delegation of nursing tasks in detail with one omission. Points Range:6 (12.00%) 7.5 (15.00%) Paper identifies some elements relating to th assignment and deleg nursing tasks in detail two omissions.