NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
Chamberlain University NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded) assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded) depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded) is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded) assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded) assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
Reflect upon the nursing practice issue of interest that you identified in earlier discussion assignments. In addition, consider the intervention that you proposed to improve the issue.
With both the issue and the proposed practice change in mind, respond to the following:
What type of evidence produced through qualitative research would be helpful to better understand the selected practice issue?
How might qualitative research findings shape your efforts to improve the issue?
Describe an example (real or hypothetical) of a qualitative research design that would provide valuable evidence regarding this issue.
Sample Answer for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
Healthcare system is highly dynamic in terms of the population characteristics of the patients and the healthcare providers. Therefore, cross-cultural competencies are required to facilitate easy interactions between the healthcare providers and the patients. Also, there must be a smooth and effective communication practices among the healthcare providers. The interactions between the nurses and other healthcare providers creates an environment of transparency that builds the culture of quality and safety. On the other hand, lack of collaboration result in defragmented care delivery system where the patients struggle to receive treatments. As outlined in the previous study, conflict and lack of collaboration between the nurses and other professionals in health sector undermined the quality of the healthcare delivered to the patients.
The quantitative research analyzed provided sufficient evidence that lack of collaboration in healthcare negative affect the quality of healthcare services delivered to the patients. The study by Rosen et al. (2018), mentioned the need for constant communication and this means that there should be both policies and resources to facilitate the communication. Efficient communication means that healthcare providers can discuss pertinent issues about the patients’ health and treatment modalities and thus provide the most effective plan that will result in the most beneficial outcome. The quantitative research also provided evidence that failed communication influenced poor patient outcomes directly. Alternatively, the health issue can be addressed by introducing telemedicine which links different departments in healthcare delivery environment efficiently (‘‘Revolutionizing healthcare with IoT and cognitive, cloud-based telemedicine,’’ 2019). The technology creates a cheap and reliable interaction environment since the healthcare providers do not necessarily require to move out of their working stations to interact with other departments.
ALSO READ:
NR 505 What factors might influence the particular data collection method that is used within a research study?
NR 505 Reflect upon the impact of evidence-based practice on health outcomes, the nursing profession, and healthcare delivery
The findings indicated in the quantitative research provides useful insight into measures that can be used to address the clinical practice issue. The proposals can be implemented in healthcare setting to improve the issue and ensure better patients experiences. Healthcare providers have to interact constantly and engage in collaborative quality improvement measures that will help in addressing the key issues and foster an environment of safety. The telemedicine technology is highly integrated and can be implemented by healthcare institutions to promote collaboration and constant communication (Revolutionizing healthcare with IoT and cognitive, cloud-based telemedicine, 2019). The interconnection means that the clinicians and nurses can easily obtain relevant information for a particular patients needed for patients management. Additionally, it becomes easy to propose and implement changes aimed at improving the interactions and practices within the organization.
An example of the quantitative research design that would provide valuable evidence related to the issue would involve a cross-sectional design where the surveys will be administered to healthcare providers across the various healthcare institution. The study will target both institutions with telemedicine and those without the technology. In addition, structured interviews will be conducted with the various nurses and clinicians to determine their experiences with the telemedicine as far as communication and collaboration is concerned. The t-test will be used to determine whether there is a significant difference in the level of collaboration and ease communication between the two hospitals settings. The findings from the study will be used to prove that telemedicine enhances collaboration and communication among healthcare providers.
Finally, the units in healthcare delivery system are interconnected and this indicates why constant communication and collaboration is needed. On the other hand, poor collaboration results in delayed care delivered and increased frustration among the patients. Therefore, healthcare institutions should implement the telemedicine to foster collaboration and constant communication among healthcare providers.
Also Read: NR 505 What factors might influence the particular data collection method that is used within a research study?
References
Revolutionizing healthcare with IoT and cognitive, cloud-based telemedicine. (2019). Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.16.2.2019.2.10
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018). Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. American Psychologist, 73(4), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298
Sample Answer 2 for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
Developing a precise research topic facilitates the search for the most accessible evidence-based data for decision making. Evidence-based practice (EBP) has reverberated throughout nursing practice, education, and science. The demand for evidence-based quality improvement and healthcare transformation highlights the necessity of redesigning care to be effective, safe, and efficient. Nursing science must include all types of research, from discovery to translation, from the laboratory to the bedside, and from mechanistic to holistic (Pickler, 2018). It is now widely acknowledged that evidence-based practice is the key to improving healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Evidence from research (effective innovation) must be combined with good execution and a good environment to produce significant results.
The application of the PICOT framework to the formulation of research questions improves the outcomes of studies on the topics or concerns being addressed. A PICOT inquiry consists of five elements: the population, the intervention, the comparison, the outcome, and the time frame. The population discussed the nature of the problem and those affected by it. The intervention represents the solution to the problem. The comparison represents a different solution. The time frame is the intervention’s duration. Wright (2018)
In the first week, I focused on the significance of patient-centered treatment for adolescents and young adults. The PICOT question for my area of interest would be: how does the person-centered care provided by family nurse practitioners to adolescents and young adults over the course of six to twelve months assist them in achieving their intended goals and achieving positive outcomes as compared to those who receive care centered solely on their health problems? With this question, I determined the population to be adolescents and young adults, the intervention to be considering the patient as a “whole” person by involving patients and their families in shared decision-making to attain predetermined goals in the management of their healthcare, the comparison to be with those who received care that was health issue-focused rather than holistic, and the outcome to be the number of quality patient outcomes provided by FNP as determined by the empirical data over six to twelve months.
I chose teenagers and young adults as my population because they are more susceptible to depression and more reticent; it is difficult to encourage adolescents to explore their emotions and offer their perspectives. While receiving person-centered care from FNP and other care providers, patients can develop trust with their providers when they realize that their provider is interested in listening to their feelings, their culture, and their ideals, as well as recognizing their views and ideas in decision-making regarding care planning, as patient preferences are one of the pillars of evidence-based practice. Building on research that looks at the implementation of a patient-centered approach through evidence-based quality improvement (Stockdale et al., 2018), patients are known as people in the context of their own social worlds. They are listened to, informed, respected, and involved in their care, and their wishes are respected (but not blindly carried out) throughout their health care journey.
References
Pickler, R. H. (2018). Honoring the past, pursuing the future. Nursing Research, 67(1), 1–2. 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000255
Stockdale, S.E., Zuchowski, J., Rubenstein, L.V., Sapir, N., Yano, E.M., Altman, L., & et al. (2018). Fostering evidence-based quality improvement for patient-centered medical homes: initiating local quality councils to transform primary care. Health Care Manage;43(2):168–80.
Wright, K. (2018). Building and Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches. Mount Carmel Health Sciences Library. https://library.mchs.com/docs/workshops/EBP_Literature_Search/EBP_Workshop_Building_and_Strenghtening_pd
Sample Answer 3 for NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
End-of-life care discussion is a difficult discussion to have for patients, their family, and providers. If there is a discussion on end-of-life it can result in anxiety and depression. Hence, this research is important and useful to the nurse practitioners (NPs) clinical practice., especially NPs working with older adults. As stated in the article, end-of-life discussion is an important discussion to have with patients that terminal diseases and are near death. It is also important for practitioners to receive training on advance care planning in order to best communicate with the patient and family. The researchers indicated that the study benefited all parties, including the practitioners, because there is an improvement in end-of-life communication scores in the ACP intervention group (Houben et al., 2019). Owing to the significant improvement in anxiety and depression, this article will support the evidence-based practice change of reducing anxiety and depression in patients and families when it comes to discussing advanced care planning.
Reference
Houben, C., Spruit, M., Luyten, H., Pennings, H., Boofaart, V., Creemers, J., … Janssen, D. (2019) Cluster-randomised trial of a nurse-led advanced care planning session in patients with COPD and their loved ones. Thorax 74(4), 328-336. https://thorax.bmj.com/content/74/4/328