Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
Grand Canyon University Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research –Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Healthcare and nursing research is extensive and explores numerous practice issues. As change and evidence-based practice (EBP) agents, nurses should use scientific evidence to make informed decisions. Since such evidence comes from different sources and research subjects vary, understanding the most appropriate is critical. Typically, the best evidence for EBP project ideas should be sourced from high-level evidence and high-grade quality sources.
The nursing shortage is a severe practice problem that hampers nurses’ productivity profoundly. Healthcare research also demonstrates a positive link between a nursing shortage, workplace incivility, and nurse turnover (Al Muharraq et al., 2022). To avert the damaging effects of a nursing shortage, nurses should design and implement creative, sustainable solutions. Interventions vary with the severity of the problem, organizational resources, and preparedness for change. Since a nursing shortage stems from high demand for healthcare services, EBP projects to reduce demand for healthcare services are essential. Regarding the types of scholarly nursing research for guiding project implementation, quantitative and qualitative research can be used individually or jointly. Quantitative research collects and analyzes numerical data to test hypotheses, while qualitative research analyzes non-numerical data to understand concepts (Renjith et al., 2021). Randomized controlled trials are among the widely used quantitative scholarly research since randomization reduces systematic errors in such studies. Mixed methods studies can also be used to investigate nursing shortage and potential solutions further. To enhance reliability and validity, peer-reviewed sources should be highly prioritized.
Many articles investigate the effectiveness of health promotion in reducing the demand for healthcare services. Aubrey-Bassler et al. (2019) assessed the effectiveness of a chronic disease prevention and screening program in primary care. The CRAAP (Currency, Relevancy,
Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) can be used to assess the appropriateness of the research. When using the CRAAP test as the criteria for appropriateness, the focus should be on the publication date (currency), how the research meets the research needs (relevancy), and the authors (New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2022). Other essential considerations include whether the information is accurate and its intended audience.
Healthcare professionals should select research that meets the CRAAP criteria since it is accurate, reliable, and valid. It also seeks to inform by publishing appropriate knowledge to guide practice change. The article by Aubrey-Bassler et al. (2019) meets the five criteria since it is recently published, meets the research needs, and the authors have been cited by others. Peer review promotes accuracy, and the article’s overall purpose is to inform the audience. Based on these criteria, the article can be used to support an EBP project on health promotion to reduce the demand for healthcare services.
References
Al Muharraq, E. H., Baker, O. G., & Alallah, S. M. (2022). The prevalence and the relationship of workplace bullying and nurses turnover intentions: A cross sectional study. SAGE Open Nursing, 8, 23779608221074655. doi: 10.1177/23779608221074655
Aubrey-Bassler, K., Fernandes, C., Penney, C., Cullen, R., Meaney, C., Sopcak, N., … & Manca, D. (2019). The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: An implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program. BJGP Open, 3(3): bjgpopen19X101656. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative methods in health care research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19
New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022). How to evaluate information sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP
ALSO READ:
Discuss how the shift to value-based health care has impacted delivery of care and the role and responsibilities of the advanced registered nurse.
Differentiate between “leading” and “managing.”
Discuss the importance of interoperability between EHRs and other disparate systems and the impact on improving quality and access to care
Emerging Technology Brief
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Topic 6 DQ 1: Appropriateness of Research
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource